Home | Webstore
Latest News: OOTP 25 Available - FHM 10 Available - OOTP Go! Available

Out of the Park Baseball 25 Buy Now!

  

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Prior Versions of Our Games > Out of the Park Baseball 19 > Perfect Team

Perfect Team Discover the new amazing online league competition & card collecting mode of OOTP!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-16-2018, 02:51 PM   #1
nop990
Bat Boy
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 4
Exclamation Concern about Perfect Team's Monetization

Preface
I have played OOTP since OOTP 16. I have played video games since the age of 4. Much of this post is my opinion based on my experiences as a consumer in this industry and based on my definition of what is right. Many of you will disagree with me, and that is fine.

Perfect Team and the Issue of Paid Card Packs
Perfect Team is an exciting new concept for OOTP, and I am sure many of you guys have played other sports games with Ultimate Team and similar modes. However, I have a major problem with monetizing the points used to buy players and card packs. Firstly, there is an issue of being able to buy players with real money. This provides an unfair advantage to players that spend money rather than earn the points. Obviously the game still requires some skill and some luck, but they will have an advantage nonetheless. The second issue I have is the ability to spend these purchased points on card packs, which are a type of loot box. I do commend OOTP Developments for taking the initiative to show the percentage chances of each type of card. However, this system is still gambling. There is a growing controversy around loot boxes. A few European countries such as Belgium have already legally declared them as gambling and forced their removal from all video games sold in that country. They are even taking EA to court over the issue. Several other countries in the EU are also coming together to form a commission to investigate the predatory nature of loot boxes and to discuss legislation against them. It has even spread to the US, where many officials, such as Hawaiian Representative Chris Lee are demanding that the government take action. It disappoints me greatly that OOTP Developments would want to implement a system like this when there is no way they aren't at least aware of the stigma surrounding it. Yes, OOTP Developments is a small studio that makes games for niche markets. Yes, they need to make money. However, that is no excuse to stoop to this level of predatory monetization that plagues this industry.

TLDR
Loot Boxes are gambling, they should not be in an E-rated sports video game.

Suggestions
Charge 5-10 bucks for Perfect Team as a DLC-type add-on instead. The hype for this mode is crazy and I guarantee that most people excited for this mode would happily pay that. I know I would.

Conclusion
Studios should strive to be the next CD Projekt Red, not the next EA. Strive to make great games that people love, not to put as much money in your pockets as possible.

Thank you for reading my post; any response is welcomed, whether it be an agreement or a rebuttal.
nop990 is offline  
Old 10-16-2018, 10:44 PM   #2
JaytheGreat
Minors (Rookie Ball)
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Michigan
Posts: 47
I understand your points but I don't agree. I am very excited for the release of Perfect Team even though I don't plan on spending a dime on it. I've played FIFA, NCAA 14, and Madden's Ultimate Team's and I do enjoy these types of game modes. Markus has talked about the different divisions, so I'd have to assume the people who drop money into the game will be at the higher levels early on until people catch up. This isn't as bad as say the EA Stars Wars series were you have to get so many parts of Darth Vader to use him, and you can either drop money or grind an incredible amount of hours trying to get enough xp to earn the loot boxes. Spending money doesn't even grant you a certain card it just gives you better chances of getting good cards. The biggest problem with the predatory nature of the loot boxes is because of the games they are in are played by kids ie Madden, FIFA, Star Wars, I don't know the different demographics that play OOTP but I'd assume most of us are adults that know what to expect if they choose to buy packs with money. All in all I'm excited for the beta and the release, and I'd give it a chance 1st to see what it's like.

Last edited by JaytheGreat; 10-16-2018 at 10:52 PM.
JaytheGreat is offline  
Old 10-17-2018, 12:57 AM   #3
Orcin
Hall Of Famer
 
Orcin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 9,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by nop990 View Post
I have played OOTP since OOTP 16.
Yet this is your first forum post.


Quote:
Originally Posted by nop990 View Post
Thank you for reading my post; any response is welcomed, whether it be an agreement or a rebuttal.
The OOTPD model allows players to spend nothing and still get the extra content.

Using your model, everyone has to pay an additional fee. Using their model, people choose what they want to pay. That seems more fair to me.
Orcin is offline  
Old 10-17-2018, 01:10 AM   #4
TGH-Adfabre
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,599
Customers seem to like Skinner boxes over linear rewards.
__________________
You mock me, therefore I am
My wife
TGH-Adfabre is offline  
Old 10-17-2018, 06:07 PM   #5
Westheim
Hall Of Famer
 
Westheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 11,806
Some people like baseball.
__________________
Portland Raccoons, 83 years of excell-.... of baseball: Furballs here!
1983 * 1989 * 1991 * 1992 * 1993 * 1995 * 1996 * 2010 * 2017 * 2018 * 2019 * 2026 * 2028 * 2035 * 2037 * 2044 * 2045 * 2046 * 2047 * 2048 * 2051 * 2054 * 2055
1 OSANAI : 2 POWELL : 7 NOMURA | RAMOS : 8 REECE : 10 BROWN : 15 HALL : 27 FERNANDEZ : 28 CASAS : 31 CARMONA : 32 WEST : 39 TONER : 46 SAITO

Resident Mets Cynic - The Mets from 1962 onwards, here.
Westheim is offline  
Old 10-17-2018, 06:38 PM   #6
RchW
Hall Of Famer
 
RchW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The big smoke
Posts: 15,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orcin View Post
Yet this is your first forum post.




The OOTPD model allows players to spend nothing and still get the extra content.

Using your model, everyone has to pay an additional fee. Using their model, people choose what they want to pay. That seems more fair to me.
I completely agree. I'm not likely to use Perfect Team and even if I do less likely to pay. Having said that I know that my kids generation pays to play and it is a free choice. OOTPD are a special company in my opinion. They have consistently given me value for money and I 100% support any endeavour they undertake to increase sales dollars. That income will be used to improve several product offerings especially the Football game which has me very exited.

I have worked almost 30 years in a business that involves long term relationships and trust. I feel about OOTPD the way I hope my many long time customers feel about me.
__________________
Cheers

RichW

#stopthestupid

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit
RchW is offline  
Old 10-17-2018, 08:38 PM   #7
mitchkenn
Hall Of Famer
 
mitchkenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Oregon, not by design
Posts: 2,853
old retired on limited income. doesn't mean i won't play PT. (doesn't mean i will) it does mean i won't buy card packs. so if i decide to play - it means i'll be in a lower bracket. maybe a more even bracket than the people who will buy top packets. i understand the choices to be made by consumers on how they will play the game, understand the company's plan and effort to make this fair and interesting at the same time. it's not out yet. it's in beta testing. How it rolls out and exactly what it will and will not be viewed as by the buying audience remains to be seen. But i would not pay extra for this feature, just to try it. i think Markus and team has thus far made some good choices on presentation and development, once they decided they wanted to develop this feature.

so basically, i disagree with the premise of the OP.
__________________
"This is my opening farewell " - Jackson Browne
“They make a desolation and call it peace.” ― Agha Shahid Ali
"Maybe she just has to sing, for the sake of the song - And who do I think that I am to decide that she's wrong." - Townes Van Zandt
"I saw a young man leaning on his wooden crutch - He called out to me, 'Don't ask for so much' And a young woman leaning in her darkened door She cried out to me, 'Why not ask for more?' " - Leonard Cohen
"Hello darkness, my old Friend ...." - Paul Simon
Before Mays, before DiMaggio, there was Oscar Charleston.
"All the lies about Babe Ruth are true." - Waite Hoyt

Avatar is the late great Townes Van Zandt. rip.
mitchkenn is offline  
Old 10-18-2018, 02:37 PM   #8
spartacus007
Minors (Triple A)
 
spartacus007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 221
I agree with the OP that there ARE legitimate concerns about "loot boxes" in gaming, including games aimed at children. But I don't think OOTP's Perfect Team has a "predatory nature" in the way "loot boxes" incorporated into some bigger-name video games may be.

For one, I can completely ignore Perfect Team and still experience the main game just fine with no drawbacks or restrictions.

It also looks like the OOTP team has a goal of making sure owners who don't pay are competitive and have a realistic chance of winning games. (Unlike say, MLB The Show 18)

I have no problem with OOTP trying to put as much money in their pockets as possible, as long as they do it ethically and don't break the game I already have and love. I think that's their goal too.

FWIW, there were lawsuits filed against the makers of physical baseball cards a couple decades ago, liking them to gambling. The lawsuits failed.
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-5th-circuit/1097140.html
http://www.metnews.com/articles/duma120601.htm
__________________
https://pt25.ootpdevelopments.com/ptsignatures/spartacus007.jpg

Historical Mode:
OOTP 24 (Challenge Mode)
⚾ 1901-19 Reds: 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🏆🏆🏆🏆
FHM 10
🏒 1909-18 Wanderers: 🏆
🏒 1918-19: Arenas/St. Patricks: 🏆🏆
spartacus007 is offline  
Old 10-18-2018, 03:11 PM   #9
Markus Heinsohn
Developer OOTP
 
Markus Heinsohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 24,709
Of course there are concerns about the issue of "loot boxes" and many games out there are simply designed to push users to spend as much money as possible. Our goal is to design Perfect Team in a way that you can have a lot of fun and be very competitive without spending a dime. Hence the opening post and its concerns does not apply to Perfect Team.

But, I know some people may think different, and feel PT is "pay to win". No matter what I say, I would not be able to convince them otherwise, so I won't waste time in even trying.

Will you be able to spend money in PT? Yes. Do you have to? No. Will you be able to field a competitive team without spending money? Yes. That's all what's relevant, from my point of view
Markus Heinsohn is offline  
Old 10-18-2018, 05:52 PM   #10
el_gringo
Minors (Triple A)
 
el_gringo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by spartacus007 View Post
I agree with the OP that there ARE legitimate concerns about "loot boxes" in gaming, including games aimed at children. But I don't think OOTP's Perfect Team has a "predatory nature" in the way "loot boxes" incorporated into some bigger-name video games may be.

For one, I can completely ignore Perfect Team and still experience the main game just fine with no drawbacks or restrictions.
There are several categories of concern, and it's important to speak to each. Some games are more or less psychologically 'coercive' or manipulative, and OOTP's PT mode certainly falls on the less-coercive side of that spectrum as far as pay-to-win systems go. It is completely optional, has a multi-tiered league structure, does not exploit the worst monetization methods employed by many other games, etc.

Another concern, which has been more of a focus of lawsuits as I understand it, is preying on those with actual gambling addictions and/or those who don't know better (children, etc.). I'm sure OOTP has done all the legal and ethical due diligence on this, and has a plan to deal with transactions that seem to indicate this sort of behavior might be occurring. They have far too much to lose by ignoring the importance of all of that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spartacus007 View Post

It also looks like the OOTP team has a goal of making sure owners who don't pay are competitive and have a realistic chance of winning games. (Unlike say, MLB The Show 18)
This, I think, is the trickier piece. It all hinges on your own interpretation of the word 'competitive.' More on this at the bottom, as Markus speaks to it more directly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spartacus007 View Post

I have no problem with OOTP trying to put as much money in their pockets as possible, as long as they do it ethically and don't break the game I already have and love. I think that's their goal too.
I agree 100%, and think they're doing a great job of ethically maximizing revenues.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spartacus007 View Post

FWIW, there were lawsuits filed against the makers of physical baseball cards a couple decades ago, liking them to gambling. The lawsuits failed.
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-5th-circuit/1097140.html
http://www.metnews.com/articles/duma120601.htm
Not really the same, since those are durable collectibles with (at least potentially) appreciating value in a way these cards will not be after their version is no longer the primary one played. This is paying to have a temporary advantage in a game, which isn't gambling if you don't win money, but utilizes some of the same mechanisms.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Markus Heinsohn View Post
Of course there are concerns about the issue of "loot boxes" and many games out there are simply designed to push users to spend as much money as possible. Our goal is to design Perfect Team in a way that you can have a lot of fun and be very competitive without spending a dime. Hence the opening post and its concerns does not apply to Perfect Team.

But, I know some people may think different, and feel PT is "pay to win". No matter what I say, I would not be able to convince them otherwise, so I won't waste time in even trying.
Markus, if you're genuinely confused/exasperated, it's this: you can't convince them (myself included, in the interest of full disclosure of personal bias) because you keep saying people can be 'very competitive' as F2P players. That's simply a problematic claim for some, given the inherent economic structure of PT. While we understand that you genuinely feel that way, and that there is a lot of marketing pressure to frame the new game mode as such, it just doesn't quite feel right to us.

It's been pretty clear from the outset that there's only one Nash equilibrium here, and I have yet to see evidence to the contrary in the beta.

The whales are probably going to win every top-league World Series except maybe one or two crazy flukey ones every once in a blue moon. They will likely dominate the top several leagues almost entirely, not just the top league. It's probably not going to be a F2P player winning the top prize in 5-10% of seasons (like small market teams do in real life; I don't know the actual stats for MLB, but I'm quite sure it's much higher than what we will see with PT), and it certainly won't be anywhere near half of the time.

This is great in most regards, because it means there will be tons of high-spending players having fun duking it out for the top spot and generating revenue, and the multi-league structure should mean that most F2P players won't be bothered being confined to the lower leagues, as those will still feel fun and satisfying to mess around in (even if being F2P effectively has an upper competitive bound).

But, it's simply not going to feel 'very competitive,' really, for some F2P players. You'll be able to mess around a bit and have fun collecting your favorite low-to-mid tier players and a couple of great superstars, but you'll most likely get bounced down by super-teams pretty quickly once you win a championship or two and get out of the basement leagues. Realistically, the odds you'll ever 'win it all' are almost lottery-slim. The PP accumulation rate won't be sufficient to catch up to the whales no matter what you do (esp. with better players getting better PP returns), as there's no way to get PP other than waiting and spending money.

If you could earn PP consistently by playing the game, more F2P players would think it felt 'very competitive,' but this would decrease the incentive to purchase PP.

If you set up two separate servers/league setups - one F2P and one for all the paying customers - each of the two would definitely feel 'very competitive' to all players, but this second server would decrease revenue and increase costs, not to mention the technical headaches and requirements in time, equipment, etc.

As it is, if just won't feel 'competitive' to some portion of players.

And that's fine.

Most people are having a ton of fun playing 'F2P' in the beta, and I think the mode will probably be a big hit with almost everyone who plays it - just not to those particularly craving a truly competitive, fair game mode. They can play OOTP as they always have (online leagues, solo leagues, etc.) and ignore PT. Sure, it's potentially lost PT user-base, but that'll happen no matter what. If you couldn't stomp F2P teams and other super-teams with your own personal super-team, you'd have fewer whales.

The long-term player retention and revenue metrics will guide the devs, obviously. For now, we are all just speculating on how this will work in a live environment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Markus Heinsohn View Post
Will you be able to spend money in PT? Yes. Do you have to? No. Will you be able to field a competitive team without spending money? Yes. That's all what's relevant, from my point of view
This is indeed the all-relevant crux of the question, and we'll see soon enough. If it doesn't prove true enough, and the player metrics aren't what the devs need to be seeing, they'll figure out what to do about it, whether it be one of the possible remedies mentioned above or some other solution.

Last edited by el_gringo; 10-18-2018 at 05:55 PM.
el_gringo is offline  
Old 10-18-2018, 09:15 PM   #11
Cactusguy21
Major Leagues
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 332
I'm with the OP, I'd vastly prefer a flat rate rather than in-app purchases, but I mean that's just my opinion.
Cactusguy21 is offline  
Old 10-19-2018, 07:44 AM   #12
Markus Heinsohn
Developer OOTP
 
Markus Heinsohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 24,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by el_gringo View Post
Markus, if you're genuinely confused/exasperated, it's this: you can't convince them (myself included, in the interest of full disclosure of personal bias) because you keep saying people can be 'very competitive' as F2P players. That's simply a problematic claim for some, given the inherent economic structure of PT. While we understand that you genuinely feel that way, and that there is a lot of marketing pressure to frame the new game mode as such, it just doesn't quite feel right to us.
Well, it does feel right to me to be honest. Of course, there will be whales, people who spend a lot of money. These will probably end up in the top level (Major Leagues) quicker than others, but the question will be, how many of them will there be? We will have several Major Leagues, and I seriously doubt that there will be so many whales that they fill those league completely. My guess is that the number will be about 10-15% of the Major League teams being whales, and since the difference between a team packed with all diamond cards and a team made of golds and a few diamonds (which will be doable if you have a bit of luck, invest your PP wisely and do a good job managing your team) is not that big (good player cards are pretty close to each other in terms of basic ratings), I am confident that the quote "you can have a lot of fun and be very competitive without spending a dime" will prove to be accurate.
Markus Heinsohn is offline  
Old 10-19-2018, 12:32 PM   #13
Maddox
All Star Reserve
 
Maddox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 903
I just don't see card packs in sports games as gambling. To me gambling has always had possibility of losing all of your investment and getting nothing in return. In these games you are getting something in return for your money, even if it is a pack full of the lowest level cards. In this case I very much equate them with real collectible card packs, be they sports cards or Magic the Gathering cards.

In regards to splitting the game up between free to play players and paying players that does not seem feasible at all. If I decide to buy a single pack I don't think I should automatically have to go up against people who have purchased hundreds of them.

Lastly, for me, the mode will be about collecting cards, building a team and trying to set a strategy for the team I have to be as successful as it can be. I don't care what division I am in as long as my odds of winning perfect points and reward packs in that division are the same as for the person in the highest divisions. That way I can continue to build my team as I go.

Last edited by Maddox; 10-19-2018 at 12:34 PM.
Maddox is offline  
Old 10-19-2018, 09:50 PM   #14
nop990
Bat Boy
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 4
Hi again everyone, I appreciate everyone's replies and the discussion this thread has started. I will now reply to some of you directly.

Quote:
@JaytheGreat
This isn't as bad as say the EA Stars Wars series were you have to get so many parts of Darth Vader to use him, and you can either drop money or grind an incredible amount of hours trying to get enough xp to earn the loot boxes.
I completely agree here. I realize that my original post may have implied that I think this is as bad as those systems, and that couldn't be further from the truth.

Quote:
@Orcin
Yet this is your first forum post.
I don't quite understand what your point is. Is it a requirement of owning OOTP to post on the forums? I made an account here because I wanted to share my concern for this issue.When I want to interact with the community I prefer using the subreddit.

Quote:
The OOTPD model allows players to spend nothing and still get the extra content. Using your model, everyone has to pay an additional fee. Using their model, people choose what they want to pay. That seems more fair to me.
This is a fair point. My argument would be that in my system, everyone has the same chance as everyone else. There is no risk of the system being pay2win, which seems more fair to me.

Quote:
@mitchkenn
It's not out yet. it's in beta testing. How it rolls out and exactly what it will and will not be viewed as by the buying audience remains to be seen.
That is why it is important to express our concerns NOW rather than after it has finished development. Things are more malleable when they are still being developed.

Quote:
@Markus Heinsohn
Of course there are concerns about the issue of "loot boxes" and many games out there are simply designed to push users to spend as much money as possible. Our goal is to design Perfect Team in a way that you can have a lot of fun and be very competitive without spending a dime. Hence the opening post and its concerns does not apply to Perfect Team.

But, I know some people may think different, and feel PT is "pay to win". No matter what I say, I would not be able to convince them otherwise, so I won't waste time in even trying.

Will you be able to spend money in PT? Yes. Do you have to? No. Will you be able to field a competitive team without spending money? Yes. That's all what's relevant, from my point of view
Thank you for responding, Markus. I have a great deal of respect for you and the rest of the team, and I do want to make it clear that I trust your vision for the franchise. That is why I feel comfortable expressing my concerns on this forum. You are right that some people will never change their mind, but I am someone that likes to keep an open mind about most things.

My problem with the card packs is not just the potential for pay2win; my main concern is how similar these systems are to gambling. A previous poster expressed the age difference between people that play OOTP vs people that play Battlefront and other games with loot boxes. I don't believe that age is relevant. There are people that are just psychologically wired to gamble. It's an addiction. While they do have some responsibility to avoid this, many of them use video games as an escape. You may not consider this system to be gambling in legal terms, but it invokes the same psychological response. Whether or not your implementation of card packs is an intentional attempt to prey on these people, it is my sincere opinion that the nature of a system like this is unethical and predatory.

Last edited by nop990; 10-19-2018 at 09:51 PM.
nop990 is offline  
Old 10-20-2018, 03:34 AM   #15
Markus Heinsohn
Developer OOTP
 
Markus Heinsohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 24,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by nop990 View Post
My problem with the card packs is not just the potential for pay2win; my main concern is how similar these systems are to gambling. A previous poster expressed the age difference between people that play OOTP vs people that play Battlefront and other games with loot boxes. I don't believe that age is relevant. There are people that are just psychologically wired to gamble. It's an addiction. While they do have some responsibility to avoid this, many of them use video games as an escape. You may not consider this system to be gambling in legal terms, but it invokes the same psychological response. Whether or not your implementation of card packs is an intentional attempt to prey on these people, it is my sincere opinion that the nature of a system like this is unethical and predatory.
You are entitled to your opinion. Is gambling an addiction for some? Yes, certainly. I do not share your opinion of the rest of the points you bring up, but I won't discuss this here as the topic is vastly complicated and, as I stated earlier, no matter what I say, nothing will change your opinion.

Last edited by Markus Heinsohn; 10-20-2018 at 03:36 AM.
Markus Heinsohn is offline  
Old 10-20-2018, 06:46 PM   #16
el_gringo
Minors (Triple A)
 
el_gringo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markus Heinsohn View Post
Well, it does feel right to me to be honest. Of course, there will be whales, people who spend a lot of money. These will probably end up in the top level (Major Leagues) quicker than others, but the question will be, how many of them will there be? We will have several Major Leagues, and I seriously doubt that there will be so many whales that they fill those league completely. My guess is that the number will be about 10-15% of the Major League teams being whales, and since the difference between a team packed with all diamond cards and a team made of golds and a few diamonds (which will be doable if you have a bit of luck, invest your PP wisely and do a good job managing your team) is not that big (good player cards are pretty close to each other in terms of basic ratings), I am confident that the quote "you can have a lot of fun and be very competitive without spending a dime" will prove to be accurate.
Careful not to sell yourself short, I have a hunch you could be on the cautious side of thinking about just how popular this mode might be, and how much money people will be happy to spend You all have done a very good job with it on all levels, truly, both in its own right and compared with competing products. I think it's possible nearly every ML-level team (yes, in several different ML-level leagues) will be pretty serious whales by OOTP 20 or 21, but that's just my read on the product.

I think, regardless, the cascading and ever-expanding league structure will keep very nearly everyone happy. I also very much appreciate how much transparency has gone into contextualizing and clarifying the more subjective marketing phrases used. Even if we disagree about word choice, we're all clear and on the same page about what the model is, what the statistics are, etc. Informed customers are happy customers!
el_gringo is offline  
Old 10-20-2018, 09:31 PM   #17
Airdrop01
All Star Starter
 
Airdrop01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lenexa, KS / Wilson, WY
Posts: 1,354
Quote:
Originally Posted by RchW View Post
I completely agree. I'm not likely to use Perfect Team and even if I do less likely to pay. Having said that I know that my kids generation pays to play and it is a free choice. OOTPD are a special company in my opinion. They have consistently given me value for money and I 100% support any endeavour they undertake to increase sales dollars. That income will be used to improve several product offerings especially the Football game which has me very exited.

I have worked almost 30 years in a business that involves long term relationships and trust. I feel about OOTPD the way I hope my many long time customers feel about me.
I was the same until the Draft Kings dealings and the almost bragging by the developers about the ludic loop aspects of Perfect Team.

Sadly, this version of 19 is probably my last and I’ve had literally every one.
__________________
Airdrop01 is offline  
Old 10-21-2018, 05:48 AM   #18
Westheim
Hall Of Famer
 
Westheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 11,806
Two points; there is a big (huge actually) difference between Perfect Team and Draft Kings and consorts as I see it. It does not appear to me that you can ever sell all cards you have for PP and cash out. Thus, you can never win in a financial sense. Every dime you ever invest into the game is always going to be lost in terms of money. I thus can not see where the game constitutes gambling or anything like that.

Yes there are people that don't know where their limits. But it is the same with alcohol, some people don't know when to stop. Does that stop anybody "normal" from buying from Coors and Budweiser?

If you don't have the ability to contain yourself as much that you have to spend a thousand bucks just to get all the Yankee Historical All-Stars in an online version of a computer game that will bring out a new version every year, and you will have to repeat this feat every year for another thousand bucks, I don't think it is the game developers' fault. Get help, damnit.

Secondly, on a more personal level, never having been able to collect baseball cards because there simply are none over here (there are soccer player cards, and probably more, but that is just not the same...), I remain very interested in this feature, I bought 19 yesterday at discount, and I might drop the odd buck into new packs from time to time in desperate attempts to get the card-based Raccoons out of Rookie League, which will never ever work.
__________________
Portland Raccoons, 83 years of excell-.... of baseball: Furballs here!
1983 * 1989 * 1991 * 1992 * 1993 * 1995 * 1996 * 2010 * 2017 * 2018 * 2019 * 2026 * 2028 * 2035 * 2037 * 2044 * 2045 * 2046 * 2047 * 2048 * 2051 * 2054 * 2055
1 OSANAI : 2 POWELL : 7 NOMURA | RAMOS : 8 REECE : 10 BROWN : 15 HALL : 27 FERNANDEZ : 28 CASAS : 31 CARMONA : 32 WEST : 39 TONER : 46 SAITO

Resident Mets Cynic - The Mets from 1962 onwards, here.
Westheim is offline  
Old 10-21-2018, 11:57 AM   #19
sansterre
Minors (Triple A)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 248
Blog Entries: 2
I confess that when I heard about the ptp it was a bit of a turnoff. My major involvement with ptp was in Hearthstone, where getting into it you're pretty much told, "this game is technically free, but understand that playing free basically means that you need to become fantastic at this game to even have a prayer at the top ranks, and get ready to get stomped a lot while you slowly build up your card collection." Knowing that I wasn't willing to pay anything, it definitely killed a lot of my enthusiasm.

Now this is a different game. Developed by a different company. And it's not fair to hold one company's practice against another.

I'm not excited about Perfect Team so that I can win it all. It's baseball, it's heavily random anyways. I love the challenge of making the best possible team from my component pieces. The idea that I'm going to be doing that with a massive collection of historical and modern players, all of whom are theoretically starters . . . it's a challenge that I can't resist and am having a difficult time waiting for.

I do worry about the ptp mechanic. I do worry that sufficient exposure to the income stream that will be a corrupting influence. That once the company sees how much money is at stake, and what could be accomplished with it, they will slowly become biased in favor of the 'whales' and against the interests of everyone else. This is possible.

I don't believe that it will happen. Markus has built this baby up from nothing. Over many, many years. And I'd guess that if he wanted to walk away from the hassle of growing the best baseball simulation ever for the rest of us, he could have done so with a pretty decent chunk of change instead of turning around and reinvesting it (as he has clearly done at least in part) on the development and improvement of the game. I mean, come on, how many Head Devs spend this much time on their forums, openly allowing people to call them out, interacting with them, accepting if not embracing the criticism?

Ultimately, I have faith in Markus. I think that he genuinely believes that this ptp mechanic will not harm the experience of the normal players. I mean, maybe the rest of us will be the Padres against the whales' Yankees. That's fine; I love a good challenge. But if it gets worse than that? I expect that Markus has already anticipated this and has contingency plans in place if need be. He and the team have put a ton of thought and time into this project and I'm sure they have anticipated possible downsides. I'm not saying this will transition easily; this is a completely new thing. It'll be a bumpy ride. But I trust our driver. This game we play and all too often take for granted is the product of nineteen iterations. Those initial customers were wise to bet that Markus would stick with it and build something great. I hope to do the same.

tl;dr All of the above concerns are completely fair. But I think there's more than enough evidence to suggest that Markus and co. deserve the benefit of the doubt.

Cheers!
sansterre is offline  
Old 10-21-2018, 12:38 PM   #20
Markus Heinsohn
Developer OOTP
 
Markus Heinsohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 24,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by sansterre View Post
I confess that when I heard about the ptp it was a bit of a turnoff. My major involvement with ptp was in Hearthstone, where getting into it you're pretty much told, "this game is technically free, but understand that playing free basically means that you need to become fantastic at this game to even have a prayer at the top ranks, and get ready to get stomped a lot while you slowly build up your card collection." Knowing that I wasn't willing to pay anything, it definitely killed a lot of my enthusiasm.

Now this is a different game. Developed by a different company. And it's not fair to hold one company's practice against another.

I'm not excited about Perfect Team so that I can win it all. It's baseball, it's heavily random anyways. I love the challenge of making the best possible team from my component pieces. The idea that I'm going to be doing that with a massive collection of historical and modern players, all of whom are theoretically starters . . . it's a challenge that I can't resist and am having a difficult time waiting for.

I do worry about the ptp mechanic. I do worry that sufficient exposure to the income stream that will be a corrupting influence. That once the company sees how much money is at stake, and what could be accomplished with it, they will slowly become biased in favor of the 'whales' and against the interests of everyone else. This is possible.

I don't believe that it will happen. Markus has built this baby up from nothing. Over many, many years. And I'd guess that if he wanted to walk away from the hassle of growing the best baseball simulation ever for the rest of us, he could have done so with a pretty decent chunk of change instead of turning around and reinvesting it (as he has clearly done at least in part) on the development and improvement of the game. I mean, come on, how many Head Devs spend this much time on their forums, openly allowing people to call them out, interacting with them, accepting if not embracing the criticism?

Ultimately, I have faith in Markus. I think that he genuinely believes that this ptp mechanic will not harm the experience of the normal players. I mean, maybe the rest of us will be the Padres against the whales' Yankees. That's fine; I love a good challenge. But if it gets worse than that? I expect that Markus has already anticipated this and has contingency plans in place if need be. He and the team have put a ton of thought and time into this project and I'm sure they have anticipated possible downsides. I'm not saying this will transition easily; this is a completely new thing. It'll be a bumpy ride. But I trust our driver. This game we play and all too often take for granted is the product of nineteen iterations. Those initial customers were wise to bet that Markus would stick with it and build something great. I hope to do the same.

tl;dr All of the above concerns are completely fair. But I think there's more than enough evidence to suggest that Markus and co. deserve the benefit of the doubt.

Cheers!
Thank you for the kind words

Perfect Team will be a journey. I want this mode to be as fun as possible for as many users as possible, while still generating extra revenue for the company which we then can invest back into the different game modes (core game + Perfect Team). Along the way we will probably have to make adjustments from version to version, but I think the base concept of PT is very sound and will be competitive right out of the gate. We'll see where it goes from there, and we will learn our lessons along the way and apply the conclusions during development of future versions.
Markus Heinsohn is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 AM.

 

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com.

Officially Licensed Product – MLB Players, Inc.

Out of the Park Baseball is a registered trademark of Out of the Park Developments GmbH & Co. KG

Google Play is a trademark of Google Inc.

Apple, iPhone, iPod touch and iPad are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.

COPYRIGHT © 2023 OUT OF THE PARK DEVELOPMENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2020 Out of the Park Developments