Injury Scouting - lots of "very durable"

BKL · 10-08-2017, 07:33 PM

I am playing a customized game. I noticed that under scouting about 80% of the players as a strength are said to be "very durable" yet when I look at their body chart, they often have a lot of red. In fact, in one case a player was total red and it said a strength is that he is "very durable."

Am I looking at this wrong?

JeffR · 10-08-2017, 07:57 PM

Do you remember which player it was? I'm guessing there may be a problem with what ranges of the rating get attached to what description, but it'll help to have a specific example. Doesn't sound like it's completely reversed (since 80% of players won't be very injury-prone, either), but something's not right.

BKL · 10-08-2017, 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JeffR

Do you remember which player it was? I'm guessing there may be a problem with what ranges of the rating get attached to what description, but it'll help to have a specific example. Doesn't sound like it's completely reversed (since 80% of players won't be very injury-prone, either), but something's not right.

I am playing a customized league with an initial draft, all fictional players. I did a random spot check across the league and would say that about 80% of all players I randomly looked at say "very durable" as a strength under scouting, while many of them have red body parts. Seems like this might be an issue with fictional players created in a customized league.

JeffR · 10-08-2017, 11:43 PM

Upload the save and I'll have a look, I should be able to see if it's a player generation issue or one with the ratings descriptions.

BKL · 10-09-2017, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JeffR

Upload the save and I'll have a look, I should be able to see if it's a player generation issue or one with the ratings descriptions.

Just uploaded it as "BKL FHM4". I also included the subfolders that include scounting .dat files.

Thanks!

BKL · 10-14-2017, 01:05 PM

I noticed this still is an issue. I just started a new standard game. I'm seeing "very durable" with the vast majority of players under their scouting (and since this is a standard game, I assume it's the same for everyone else....also seeing this in custom games). As an example, you can see in the picture below a relatively older player, with a serious injury, and also his body picture shows him being very vulnerable, yet, his scouting says he's "very durable."

JeffR · 10-14-2017, 05:41 PM

Yeah, it looks like it's a problem with the ranges being used for the durability descriptions, we'll get it fixed.

10-08-2017, 07:33 PM	#1
BKL All Star Reserve Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 921	Injury Scouting - lots of "very durable" I am playing a customized game. I noticed that under scouting about 80% of the players as a strength are said to be "very durable" yet when I look at their body chart, they often have a lot of red. In fact, in one case a player was total red and it said a strength is that he is "very durable." Am I looking at this wrong?

10-08-2017, 11:43 PM	#4
JeffR FHM Producer Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Kelowna, BC Posts: 16,625	Upload the save and I'll have a look, I should be able to see if it's a player generation issue or one with the ratings descriptions. Last edited by JeffR; 10-09-2017 at 02:10 AM.

10-14-2017, 01:05 PM	#6
BKL All Star Reserve Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 921	I noticed this still is an issue. I just started a new standard game. I'm seeing "very durable" with the vast majority of players under their scouting (and since this is a standard game, I assume it's the same for everyone else....also seeing this in custom games). As an example, you can see in the picture below a relatively older player, with a serious injury, and also his body picture shows him being very vulnerable, yet, his scouting says he's "very durable." Attached Images Last edited by BKL; 10-14-2017 at 01:07 PM.

10-08-2017, 07:57 PM	#2
JeffR FHM Producer Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Kelowna, BC Posts: 16,625	Do you remember which player it was? I'm guessing there may be a problem with what ranges of the rating get attached to what description, but it'll help to have a specific example. Doesn't sound like it's completely reversed (since 80% of players won't be very injury-prone, either), but something's not right.

10-14-2017, 05:41 PM	#7
JeffR FHM Producer Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Kelowna, BC Posts: 16,625	Yeah, it looks like it's a problem with the ranges being used for the durability descriptions, we'll get it fixed.