Bickering in clubhouse - Page 5

Orcin · 08-10-2015, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolfman21

I've got a clubhouse full of a great mix of guys. A couple guys with high leadership, no guys with incredibly low leadership. No real low work ethic guys. No really greedy guys. Nobody with crappy personalities...everyone is "Has high work ethic" or "just one of the guys" type dudes. And yet everyone is pissed off about "disruptive influences on the team". And its not just my major league squad. ALL of my farm system has this too. Also, every player I try and trade for is angry about something. It seems to be a bug.

You have a player who is "outspoken". In editor terms, his controversy rating is really high. In personality description, it will say something like "not shy about expressing his opinions".

Matt Arnold · 08-10-2015, 01:41 PM

"Disruptive influences" are more likely a guy who's a true clubhouse cancer. If you read through the personalities it should be clear who it is.

RchW · 08-10-2015, 06:14 PM

I'm not a fan of something that encourages looking in the editor. I just don't see the point.

T-Bone · 12-02-2015, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kronos

Was he on the 40 man roster? wondering if the game considers that to be the club house instead of the active roster.

Did we ever get an answer to this as I am having a similar problem.

Matt Arnold · 12-02-2015, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T-Bone

Did we ever get an answer to this as I am having a similar problem.

The daily updating only counts those players on the active roster. But keep in mind, generally speaking, in Spring and after September callups, the active roster gets extended, so sometimes those players who are on the 40-man roster can cause problems.

If players complain during the season, only those on the active roster are considered. So if they say there's a disruptive influence, then it's a guy on the 25-man not the 40 who's causing problems (although keep in mind that not everyone might complain for the same reason, and that if you win, that should generally solve other problems).

SodoMojo · 12-05-2015, 08:58 PM

Surprised to see so many perceived issues with this. In my experience, it's not hard to figure out who the cancers are on your team by simply reading the personality blurb. Statements are pretty straight forward. Have not experienced 40 man roster issues either.

I don't think it's as in depth as the original poster mentions...certain players having certain issues with certain types of players. Nah, more like if a guy is a cancer some people can deal with it...others can't.

I kinda like the feature...and oddly enough it feels like one of the more black and white additions in a "under the hood" type of simulation game.

Scottiedog43 · 12-06-2015, 02:41 AM

I personally like the morale option. It allows for deeper immersion into the game IMO.
Also, not to steal the thread Steve509. I noticed your avatar....I was Air Assault in the Marines man. I'd rather slide down a rope.....I never wanted to jump out of a plane lol.

JaBurns · 12-06-2015, 10:39 AM

Have the same problem cannot seem to find the cause, enjoying going through this thread for the ideas; next step is to look at the manager. The level of detail in this game is incredibly and to think it is only going to get better in the future! I'm thinking that this is the best $ I have ever spent on a simulation game! I have spent a pile of $ over the past 35 years.

jbsnadb · 12-28-2015, 12:46 PM

I have been around the franchise for quite some time, but just recently picked up OOTP 16. I love the level of detail that features like this bring, as it makes me look deeper as a GM at players I'm considering bringing in. It may be a pain to some, but makes things much more realistic, especially since the personality runs through the staff as well.

I, too, am experiencing an issue as Manager only. I have an entire roster being brought down because of issues with some players in the clubhouse. One of the guys on my roster is described as a "Clubhouse Cancer" (wasn't hard to find him, eh?). Problem is, as the manager, I can't get rid of him. Does anyone know of any plans where you can somehow bring this type of thing to the attention of the AI GM? This guy is a reliever, so his "benching" is not something I can obviously do.

Any advise is greatly appreciated.

08-10-2015, 06:14 PM	#83
RchW Hall Of Famer Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: The big smoke Posts: 15,628	I'm not a fan of something that encourages looking in the editor. I just don't see the point. __________________ Cheers RichW If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks. “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit

12-05-2015, 08:58 PM	#86
SodoMojo Minors (Double A) Join Date: Apr 2013 Posts: 136	Surprised to see so many perceived issues with this. In my experience, it's not hard to figure out who the cancers are on your team by simply reading the personality blurb. Statements are pretty straight forward. Have not experienced 40 man roster issues either. I don't think it's as in depth as the original poster mentions...certain players having certain issues with certain types of players. Nah, more like if a guy is a cancer some people can deal with it...others can't. I kinda like the feature...and oddly enough it feels like one of the more black and white additions in a "under the hood" type of simulation game. Last edited by SodoMojo; 12-05-2015 at 08:59 PM.

12-06-2015, 02:41 AM	#87
Scottiedog43 Major Leagues Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: Proud Texan Posts: 445	I personally like the morale option. It allows for deeper immersion into the game IMO. Also, not to steal the thread Steve509. I noticed your avatar....I was Air Assault in the Marines man. I'd rather slide down a rope.....I never wanted to jump out of a plane lol. __________________ “Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.” George Carlin

12-06-2015, 10:39 AM	#88
JaBurns All Star Starter Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Kelowna, British Columbia Posts: 1,266	Club House Discontent Have the same problem cannot seem to find the cause, enjoying going through this thread for the ideas; next step is to look at the manager. The level of detail in this game is incredibly and to think it is only going to get better in the future! I'm thinking that this is the best $ I have ever spent on a simulation game! I have spent a pile of $ over the past 35 years.

12-28-2015, 12:46 PM	#89
jbsnadb All Star Starter Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 1,098	I have been around the franchise for quite some time, but just recently picked up OOTP 16. I love the level of detail that features like this bring, as it makes me look deeper as a GM at players I'm considering bringing in. It may be a pain to some, but makes things much more realistic, especially since the personality runs through the staff as well. I, too, am experiencing an issue as Manager only. I have an entire roster being brought down because of issues with some players in the clubhouse. One of the guys on my roster is described as a "Clubhouse Cancer" (wasn't hard to find him, eh?). Problem is, as the manager, I can't get rid of him. Does anyone know of any plans where you can somehow bring this type of thing to the attention of the AI GM? This guy is a reliever, so his "benching" is not something I can obviously do. Any advise is greatly appreciated. __________________ "And as I wander with my music through the jungles of Despair, my kid will learn guitar and find a street corner somewhere. There he'll make the silence listen to the dream behind the voice, and show his minstrel Hamlet daddy that there only was one choice."

08-10-2015, 01:41 PM	#82
Matt Arnold OOTP Developer Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Here and there Posts: 14,143	"Disruptive influences" are more likely a guy who's a true clubhouse cancer. If you read through the personalities it should be clear who it is.