|
||||
|
|
OOTP 19 - General Discussions Everything about the 2018 version of Out of the Park Baseball - officially licensed by MLB.com and the MLBPA. |
|
Thread Tools |
10-14-2018, 04:15 PM | #81 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 9,798
|
Quote:
|
|
10-15-2018, 06:47 PM | #82 |
Hall Of Famer
|
yes, but the incentive to spend more to improve your organization is now gone...as is the need to even hire a scouting director...While I like the consistancy of 100% accurate ratings, I like the challenge of scouting also. I just wish they could fix the problem with inconsistent reports.
|
10-15-2018, 07:18 PM | #83 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 9,798
|
Quote:
I am not looking to spend more to improve my organization vs. the AI. I am looking to make the AI more competitive to get some challenge into the game. Your approach may be different and that's fine. |
|
10-15-2018, 07:42 PM | #84 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,134
|
FWIW, I've rationalized turning scouting off by explaining to myself that Talent Change Randomness (TCR) negates any advantage (or disadvantage) I would get through scouting. Essentially, it doesn't matter how good or bad my scout is...TCR impacts how likely a player will reach or exceed their original potential anyway.
__________________
GM - New Jersey Bears of the NPBL; |
10-16-2018, 09:56 PM | #85 | |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,313
|
Quote:
|
|
10-24-2018, 07:44 PM | #87 |
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 30
|
I don't have it checked as I like to see their rating based on the position. Sometimes I'll assign the player to different positions to see how the ratings change.
Now that I'm typing this - I'm not sure I'll keep it unchecked. I tend to look heavy at defense potential anyway so I'm not sure I'm learning much - and possibly losing something - by comparing to position specific. Other peoples experience? Last edited by Trauma One; 10-27-2018 at 04:00 PM. |
10-24-2018, 08:05 PM | #88 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,134
|
Quote:
using that option seems to help AI with salary too...though I honestly have no proof of that...just my eyeball gut feel.
__________________
GM - New Jersey Bears of the NPBL; |
|
10-24-2018, 10:11 PM | #89 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 9,798
|
I use it to downgrade the relievers and prevent outfielders from changing ratings when they change positions. I suspect that it helps the AI too, but I don’t have any evidence to support that.
|
10-26-2018, 03:25 PM | #91 |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 438
|
I used to not check it and did the shifting of positions to see how ratings changed. I do now, though, primarily because I did not like the RP ratings relative to other players. How many RP’s legitimately rate as an 80 in MLB versus the entirety of major league players? 2-4 maybe? Yes, a Kimbrel or Jansen or Chapman can be of relative importance to winning an equal to a start SP or batter, but there are very few of those guys. I like seeing RP’s more appropriately valued as a lot of 35-65 guys, with a few above that.
|
10-28-2018, 06:35 PM | #92 |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 922
|
Do y'all use the same settings regardless of league type (fiction vs real)?
|
03-22-2019, 02:04 PM | #93 |
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 30
|
batters age .200
wow |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|