New transaction screen / stars ratings

Markus Heinsohn · 06-01-2006, 11:08 AM

Check this out:
http://ootpdevfiles.com/ootp/screens/trans.jpg

Each little player box now allows you to display ratings, along with the overall rating and overall potential rating of the scout you have currently selected (upper right corner).

This is supported in the team transaction screen and the trade screen. With the overall ratings visible there, you won't need any stars

I will make the overall ratings soon visible in the big player lists as well, but this takes some more coding time because that list is sortable and filters can be applied. So this is something for a second patch or a later update.

thomamon · 06-01-2006, 11:09 AM

Now that I like much more then stars!

Hammer755 · 06-01-2006, 11:10 AM

Eumel · 06-01-2006, 11:12 AM

Excellent indeed!

Circle Of Friends · 06-01-2006, 11:12 AM

The potential rating in the shot you posted--is that going to be in the first patch?

genghisdunn · 06-01-2006, 11:13 AM

Sure, that'll do. Just something that permits a quick evaluation of the players in an organization. It didn't necessarily have to be little blue/gold stars.

Thanks.

Klew1986 · 06-01-2006, 11:13 AM

I have a question. Looking at the picture. The 3B at the very top left has like an overall rating of like 40 something and then the guy right below him has like 20. Is it because he is more developed? If I use all 1-20 scales for everything, will it only be 1-20 on overall ratings?

Joshv02 · 06-01-2006, 11:15 AM

Fantastic.

Markus Heinsohn · 06-01-2006, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Circle Of Friends

The potential rating in the shot you posted--is that going to be in the first patch?

Yes.

Hellion9 · 06-01-2006, 11:15 AM

This is a nice look for a quick "overall" rating. I like it.

Markus Heinsohn · 06-01-2006, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Klew1986

I have a question. Looking at the picture. The 3B at the very top left has like an overall rating of like 40 something and then the guy right below him has like 20. Is it because he is more developed? If I use all 1-20 scales for everything, will it only be 1-20 on overall ratings?

It'S a 20-80 scale here, like the real life scouts use.

Marlinfan · 06-01-2006, 11:16 AM

great stuff

andymac · 06-01-2006, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Klew1986

If I use all 1-20 scales for everything, will it only be 1-20 on overall ratings?

This is the only the more I would like to see...then player evaluation will be about as close to perfect in this game as I could ever expect.

genghisdunn · 06-01-2006, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Klew1986

I have a question. Looking at the picture. The 3B at the very top left has like an overall rating of like 40 something and then the guy right below him has like 20. Is it because he is more developed? If I use all 1-20 scales for everything, will it only be 1-20 on overall ratings?

The overall/potential are on a 20-80 scale. Overall would correspond to ratings, while potential would correspond to talent (in 6.5).

So a guy with 47 overall is more developed than a guy with 20 overall. But to see how good they *could* be, you'd want to look at the potential column (and the guy with 58 potential is of course on track to be better than the guy with 27 potential).

Jason · 06-01-2006, 11:16 AM

Brilliant job, Markus. Well done.

andymac · 06-01-2006, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Markus Heinsohn

It'S a 20-80 scale here, like the real life scouts use.

No chance of that scale becoming editable like the rest of the ratings?

White Sox · 06-01-2006, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Klew1986

I have a question. Looking at the picture. The 3B at the very top left has like an overall rating of like 40 something and then the guy right below him has like 20. Is it because he is more developed? If I use all 1-20 scales for everything, will it only be 1-20 on overall ratings?

I think what this guy is asking is will there be a way to distinguish between veterans who have reached their potential (gold stars) and prospects who still have further potential (blue stars)?

Thanks

treedom · 06-01-2006, 11:19 AM

Wow, that's pretty cool!

thomamon · 06-01-2006, 11:20 AM

Potential = Blue Stars, Ratings = Gold Stars

Hammer755 · 06-01-2006, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waninski

I think what this guy is asking is will there be a way to distinguish between veterans who have reached their potential (gold stars) and prospects who still have further potential (blue stars)?

Thanks

The player's age, combined with his overall/potential ratings should tell you as much as the stars did, and probably more. A player who was 24 with extremely low ratings & extremely high potential was considered a 5* blue prospect in OOTP6, but was just filler realistically. The second he turned 25 (or 26, maybe) he became a 1* gold player.

06-01-2006, 11:08 AM	#1
Markus Heinsohn Developer OOTP Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Germany Posts: 24,739	New transaction screen / stars ratings Check this out: http://ootpdevfiles.com/ootp/screens/trans.jpg Each little player box now allows you to display ratings, along with the overall rating and overall potential rating of the scout you have currently selected (upper right corner). This is supported in the team transaction screen and the trade screen. With the overall ratings visible there, you won't need any stars I will make the overall ratings soon visible in the big player lists as well, but this takes some more coding time because that list is sortable and filters can be applied. So this is something for a second patch or a later update.

06-01-2006, 11:09 AM	#2
thomamon Global Moderator Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: NJ Posts: 5,274	Now that I like much more then stars! __________________ Thomas A. Montalto Please check out my Stupid Little Blog - http://www.stupidlittleblog.com

06-01-2006, 11:13 AM	#6
genghisdunn Minors (Double A) Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 119	Sure, that'll do. Just something that permits a quick evaluation of the players in an organization. It didn't necessarily have to be little blue/gold stars. Thanks. __________________ Proud owner of the 5-time RLPA World Champion Houston Astros.

06-01-2006, 11:15 AM	#8
Joshv02 Hall Of Famer Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: , " Posts: 3,082 Blog Entries: 2	Fantastic. __________________ Brookline Maccabees. RIP

06-01-2006, 11:15 AM	#10
Hellion9 Minors (Triple A) Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 222 Infractions: 0/1 (1)	This is a nice look for a quick "overall" rating. I like it. __________________ They still believe that they can hold the reins, but then they've got no sense of history.

06-01-2006, 11:10 AM	#3
Hammer755 Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Houston, TX Posts: 2,348

06-01-2006, 11:12 AM	#4
Eumel Major Leagues Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Germany Posts: 499	Excellent indeed!

06-01-2006, 11:12 AM	#5
Circle Of Friends Banned Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 39	The potential rating in the shot you posted--is that going to be in the first patch?

06-01-2006, 11:13 AM	#7
Klew1986 Hall Of Famer Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Minnesota Posts: 2,722	I have a question. Looking at the picture. The 3B at the very top left has like an overall rating of like 40 something and then the guy right below him has like 20. Is it because he is more developed? If I use all 1-20 scales for everything, will it only be 1-20 on overall ratings?

06-01-2006, 11:16 AM	#12
Marlinfan Minors (Double A) Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Stoke-on-Trent Posts: 110	great stuff

06-01-2006, 11:16 AM	#15
Jason Hall Of Famer Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 3,827 Blog Entries: 3	Brilliant job, Markus. Well done.

06-01-2006, 11:19 AM	#18
treedom Hall Of Famer Join Date: May 2002 Location: Transylvania Posts: 2,900	Wow, that's pretty cool! __________________ A rake and a roustabout.

06-01-2006, 11:20 AM	#19
thomamon Global Moderator Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: NJ Posts: 5,274	Potential = Blue Stars, Ratings = Gold Stars __________________ Thomas A. Montalto Please check out my Stupid Little Blog - http://www.stupidlittleblog.com