Home | Webstore
Latest News: OOTP 25 Available - FHM 10 Available - OOTP Go! Available

Out of the Park Baseball 25 Buy Now!

  

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Out of the Park Baseball 21 > Perfect Team 21
Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Perfect Team 21 Perfect Team 21 - The online revolution! Battle tens of thousands of PT managers from all over the world and become a legend.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-22-2020, 03:05 AM   #21
Markus Heinsohn
Developer OOTP
 
Markus Heinsohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 24,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westheim View Post
Okay, I'll be the one. I don't like the prospect of half the teams in a league getting booted up or down on Monday. Leaves little to no room for experimentation / position training without careening towards the red zone.
This screenshot is from the beta and the number will be adjusted throughout the life cycle, but yes, this is essentially what we strive for. A common complaint in PT20 was that there not enough promotions / relegations, and this will fix it
Markus Heinsohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2020, 03:38 AM   #22
rudel.dietrich
Hall Of Famer
 
rudel.dietrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Posts: 8,608
Infractions: 1/0 (0)
I cannot wait to start racking up those stone championships


Also, I saw something about new card art, will perfect cards have more visual flair now?
As it stands now they look similar to iron cards but more shiny.
They need to pop
rudel.dietrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2020, 04:10 AM   #23
Lemandria
All Star Reserve
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 702
Speaking of Stone, shouldn't levels before Iron take a bit of rearrangement?

Stone Age, Bronze Age, Iron Age...

The order as listed (while closer to ootp tradition) is otherwise not intuitive. Bronze has always (to me) seemed out of order in the sequence, and the addition of Stone just makes it more obvious.
__________________
FOTF victim
Farewell

Last edited by Lemandria; 02-22-2020 at 04:24 AM.
Lemandria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2020, 06:20 AM   #24
Westheim
Hall Of Famer
 
Westheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 11,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemandria View Post
Speaking of Stone, shouldn't levels before Iron take a bit of rearrangement?

Stone Age, Bronze Age, Iron Age...

The order as listed (while closer to ootp tradition) is otherwise not intuitive. Bronze has always (to me) seemed out of order in the sequence, and the addition of Stone just makes it more obvious.
It makes total sense if you think of Olympic medals. Gold - Silver - Bronze. And after that it's scrap metal or whatever you want to get for fourth place.
__________________
Portland Raccoons, 83 years of excell-.... of baseball: Furballs here!
1983 * 1989 * 1991 * 1992 * 1993 * 1995 * 1996 * 2010 * 2017 * 2018 * 2019 * 2026 * 2028 * 2035 * 2037 * 2044 * 2045 * 2046 * 2047 * 2048 * 2051 * 2054 * 2055
1 OSANAI : 2 POWELL : 7 NOMURA | RAMOS : 8 REECE : 10 BROWN : 15 HALL : 27 FERNANDEZ : 28 CASAS : 31 CARMONA : 32 WEST : 39 TONER : 46 SAITO

Resident Mets Cynic - The Mets from 1962 onwards, here.
Westheim is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2020, 06:53 AM   #25
Lemandria
All Star Reserve
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westheim View Post
It makes total sense if you think of Olympic medals. Gold - Silver - Bronze. And after that it's scrap metal or whatever you want to get for fourth place.
Yeah, I'd considered that.

It's one of those trivial issues that you can really only tweak well before Beta.

I'm sure the card art is already done or mostly done. Which would mean changes now are a fast "NO," anyway.
__________________
FOTF victim
Farewell

Last edited by Lemandria; 02-22-2020 at 06:55 AM.
Lemandria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2020, 07:04 AM   #26
Westheim
Hall Of Famer
 
Westheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 11,886
Hesiod's Ages of Man also mostly concur with OOTP. ... and well, Heroic cards would look weird.
__________________
Portland Raccoons, 83 years of excell-.... of baseball: Furballs here!
1983 * 1989 * 1991 * 1992 * 1993 * 1995 * 1996 * 2010 * 2017 * 2018 * 2019 * 2026 * 2028 * 2035 * 2037 * 2044 * 2045 * 2046 * 2047 * 2048 * 2051 * 2054 * 2055
1 OSANAI : 2 POWELL : 7 NOMURA | RAMOS : 8 REECE : 10 BROWN : 15 HALL : 27 FERNANDEZ : 28 CASAS : 31 CARMONA : 32 WEST : 39 TONER : 46 SAITO

Resident Mets Cynic - The Mets from 1962 onwards, here.
Westheim is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2020, 09:16 AM   #27
HRBaker
Hall Of Famer
 
HRBaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by xekyn92 View Post
It’s super nitpicky but I really dislike the name of ‘Stone’ tier, it feels thematically out of place. Personally would have much preferred ‘Rookie < Iron < Bronze < Silver < Gold < Platinum < Diamond < Perfect’ since Platinum is a common tier that appears in lots of other games with a competitive ranking system. Not the end of the world, just strikes me as bizarre.

I'm not sure why, but I always have seen the "bronze" cards mentally as "copper". In my head I'm always thinking Copper. I guess the actual color tone looks more copper to me. lol


As far as "stone", it does look a little out-of-place, but the reality is there are only so many metals and renaming a level now would probably lead to a lot of confusion.
__________________


HRBaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2020, 09:38 AM   #28
PocketsAintFull
All Star Starter
 
PocketsAintFull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 1,771
To me, having Rookie & Stone makes Iron sound more impressive
__________________
PocketsAintFull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2020, 10:04 AM   #29
FancySkunk
All Star Reserve
 
FancySkunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markus Heinsohn View Post
We don't have Platinum cards, and we want a consistent scale. So not bizarre at all
Still, I wonder if there's a better name than Stone, just to remove the conflict with Silver for a single letter abbreviation. Maybe Aluminum :P
FancySkunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2020, 10:30 AM   #30
xekyn92
Bat Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markus Heinsohn View Post
We don't have Platinum cards, and we want a consistent scale. So not bizarre at all
I see your point, but you don’t have a ‘stone’ or ‘rookie’ tier of cards either (well not in the previous versions anyway).

Personally i’m not sure why the league tiers necessarily have to parallel the card tiers either. Nevertheless something just feels unfitting about ‘stone’ tier to me, seems a little out of place but it’s a trivial matter.

Last edited by xekyn92; 02-22-2020 at 10:31 AM.
xekyn92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2020, 12:19 PM   #31
daves
Hall Of Famer
 
daves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,634
So will this limit or almost eliminate championships on a player card or will diamond championships also be recognized?
Attached Images
Image 
__________________




daves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2020, 01:14 PM   #32
daves
Hall Of Famer
 
daves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,634
I hope the promotion and relegation will be the same from the start?
__________________




daves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2020, 02:53 PM   #33
rudel.dietrich
Hall Of Famer
 
rudel.dietrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Posts: 8,608
Infractions: 1/0 (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FancySkunk View Post
Still, I wonder if there's a better name than Stone, just to remove the conflict with Silver for a single letter abbreviation. Maybe Aluminum :P
Balsa Wood tier
rudel.dietrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2020, 03:38 PM   #34
Westheim
Hall Of Famer
 
Westheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 11,886
Lint!
__________________
Portland Raccoons, 83 years of excell-.... of baseball: Furballs here!
1983 * 1989 * 1991 * 1992 * 1993 * 1995 * 1996 * 2010 * 2017 * 2018 * 2019 * 2026 * 2028 * 2035 * 2037 * 2044 * 2045 * 2046 * 2047 * 2048 * 2051 * 2054 * 2055
1 OSANAI : 2 POWELL : 7 NOMURA | RAMOS : 8 REECE : 10 BROWN : 15 HALL : 27 FERNANDEZ : 28 CASAS : 31 CARMONA : 32 WEST : 39 TONER : 46 SAITO

Resident Mets Cynic - The Mets from 1962 onwards, here.
Westheim is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2020, 03:40 PM   #35
Fabtron7
All Star Reserve
 
Fabtron7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 870
Just want to say I'm loving this.

Fabtron7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2020, 05:28 PM   #36
bailey
Hall Of Famer
 
bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by daves View Post
I hope the promotion and relegation will be the same from the start?
You mean no rush to perfect, by promoting 16 teams a week?
__________________

bailey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2020, 05:32 PM   #37
daves
Hall Of Famer
 
daves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by bailey View Post
You mean no rush to perfect, by promoting 16 teams a week?
Correct!
__________________




daves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2020, 01:34 PM   #38
One Great Matrix
All Star Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,782
You know what I liked? When I was in the entry pool & the league had a unique name.

Perhaps that's a thing reserved to entry pools now or a thing of a past but just something I liked.
__________________


One Great Matrix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2020, 01:42 PM   #39
One Great Matrix
All Star Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by rudel.dietrich View Post
I cannot wait to start racking up those stone championships


Also, I saw something about new card art, will perfect cards have more visual flair now?
As it stands now they look similar to iron cards but more shiny.
They need to pop
I feel like that can be accomplished with the OVR number alone. Stone a rock grey, Iron a metallic grey (dull), Bronze, Silver (shiny grey), Gold, Diamond (current or crystal clear polygonic), Perfect (red,white,blue to go with 21 theme or you know, something), point being the cards could, COULD be identical otherwise.
__________________


One Great Matrix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2020, 06:16 PM   #40
rburgh
All Star Reserve
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 733
One problem that I see. Suppose you have 5400 Rookie teams at 30 per league, or 180 Rookie leagues and 4800 Stone teams, in 160 leagues. At the end of the week you promote 8x180, or 1440 teams. But you relegate only 8x160, or 1280 teams.

If you want to build a pyramidal structure, you have to, say, promote 6 teams from each league and relegate 8. That way, if you have 180 leagues at the lowest level, you will have 1080 promotions and if you divide that by 8 you will maintain equilibrium when you have 135 teams at the next level.

Carrying this forward, you would have:
Rookie 180
Stone 135
Iron 101
Bronze 76
Silver 57
Gold 43
Diamond 32
Perfect 1

That would be a total of 625 leagues, and 18,750 teams.

Essentially, if you promote x number of teams from each league at level n to level n+1 and relegate y teams from each league at level n+1 to n, the number of leagues at level n will reach equilibrium at a ratio of y/x * number of leagues at level n+1.

Last edited by rburgh; 02-28-2020 at 06:17 PM. Reason: correct math error and spelling
rburgh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 PM.

 

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com.

Officially Licensed Product – MLB Players, Inc.

Out of the Park Baseball is a registered trademark of Out of the Park Developments GmbH & Co. KG

Google Play is a trademark of Google Inc.

Apple, iPhone, iPod touch and iPad are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.

COPYRIGHT © 2023 OUT OF THE PARK DEVELOPMENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2020 Out of the Park Developments