|
||||
|
03-28-2007, 06:06 AM | #21 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Frankfort, Kentucky
Posts: 3,739
|
Quote:
What do you think when you get down to the specific results?
__________________
Charlie Root won more games for the Cubs than any pitcher (201), yet was remembered for one pitch to Babe Ruth. Find out more about the 1929 World Series in my book, "Root for the Cubs: Charlie Root and the 1929 Chicago Cubs." See the web site at www.rootforthecubs.com. The book is at http://www.amazon.com/Root-Cubs-Char...t+for+the+cubs. Beta tester, OOTP 2007-2023 and iOOTP 2011-2014. |
|
03-28-2007, 09:03 AM | #22 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Lonely Mountain
Posts: 2,509
|
Quote:
__________________
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies." -- C.S. Lewis |
|
03-28-2007, 03:49 PM | #23 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Troy, Mo
Posts: 6,251
|
Quote:
Thank you! |
|
03-28-2007, 05:53 PM | #24 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Frankfort, Kentucky
Posts: 3,739
|
Quote:
Almost any idea you can think of, there's a way to modify or customize it within your own game settings.
__________________
Charlie Root won more games for the Cubs than any pitcher (201), yet was remembered for one pitch to Babe Ruth. Find out more about the 1929 World Series in my book, "Root for the Cubs: Charlie Root and the 1929 Chicago Cubs." See the web site at www.rootforthecubs.com. The book is at http://www.amazon.com/Root-Cubs-Char...t+for+the+cubs. Beta tester, OOTP 2007-2023 and iOOTP 2011-2014. |
|
03-28-2007, 05:55 PM | #25 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Frankfort, Kentucky
Posts: 3,739
|
What WebComedian is saying is that if you leave historic drafts at the default date, it brings rookies into the draft one year ahead of their debut. If you move the draft date back to the post-season, like Nov. 1, it brings their data in from their real first year of stats.
__________________
Charlie Root won more games for the Cubs than any pitcher (201), yet was remembered for one pitch to Babe Ruth. Find out more about the 1929 World Series in my book, "Root for the Cubs: Charlie Root and the 1929 Chicago Cubs." See the web site at www.rootforthecubs.com. The book is at http://www.amazon.com/Root-Cubs-Char...t+for+the+cubs. Beta tester, OOTP 2007-2023 and iOOTP 2011-2014. |
03-28-2007, 08:30 PM | #26 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Troy, Mo
Posts: 6,251
|
Quote:
|
|
03-28-2007, 10:02 PM | #27 |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 599
|
when players are imported into their league, are their initial rookie ratings based on the next 3 years of stats if the base is set to 3 or are they based on their career?
|
03-29-2007, 03:16 PM | #28 |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 599
|
bump, surely someone knows.
|
03-29-2007, 04:12 PM | #29 | |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,283
|
Quote:
edit: OTOH, there are some players whose import ratings suggest it's the 3 year thing. It's difficult to see quite how it works, consistently.
__________________
In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act. George Orwell Last edited by redmarkYankees; 03-29-2007 at 04:35 PM. |
|
03-29-2007, 04:49 PM | #30 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 2,435
|
Quote:
Wouldn't it make more sense and be more accurate to import 3 years of stats and base the ratings on the cumulative total of those three years?!? So if a player had 600 at-bats in year 1 and 3 and batted .300 and then was injured and only batted .100 in 60 at-bats in year 2, he would get a rating based on his 366 hits / 1260 at-bats = .290 average instead of say ratings of (9 + 1 + 9) / 3 = 6. I realize this is an extreme example, but I am shaking my head as I grasp how the recalc actually works...
__________________
Roll out the barrel! |
|
03-29-2007, 05:02 PM | #31 | |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 599
|
Quote:
|
|
03-29-2007, 10:06 PM | #32 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Lonely Mountain
Posts: 2,509
|
Quote:
__________________
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies." -- C.S. Lewis |
|
03-29-2007, 11:12 PM | #33 |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 112
|
It seems like they should be taken cumulatively. But I'm having trouble figuring out if it does it that way or not. My sense is that a lot of guys are rated a bit high for their first year. I am using a 3-year recalc, for example, and Stan Hack with a 111 contact rating according to the editor. The real Stan Hack had 178 ABs as a rookie and hit .236. This right off the bat suggest to me that first-year players, if you use a multi-year recalc, are including the second and third years. This actually kinda bugs me because it means first year players are often stronger than it "feels" that the should be.
Hack hit .350 in his second season in just 60 at bats which means the ratings for this year should have been adjuted downward as well. He hit .289 in his third year. Taken independently and then averaged, it doesn't seem to me like those years would result in a relatively solid contact rating of 111. That's just one example I happened to notice, though. For every one of those there seems to be a Hal Trosky, who got a contact rating of 60/250 even though he hit .330 in his second real season. Last edited by Matches; 03-29-2007 at 11:19 PM. |
04-02-2007, 11:56 AM | #34 | |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,991
|
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|