|
||||
|
|
OOTP 14 - General Discussions Discuss the new 2013 version of Out of the Park Baseball here! |
|
Thread Tools |
09-17-2013, 09:03 AM | #1 |
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 29
|
Easy MLB-32 team league expansion?
After half-watching, half-simulating Season 2013, I thought it was a good time to try out an expansion and pick an expansion team to play.
Boston Red Sox won the 2013 world series 4-0 against Detroit Tigers, for anyone curious. Another reason I wanted to change league structure while expanding it to 32 teams was because of the wildcards, which I don't really like at all. I had everything figured out, I planned the Brooklyn Bombers and the Indianapolis Wildcats. I created the following league structure: AL East: Boston, New York (Yankees), Toronto, Cleveland Al Central: Detroit, Chicago (White Sox), Milwaukee, Minnesota Al West: Los Angeles, Seattle, Oakland, Colorado AL South: Texas, Tampa Bay, Kansas City, Baltimore NL East: Philadelphia, New York (Mets), Pittsburg, Brooklyn AL Central: St. Louis, Cincinnati, Chicago (cubs), Indianapolis AL West: Los Angeles, San Francisco, Arizona, San Diego AL South: Washington, Atlanta, Miami, Houston Now, I guess some divisions look slightly off in their geography perhaps. I was OK with it mostly, but then the hard part came and I lost orientation and in the long run gave up. The game automatically creates AAA,AA,etc. But they are all over the place, and I have to manually edit every league up to the rookies to make sense, renaming and replacing everything. I gave up because I couldn't see the forest for the trees. Another point I failed horribly in was I forgot about the Indianapolis Indians and the Brookyln Cyclones, it doesn't make any sense having them part of another organisation while also having MLB Brooklyn and Indianapolis. I guess I have to start over again, scrap Brooklyn and Indianapolis, they don't make any sense. Anyone feel as frustrated as I have with this? Last edited by Crowbar; 09-17-2013 at 11:54 AM. Reason: Atlanta didn't win, was looking at early playoff section afterwards |
09-17-2013, 09:28 AM | #2 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 3,421
|
Sounds kinda similar to what I did. I put expansion teams in Buffalo and Indianapolis, and moved the AAA Indians and Bisons to Evansville and Tallahassee, respectively.
It's not too difficult to change cities around. I keep true-to-life minor leagues, so I had to make sure to switch them to cities that wouldn't have other minor league clubs any time soon, but other than that, no worries. Your divisions don't look that bad at all. Baltimore in the South seems a tiny bit off, but since Washington is in the NL South, it's not too far off. I'd keep 'em as is. Make sure to turn historical off, or it'll foul stuff up when you add non-historical expansion teams.
__________________
https://forums.ootpdevelopments.com/...00&postcount=1 |
09-17-2013, 09:58 AM | #3 | |
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
Only thing that remains is all the other leagues below (AA,A,S A, R), did you find it easy to find good places that don't already have a team and could support such a team? |
|
09-17-2013, 10:50 AM | #4 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 3,421
|
I'm in the mid-to-late 80s. I put AAA American Association teams in Dayton and Grand Rapids (neither of which will have real-life minor league clubs until around the mid-90s), AA Eastern League teams in Worcester and Poughkeepsie, High A California League teams in Sacramento and Needles, Short-season A Northwest League teams in Ogden and Walla Walla, and Rookie teams in Terre Haute, IN and Bloomington, IL.
If those cities won't work - I know Sacramento and Ogden won't in 2013, since they have real teams now - try Canada. Lots of large cities up there with no teams, or only independent league teams. Or even try Latin American cities like San Juan or Havana or someplace a little bit out there like that. Sometimes I go for "biggest city without a minor league team", others just on a whim or whatever. Or towns that used to have a real-life team, but lost it, like Evansville. If you're starting in 2013 and working forward, it should be even easier, since you don't have to worry about whether a town will have a minor league team in the future or not. After this year, who knows, unless you're Nostradamus or something.
__________________
https://forums.ootpdevelopments.com/...00&postcount=1 |
09-17-2013, 10:54 AM | #5 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,541
|
Nice original post; I'd like to expand to 32 teams also; like your set up 4 divisions per AL/NL and 4 teams in each. Just have to decide on locations!
|
09-17-2013, 11:25 AM | #6 |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 728
|
How did the Tigers and Red Sox play in the World Series?
|
09-17-2013, 11:49 AM | #7 | |
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
Boston dominated their division, Tigers did too, but somehow had a giant off-series (however you call it haha) in the World Series. Losing all 4 games in a row is really awful especially if you just mostly dominated the entire season. I didn't really check in detail, but I think some players lost their hot streak and a couple of injuries, mostly in pitching. |
|
09-17-2013, 11:56 AM | #8 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,291
|
Quote:
|
|
09-17-2013, 12:17 PM | #9 | |
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
|
|
09-17-2013, 01:03 PM | #10 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All alone
Posts: 12,612
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
I moved Toronto to Charlotte and added teams in Portland and Salt Lake City
__________________
__________________ Quote:
Five thousand thanks for a non-modder? I never thought I'd see the day. Thank you for your support. |
|
09-17-2013, 01:04 PM | #11 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All alone
Posts: 12,612
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
Think NL. In another five years or so we could have the Astros vs the Dodgers in the World Series.
__________________
__________________ Quote:
Five thousand thanks for a non-modder? I never thought I'd see the day. Thank you for your support. |
|
09-17-2013, 01:53 PM | #12 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Up There
Posts: 15,415
|
Quote:
Note also there's been a trend in recent years for minor league clubs to be located in the suburbs of major cities. |
|
09-17-2013, 01:53 PM | #13 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,541
|
Liking your structure division and 32 team wise I just put together my realignment idea with two expansions
**Note 1: I'm playing as the New York Mets and plan to relocate them to one of the "3 expansion teams". (So one is really a relocate) **Note 2: Kansas City Royals become an NL team; Houston Astros become an NL team again (All states/cities with 2 teams have 1 in AL and one in NL); Hartford/Providence (not sure which yet) become expansion team 1 in the AL; Portland becomes expansion team 2 in the AL; New York Mets relocate to New Orleans (As of now). **Note 3: My only gripe with my set-up as of now is Colorado and Arizona. Want to keep most teams as possible in their respective AL or NL. Arizona is more west and south then Colorado; so where ever they go they at somewhat geographically out of place. Here's how I'm looking; I'm up for changes but wanted to do 3 cities that were on the top 100 metropolitan list in The United States! MLB 32 Team Set-up: American League (AL): North- Chicago White Sox Detroit Tigers Minnesota Twins Toronto Blue Jays South- Baltimore Orioles New Orleans _____ (Relocation) Tampa Bay Rays Texas Rangers East- Boston Red Sox Cleveland Indians Hartford/Providence _____ (Expansion) New York Yankees West- Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim Oakland Athletics Portland ______ (Expansion) Seattle Mariners National League (NL): North- Chicago Cubs Kansas City Royals Milwaukee Brewers St. Louis Cardinals South- Arizona Diamondbacks Atlanta Braves Houston Astros Miami Marlins East- Cincinnati Reds Philadelphia Phillies Pittsburgh Pirates Washington Nationals West- Colorado Rockies Los Angeles Dodgers San Diego Padres San Francisco Giants |
09-17-2013, 03:34 PM | #14 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Under The Christmas Fish
Posts: 7,486
|
The Astros already played the White Sox in the World Series.
|
09-17-2013, 03:58 PM | #15 |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 311
|
" Make sure to turn historical off, or it'll foul stuff up when you add non-historical expansion teams."
I most often play with the current roster set and then add 2 expansion teams at the start of the game. I do not change many settings. Just curious as to what historical messes up? And is it usually "on" as a default setting? |
09-17-2013, 04:04 PM | #16 |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 311
|
" Make sure to turn historical off, or it'll foul stuff up when you add non-historical expansion teams."
I most often play with the current roster set and then add 2 expansion teams at the start of the game. I do not change many settings. Just curious as to what historical messes up? And is it usually "on" as a default setting? |
09-17-2013, 04:07 PM | #17 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 3,421
|
I was doing an 1884-? season, and after 1884, when I wanted to move some teams around, it screwed up all kinds of stuff...lost whole teams and their rosters, and kept saying teams existed that I'd deleted or moved. So, basically, that season was ruined. I also had it lose the Toronto Blue Jays and re-do them as a new expansion team in '86, when I tried to do an expansion draft for Indy and Buffalo. Thankfully, I was able to move all the "old" Jays onto the "new" Jays, so that season was still okay.
I think that kind of thing's why "turn off historical" is a big thing (I think there was even one guy here who had that in his avatar or sig, wasn't there?), unless you want to do a COMPLETELY historical recap...no franchise moves or expansion unless it happened in real life. Granted, that was on OOTP 11, and it was also before I completely knew what I was doing, so maybe that's not as big an issue with 14. I just keep it off out of habit now. Once bitten, twice shy. I think it may be okay if you don't plan an expansion draft. If you do, turn it off. I think. Can anybody back me up on this? Like I said, my problems were early on before I knew what I was doing completely, so maybe it was just me!
__________________
https://forums.ootpdevelopments.com/...00&postcount=1 Last edited by ThatSeventiesGuy; 09-17-2013 at 04:12 PM. |
09-17-2013, 04:40 PM | #18 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,541
|
So with what was just said ^^^ is this just when playing historical mode?
With my 32 team idea I posted a few posts up I started off present day with 2013 season; just beginning my second season which its now 2014... planned on expanding in most likely 2016. |
09-17-2013, 08:05 PM | #19 |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 311
|
^^^^^
Thanks for the update. I will keep that in mind if I play back in history!
I always play from 2013 and expand from there (you can guess what team I bring back to life!) by two teams to 32 and have never had any issues. I found OOTP '13 significantly improved the expansion function. Maybe the historical stuff was tackled then too? I used to divide the 32 teams in to four divisions each because I can't stand the wild card. Currently, I have two divisions in each league with the top two qualifying for the play-offs (unbalanced schedule). Building an expansion team never seems to get old for me and this game tops them all. |
09-18-2013, 08:20 AM | #20 |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 161
|
When you expanded to 32 teams, how did you stock the minor leagues for those teams. Auto-fill seems to give those teams a bunch of scrubs. I know Houston is operating with a 12-15 million payroll, but I also find that when you do an expansion draft, the expansion teams select alot of players not ready for the majors. Do your teams go 18-150, or do you bump them up a bit?
I have tried this in the past and notice that it throws the stats out of wack when teams beat up on the expansion teams. |
Bookmarks |
|
|