|
||||
|
|
Suggestions for Future OOTP Versions Post suggestions for the next version of Out of the Park Baseball here! |
|
Thread Tools |
01-03-2014, 01:42 PM | #21 |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 1,736
|
|
01-03-2014, 01:46 PM | #22 | |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 1,736
|
Quote:
|
|
01-03-2014, 01:49 PM | #23 | |
OOTP Developments
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Nice, Côte d'Azur, France
Posts: 19,757
|
Quote:
Perhaps the logic does need to be changed, idk, but this years crop of rl fa's certainly doesn't suggest that that's the case. |
|
01-03-2014, 01:50 PM | #24 |
OOTP Developments
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Nice, Côte d'Azur, France
Posts: 19,757
|
|
01-03-2014, 01:53 PM | #25 |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 1,736
|
well, they didn't because GM are afraid of the consequences. how would AI have handled had i offered a QO to Josh Johnson (which i would have btw). this needs to be programmed. how would AI evaluate this?
|
01-03-2014, 01:54 PM | #26 |
OOTP Developments
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Nice, Côte d'Azur, France
Posts: 19,757
|
|
01-03-2014, 02:23 PM | #27 | |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 345
|
Quote:
Related, are teams allowed to offer QOs to players who decline a player option? I know we can offer a QO to players with vesting options where they fail to vest. |
|
01-03-2014, 02:58 PM | #28 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The big smoke
Posts: 15,628
|
The AI would have released him or traded him for a pot of pine tar long before it got to the QO.
__________________
Cheers RichW #stopthestupid “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit |
01-04-2014, 06:55 PM | #29 |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 1,736
|
Compensation for unsigned pick also appears incorrect.
in didn't sign the 40th pick overall round 2, no.4 i now was awarded next year round 2 no.5. I believe the CBA rules say i should get no.41 next year. added: yep. In 2012 Mets didn't sign Teddy Stankiewicz, 15th pick round 2 (75th overall). This year they got pick 76 to compensate, which was actually in the 3rd round Last edited by le receveur; 01-04-2014 at 06:59 PM. |
01-04-2014, 11:25 PM | #30 | |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 345
|
Quote:
|
|
01-04-2014, 11:51 PM | #31 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Up There
Posts: 15,386
|
Quote:
It has been pointed out before, but unfortunately, due to the way the draft was coded, the "draft pick plus one" compensation selection couldn't be done that way. Thus the way OOTP does it instead. Maybe that can be changed for OOTP 15. Time will tell... |
|
01-05-2014, 12:32 AM | #32 |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 1,736
|
thanks. interesting that they would not have put it in the new CBA specifically, especially with the other change to protection (2 years).
(but i guess since it affects players who are not yet part of the union, they didn't really care) Last edited by le receveur; 01-05-2014 at 12:35 AM. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|