|
||||
|
07-31-2013, 09:30 AM | #21 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All alone
Posts: 12,612
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
Quote:
Excuse me, knowing a player's precise potential ratings is somehow more realistic? No way. To SO players, SO is far more realistic than vanilla OOTP. You have to look at the scouting report - not precise potential values that no GM could ever know - and look at the player's stats and make decisions. There is no magic numbers to help you. To SO players, SO is both harder and more realistic. Which is why some of us like it so much.
__________________
__________________ Quote:
Five thousand thanks for a non-modder? I never thought I'd see the day. Thank you for your support. Last edited by The Wolf; 08-02-2013 at 03:06 PM. Reason: Edited to be totally civil |
||
07-31-2013, 09:45 AM | #22 | |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 678
|
Quote:
|
|
07-31-2013, 09:48 AM | #23 | |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,119
|
Quote:
__________________
"Sometimes, this is like going to a grocery store. You’ve got a list until you get to the check-out stand. And then you start reading People magazine, and all this other [stuff] ends up in the basket." -Sandy Alderson on the MLB offseason Last edited by Cinnamon J. Scudworth; 07-31-2013 at 09:50 AM. |
|
07-31-2013, 10:23 AM | #24 |
OOTP Developer
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 14,117
|
I would probably go back to ratings if they worked like how we think of things in real life, but I think they're still too accurate. And also oddly not accurate enough. It's hard to describe, but they just feel too all-encompassing, and when you see the ratings, it makes it way too easy to ignore the stats.
Going with a combination of the written scouting report and the stats I find is a great mix that gives me just enough info to judge players, but not too much that I feel like I know exactly how they will do. |
07-31-2013, 10:26 AM | #25 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All alone
Posts: 12,612
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
This. Exactly.
__________________
__________________ Quote:
Five thousand thanks for a non-modder? I never thought I'd see the day. Thank you for your support. |
|
07-31-2013, 10:54 AM | #26 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 9,798
|
|
07-31-2013, 10:57 AM | #27 | |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,119
|
Quote:
The scouting reports kill immersion for me in the same way that it seems like the ratings do for you.
__________________
"Sometimes, this is like going to a grocery store. You’ve got a list until you get to the check-out stand. And then you start reading People magazine, and all this other [stuff] ends up in the basket." -Sandy Alderson on the MLB offseason Last edited by Cinnamon J. Scudworth; 07-31-2013 at 11:07 AM. |
|
07-31-2013, 11:21 AM | #28 |
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 62
|
Interesting topic. I tried SO once and didn't find it my cup of tea.
As a dodger fan, I can think of a real-life example of how scouting ratings work pretty realistic in the OOTP world. Darren Dreifort is a classic example of a player who scouts would have rated 80 out of 80 or close to. (I don't play historical but would be interested to know what kind of ratings Dreifort gets in the game). Tony Gwynn once said he had the best stuff in the Major Leagues. Injuries played a large part, but the fact is Dreifort never could put it all together on the ML level. He had his moments, but he failed as a starter and then wasn't much better as a reliever. Had expectations been lower, I'm sure many major leaguers would have been happy with his career, but because he was "rated so highly" he's looked at as a letdown. So, when that guy with ratings through the roof never quite puts it together (Dreifort was drafted early in the 1st round btw) just think of Dreifort and others like him and realize gaudy scouting ratings aren't the be-all-end-all to player evaluation. Every scout in the world can say the same thing about a guy and still be wrong. I think OOTP's scouting system does a good job of mimicking this in the game, and I find it more interesting and immersive when there are certain guys who just never quite live up to those ratings..
__________________
Someday I want to defend a penguin in court, just so I can say, "Your honor, clearly my defendant isn't a flight risk." Last edited by mattb_222; 07-31-2013 at 11:42 AM. |
07-31-2013, 11:51 AM | #29 | |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 471
|
Quote:
|
|
07-31-2013, 11:56 AM | #30 |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 471
|
When we in the forums refer to Stats-Only, we mean the non-use of ratings.
I'll throw my two cents in...S/O is the best way to play. I feel like I'm playing Madden when using ratings, you just go by what a player is rated. Plus, it's a total buzzkill if a player drops off in rating. For example, Jason Bay (my favorite reference). IRL he started the season in the starting lineup...then we saw his stats were awful. Why would you want to see the ratings drop before the season started? So you could trade him or make other arrangements, right? This isn't how it works in real life. Thus, S/O is the way to go. I hope my mini-rant made sense by the way... |
07-31-2013, 11:58 AM | #31 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,627
|
To The Wolf: How I learned to stop worrying and love stats only
Quote:
I use like a hybrid of "stats only" My AI Eval settings are favored to stats but I have some weight to ratings and use them but my scout accuracy is set to very low. Even if scouts are set to 100% accurate, I don't feel like it gives things away or lose realism because a player can have a bad year even with great ratings. Also depending where you have your injury setting at this could also effect stat output. Oh and not to mention fatigue if its set higher. Its all player preference though. I personally would NEVER play with pure ratings or any setting that favors ratings lol. Last edited by SirMichaelJordan; 07-31-2013 at 12:03 PM. |
|
07-31-2013, 12:00 PM | #32 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Rockford
Posts: 2,535
|
Quote:
Pitch speed does decrease in OOTP and usually does correspond to decrease in the stuff rating. But, I certainly get where you're coming from. For the most part it is difficult to see when those hits happen. I'm guessing that's part of the fun for a lot of those who enjoy that mode.
__________________
New Album coming soon! |
|
07-31-2013, 12:01 PM | #33 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All alone
Posts: 12,612
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
Yes, I am. Stats only means no ratings, not no scouting reports.
__________________
__________________ Quote:
Five thousand thanks for a non-modder? I never thought I'd see the day. Thank you for your support. |
|
07-31-2013, 12:02 PM | #34 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All alone
Posts: 12,612
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
Quote:
__________________
__________________ Quote:
Five thousand thanks for a non-modder? I never thought I'd see the day. Thank you for your support. |
||
07-31-2013, 12:04 PM | #35 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All alone
Posts: 12,612
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
Stats only isn't for everyone. Vanilla isn't for everyone. Play the game however you enjoy it most. But let's not fight about it.
__________________
__________________ Quote:
Five thousand thanks for a non-modder? I never thought I'd see the day. Thank you for your support. |
|
07-31-2013, 12:06 PM | #36 | |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,119
|
Quote:
__________________
"Sometimes, this is like going to a grocery store. You’ve got a list until you get to the check-out stand. And then you start reading People magazine, and all this other [stuff] ends up in the basket." -Sandy Alderson on the MLB offseason |
|
07-31-2013, 12:28 PM | #37 |
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 99
|
Stats Only saved the game for me. The ratings made the game way too easy and I had zero immersion. Whoever said it felt like Madden is dead-on. Personally, I use the reports still but I turn Scouting Accuracy to "low" so I'm made to trust them even less.
That's just me, though. I'm more likely to abandon a game I'm dominating than one which is dominating me. And when I do well with stats only--it is far more gratifying. I feel like a genuine baseball genius. |
07-31-2013, 12:35 PM | #38 | |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 951
|
Quote:
Just drop it and let's talk about stuff that actually matters rather than arguing. |
|
07-31-2013, 12:37 PM | #39 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 9,798
|
Quote:
Verbal scouting reports say things like "elite offensive player, you can expect .300/.400/.600 in a given season". That's pretty easy to translate to ratings. To me, stats only means only using stats. |
|
07-31-2013, 01:02 PM | #40 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 10,036
|
I currently have 2-8 ratings turned on for fielding, peripherals, and... potential ratings. I like having the potential ratings in there as a crutch. My excuse is that I tend to play "god mode", which essentially means GMing all 16 teams in a league, and I generally don't want to drill down to each and every single player in every minor league system to see who I am missing. I do give names to all picks in the top 2 rounds of the draft, which helps that, and in practice I do generally end up looking at everybody's player card who is in the majors at some time or another.
I do find that I prefer looking at scouting ratings rather than the 2-8 potential numbers. I have those set to either "Low" or "Very Low" in terms of accuracy so it's entirely possible that the scout I'm looking at these through simply thinks a guy is not as good as he really is. To make matters worse, I'm operating in the dead ball era, where the AI really does not do a great job of rating players on a gestalt level, especially WRT fielding (I've seen players rated 6 on the 2-8 scale have woefully terrible error rates and 4-rated shortstops with positive ZRs). I might eliminate potential ratings here as well so that I have to look at scouting reports. I do think that I probably judge guys with 3/8 contact potentials as not prospecty enough to give a shot to, and not even being able to look at this on the main page might help me to stop. The one thing I think SO misses out on are pitches. We need *something* there for them, some sort of Fangraphs-style stat like frequency of use. Ideally something like strike and swing percentages would be cool as well.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|