|
||||
|
|
Perfect Team Perfect Team 2.0 - The online revolution continues! Battle thousands of PT managers from all over the world and become a legend. |
|
Thread Tools |
11-10-2019, 10:26 AM | #1 |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 371
|
Confused
Can some please explain to me how:
A legendary Bert Blyleven is a Cleveland Indian A Legendary Paul Molitor is a Toronto Blue Jay This is what leads me to believe, people know very little about the history of baseball, but because they understand sabermetrics, they believe they are a baseball expert. |
11-10-2019, 11:42 AM | #2 |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 762
|
You aren't likely to get many helpful responses when you insult stats-oriented folks on the forum for a stats-oriented game.
__________________
|
11-10-2019, 12:44 PM | #3 | |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 371
|
Quote:
Paul Molitor is a Brewer not a Blue Jay Blyleven is a Twin not an Indian Then My comment is a fact and 100% correct. In case no one ever told you: Facts don't care about your FEELINGS. |
|
11-10-2019, 12:52 PM | #4 |
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 204
|
Just a wild guess here but maybe the Molitor card is based from 93-95 on his Peak seasons with the Blue Jays?
__________________
|
11-10-2019, 12:52 PM | #5 |
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 234
|
maybe the cards are based on their performance at those teams? Blyleven had an excellent season in his time with the Indians and Molitor had 2 excellent seasons in his stint with the Jays, why can't they have cards for those years?
__________________
F2P Team |
11-10-2019, 12:56 PM | #6 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 9,943
|
yeah, I can see that.... the "legendary" card should be with the team where the player spent the bulk of their career (imho).... if it were my choices, the the Molitor-Toronto card would have been an 'all-star' addition for 1993; while his Legendary-Peak card would have had the 1987 year tagged to it in Milwaukee (though the Peak cards are typically a merge of best seasons).... and the Blyleven-Cleveland card would have been based off his 1985 season, with his legendary-peak card as a Twin
and hey, that can always change from year to year as the devs get feedback/etc; so never know what might happen in the next version |
11-10-2019, 01:15 PM | #7 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 11,886
|
How about alternative feelings?
__________________
Portland Raccoons, 83 years of excell-.... of baseball: Furballs here! 1983 * 1989 * 1991 * 1992 * 1993 * 1995 * 1996 * 2010 * 2017 * 2018 * 2019 * 2026 * 2028 * 2035 * 2037 * 2044 * 2045 * 2046 * 2047 * 2048 * 2051 * 2054 * 2055 1 OSANAI : 2 POWELL : 7 NOMURA | RAMOS : 8 REECE : 10 BROWN : 15 HALL : 27 FERNANDEZ : 28 CASAS : 31 CARMONA : 32 WEST : 39 TONER : 46 SAITO Resident Mets Cynic - The Mets from 1962 onwards, here. |
11-10-2019, 01:17 PM | #8 |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 762
|
The stats you whine about agree that Molitor's best seasons were as a Brewer and Blyleven's were as a Twin. It's a flaw of the game, not of stats people. But if you want to be lazy and be the old man yelling at a cloud, go for it.
__________________
|
11-10-2019, 01:30 PM | #9 | |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 371
|
Quote:
You needed to use sabermetric stats to agree with me. So what does that tell us? I'm not "Lazy" as you stated I was. I'm just smarter than you. Thanks for playing. Better luck next time. |
|
11-10-2019, 01:39 PM | #10 | |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 762
|
Quote:
I agreed with your point about the cards being tied to the wrong teams. Just pointing out that it's not for the reason you thought. You clearly have a bias against stats, and blamed that without looking deeper. That's what made you lazy.
__________________
|
|
11-10-2019, 01:43 PM | #11 | |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 371
|
Quote:
What I was saying is this: People who know very little or nothing about baseball think they are baseball experts because they know Sabermetric stats. This is how mistakes on said cards happen. Sorry for the confusion. |
|
11-10-2019, 01:56 PM | #12 | |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 762
|
Quote:
Sorry for perhaps being too defensive.
__________________
|
|
11-10-2019, 02:54 PM | #13 |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 371
|
This example is why, (To me), a lot of sabermetrics stats are flawed and meaningless.
In 1980 the Philadelphia Phillies won the World Series. Pete Rose's WAR score in 1980 was -0.4. Anyone with 2 or more brain cells when it comes to baseball would tell you: Without Pete Rose, the Philadelphia Phillies would not have even made the Playoffs that year. Some sabermetric statistics are severely flawed, such as WAR. Yet people with little baseball knowledge Use said stat to make personal decisions. |
11-10-2019, 02:55 PM | #14 |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 121
|
I totally agree with the sentiment. A lot of the legends cards appear to be for the wrong teams. The worst offender IMO is Curt Schilling, who spent a long time in Philly and had his best seasons in Philly and Arizona, yet is somehow a Red Sox card.
However, the OP was pointlessly rude and confrontational about the subject, so I wouldn't blame the devs for totally ignoring his point. How you say something and how you make people feel is just as important as what you say, often more so. This is what leads me to believe, people know very little about how to talk to others, but because they understand the English language, they believe they are a rhetoric expert.
__________________
|
11-10-2019, 09:23 PM | #15 |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,782
|
Well hey, they played for both teams in both cases. Sometimes a player will have more than one card. And each of these cards is a little different. I've griped about cards exactly three times...? lol...Sometimes your point of view just doesn't line up with the game. But they are just people too so it makes sense that we'd have our differences.
__________________
|
11-10-2019, 09:26 PM | #16 |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,782
|
Apparently timing is rather important for correcting any perceived errors. There was a post dedicated to pointing out errors with the cards before the game was released...I came in pointing out the errors after this post was closed down and the seasons underway so keep an eye out for it before the next release I suppose.
|
11-10-2019, 09:36 PM | #17 |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,782
|
One of the things about a democratic environment is we end up with 8,000 and counting different opinions. So it's rather chaotic sometimes without some proper way to process all the different opinions.
__________________
|
11-11-2019, 12:17 AM | #18 | |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 560
|
Quote:
I'll also note that your original complaint of e.g. Blyleven's PEAK card being an Indian has absolutely nothing to do with sabermetrics whatsoever. I am not sure you fully understand what sabermetrics are, or what they're used for, or how they're used, or why people use them.
__________________
Former leader of BFF, the definitive competitive PT group for F2P players. DM for info F2P + restrictions. First F2P winner of PT21 Perfect League F2P + restrictions. New team -> PT title in 8 weeks Last edited by QuantaCondor; 11-11-2019 at 12:19 AM. |
|
11-11-2019, 01:00 AM | #19 |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,782
|
Maybe his point is that they're not the only thing that matters & that analysis and decisions are made & have been made differently in the '60s, '70s, '80s, '90s and now... Jeter is another example of a player who clearly defied sabermetrics. They're a pretty impressive tool but the popularity of them doesn't make them the best way to make decisions necessarily. Every time they will tell you that the players who performed best were best and should be in there. But they are designed that way, almost to look good. But that's after the fact, not an ability to scout players who have yet to play. Or maybe have not put up their best numbers yet but potentially could be the best option in the future. In the modern environment, so many players are not even in the discussion that don't get a chance to play.
Then again the talent pool is almost flooded with prospects today. Wouldn't be an interesting exercise if we had to pick our players for PT 23 or 24 this winter from minor leaguers and other prospects who have yet to play Major League Baseball? And if the MLB scouts and other pieces of the franchise keep a player off the diamond, how can we judge his skills?
__________________
Last edited by One Great Matrix; 11-11-2019 at 01:10 AM. |
11-11-2019, 01:01 AM | #20 | |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Wichita Falls, TX
Posts: 1,328
|
Quote:
Sabermetrics is an analytical approach and a process. The most famous sabermetric stat, WAR, is a non-standardized metric that has no single established calculation. Even in this new age of statistical importance, teams believe their unique proprietary sabermetric analysis will be able to discover flaws in the valuation of players by other teams. However, flawed does not imply a lack of significance or meaning.
__________________
"And, Masters, do not forget to specify, when time and place shall serve, that I am an [censored]." (Much Ado About Nothing 5.1.255-256) Primary Team Collection Rewards (Cards & Packs) F2P Theme Team Movers F2P Theme and Adam Schlesinger Memorial Team |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|