MetzKid's MLB Logo set Done!! - Page 2

potatoman · 05-10-2003, 07:06 PM

if theres no interest, we won't do the pitching set

potatoman · 05-10-2003, 11:13 PM

bump

potatoman · 05-11-2003, 12:06 PM

http://baseballsimcentral.com/dloads...led/2920.shtml .... its up on BSC

Jacesen · 05-11-2003, 12:51 PM

very well done....

Can't speak for anyone else... but i would love to see a pitchers set

J

potatoman · 05-11-2003, 01:10 PM

thanks if others are interested then we will make a pitchers set

couriers · 05-11-2003, 02:46 PM

Very nice work. The quality speaks for itself. You better not skip on the pitchers set.

Kelric · 05-11-2003, 06:57 PM

I vote for a pitcher's set as well.

I love this set, my only comment would be can you include a Who's Who in the ReadMe?

potatoman · 05-12-2003, 12:10 AM

shub can u rename the file to V1? not 1.1

Daballman22 · 05-12-2003, 06:54 AM

I'm liking what i see so far, can't wait to see the rest.

MizzouRah · 05-13-2003, 11:57 AM

These show up nicely in the game!

Can you do a set without the players, just the backgrounds?

Another great set by Cuss & Co.

Todd

couriers · 05-13-2003, 05:27 PM

A set like these without the players would be a great thing. One suggestion though, make the complete logo visible at least once and then include portions of it to fill in the blanks.

Cuss16 · 05-13-2003, 05:28 PM

good suggestion, will think it over. Thanx!

potatoman · 05-14-2003, 07:21 AM

yeah, sounds like a good suggestion

MizzouRah · 05-14-2003, 09:05 AM

Just wanted to say again, these are some really nice logos and show up really nice in the game.

I was happy with ones I made, but now I'm using yours... thanks!

Todd

couriers · 06-03-2003, 10:49 PM

Cuss,

I loaded these logos tonight and noticed that there were true black transperancy issues with each one. You may want to look into making the easy corrections and reposting a completed set. Just a thought.

Cuss16 · 06-03-2003, 11:02 PM

really!? did you see them inside the game, because we tested them out on two seperate games and corrected every single true black logos. On mine they look fine. I dont know what's the problem.

potatoman · 06-03-2003, 11:28 PM

yeah on mine it looked perfect

couriers · 06-03-2003, 11:41 PM

No offense but you might want to up the ante a bit on your definition of perfect. These are really nice logos but I would venture to guess that everybody’s computer handles true black the same. I could be wrong on this because I am not half of the artist that either of you two are. My intent was to simply bring this issue to your attention and nothing more. I would love to use these logos and would love even more for them to be perfect. I of course can fix the problems myself in the matter of minutes but I was thinking that others might like them without the splotches.

Here are just 4 examples of what I am seeing in the game. The best way to check logos is to start a new career and use the “sign coaches and scouts” option during the preseason so that you see them at their intended size of 150x150 and not just a resized logo as are common on the other screens.

Arizona Diamondbacks

Chicago White Sox

Cincinnati Reds

San Diego Padres

These were taken from screen shots from within the game and were not altered in any way. All of the logos have issues like this but some are more drastic than others.

Cuss16 · 06-04-2003, 12:20 AM

oh sorry about that, but i could have sworn that nothing like that appeared on my set when we first tested. I'll fix that as soon i can find some free time. Sorry about that.

couriers · 06-04-2003, 12:29 AM

What are you apologizing for? It's not a big problem and it's easy to fix. I personally have found that adjusting the color level output to a minimum of 5 and no less works the best. Anything lower than that tends to cause problems and anything higher than that fades the other colors too much. Thanks for looking into it.

BTW, it looks like our new online league will be using these logos. It really is a nice set and a job well done by both of you. I'm still looking forward to the other ideas that you have throw out to us as teasers. Hopefully everything will work out great.

05-10-2003, 07:06 PM	#21
potatoman Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: New Jersey Posts: 2,410 Infractions: 0/1 (1)	if theres no interest, we won't do the pitching set __________________ GFBL - Storm - 5 seasons - 500 - 310 New Jersey Nighthawks (1227-717) Last 5 seasons 2011: 118-44 2012: 100-62 2013: 111-51 2014: 106-56 2015: 108-54 OTBA Champions: 2008, 2010,2011

05-10-2003, 11:13 PM	#22
potatoman Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: New Jersey Posts: 2,410 Infractions: 0/1 (1)	bump __________________ GFBL - Storm - 5 seasons - 500 - 310 New Jersey Nighthawks (1227-717) Last 5 seasons 2011: 118-44 2012: 100-62 2013: 111-51 2014: 106-56 2015: 108-54 OTBA Champions: 2008, 2010,2011

05-11-2003, 12:06 PM	#23
potatoman Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: New Jersey Posts: 2,410 Infractions: 0/1 (1)	http://baseballsimcentral.com/dloads...led/2920.shtml .... its up on BSC __________________ GFBL - Storm - 5 seasons - 500 - 310 New Jersey Nighthawks (1227-717) Last 5 seasons 2011: 118-44 2012: 100-62 2013: 111-51 2014: 106-56 2015: 108-54 OTBA Champions: 2008, 2010,2011

05-11-2003, 01:10 PM	#25
potatoman Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: New Jersey Posts: 2,410 Infractions: 0/1 (1)	thanks if others are interested then we will make a pitchers set __________________ GFBL - Storm - 5 seasons - 500 - 310 New Jersey Nighthawks (1227-717) Last 5 seasons 2011: 118-44 2012: 100-62 2013: 111-51 2014: 106-56 2015: 108-54 OTBA Champions: 2008, 2010,2011

05-12-2003, 12:10 AM	#28
potatoman Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: New Jersey Posts: 2,410 Infractions: 0/1 (1)	shub can u rename the file to V1? not 1.1 __________________ GFBL - Storm - 5 seasons - 500 - 310 New Jersey Nighthawks (1227-717) Last 5 seasons 2011: 118-44 2012: 100-62 2013: 111-51 2014: 106-56 2015: 108-54 OTBA Champions: 2008, 2010,2011

05-11-2003, 12:51 PM	#24
Jacesen Minors (Single A) Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Edmonton Posts: 82	very well done.... Can't speak for anyone else... but i would love to see a pitchers set J

05-11-2003, 02:46 PM	#26
couriers All Star Reserve Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Fort Lauderdale Fla Posts: 932	Very nice work. The quality speaks for itself. You better not skip on the pitchers set.

05-11-2003, 06:57 PM	#27
Kelric Hall Of Famer Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Greater Boston Area Posts: 3,992	I vote for a pitcher's set as well. I love this set, my only comment would be can you include a Who's Who in the ReadMe?

05-12-2003, 06:54 AM	#29
Daballman22 Minors (Rookie Ball) Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 23	I'm liking what i see so far, can't wait to see the rest. __________________ "Today I consider myself the luckiest man, on the face of the Earth."--Lou Gehrig

05-13-2003, 11:57 AM	#30
MizzouRah Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Troy, Mo Posts: 6,251	These show up nicely in the game! Can you do a set without the players, just the backgrounds? Another great set by Cuss & Co. Todd

05-13-2003, 05:27 PM	#31
couriers All Star Reserve Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Fort Lauderdale Fla Posts: 932	A set like these without the players would be a great thing. One suggestion though, make the complete logo visible at least once and then include portions of it to fill in the blanks.

05-13-2003, 05:28 PM	#32
Cuss16 Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: BC, CANADA Posts: 2,994	good suggestion, will think it over. Thanx! __________________

05-14-2003, 07:21 AM	#33
potatoman Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: New Jersey Posts: 2,410 Infractions: 0/1 (1)	yeah, sounds like a good suggestion __________________ GFBL - Storm - 5 seasons - 500 - 310 New Jersey Nighthawks (1227-717) Last 5 seasons 2011: 118-44 2012: 100-62 2013: 111-51 2014: 106-56 2015: 108-54 OTBA Champions: 2008, 2010,2011

05-14-2003, 09:05 AM	#34
MizzouRah Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Troy, Mo Posts: 6,251	Just wanted to say again, these are some really nice logos and show up really nice in the game. I was happy with ones I made, but now I'm using yours... thanks! Todd

06-03-2003, 10:49 PM	#35
couriers All Star Reserve Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Fort Lauderdale Fla Posts: 932	Cuss, I loaded these logos tonight and noticed that there were true black transperancy issues with each one. You may want to look into making the easy corrections and reposting a completed set. Just a thought.

06-03-2003, 11:02 PM	#36
Cuss16 Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: BC, CANADA Posts: 2,994	really!? did you see them inside the game, because we tested them out on two seperate games and corrected every single true black logos. On mine they look fine. I dont know what's the problem. __________________

06-03-2003, 11:28 PM	#37
potatoman Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: New Jersey Posts: 2,410 Infractions: 0/1 (1)	yeah on mine it looked perfect __________________ GFBL - Storm - 5 seasons - 500 - 310 New Jersey Nighthawks (1227-717) Last 5 seasons 2011: 118-44 2012: 100-62 2013: 111-51 2014: 106-56 2015: 108-54 OTBA Champions: 2008, 2010,2011

06-03-2003, 11:41 PM	#38
couriers All Star Reserve Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Fort Lauderdale Fla Posts: 932	No offense but you might want to up the ante a bit on your definition of perfect. These are really nice logos but I would venture to guess that everybody’s computer handles true black the same. I could be wrong on this because I am not half of the artist that either of you two are. My intent was to simply bring this issue to your attention and nothing more. I would love to use these logos and would love even more for them to be perfect. I of course can fix the problems myself in the matter of minutes but I was thinking that others might like them without the splotches. Here are just 4 examples of what I am seeing in the game. The best way to check logos is to start a new career and use the “sign coaches and scouts” option during the preseason so that you see them at their intended size of 150x150 and not just a resized logo as are common on the other screens. Arizona Diamondbacks Chicago White Sox Cincinnati Reds San Diego Padres These were taken from screen shots from within the game and were not altered in any way. All of the logos have issues like this but some are more drastic than others.

06-04-2003, 12:20 AM	#39
Cuss16 Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: BC, CANADA Posts: 2,994	oh sorry about that, but i could have sworn that nothing like that appeared on my set when we first tested. I'll fix that as soon i can find some free time. Sorry about that. __________________

06-04-2003, 12:29 AM	#40
couriers All Star Reserve Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Fort Lauderdale Fla Posts: 932	What are you apologizing for? It's not a big problem and it's easy to fix. I personally have found that adjusting the color level output to a minimum of 5 and no less works the best. Anything lower than that tends to cause problems and anything higher than that fades the other colors too much. Thanks for looking into it. BTW, it looks like our new online league will be using these logos. It really is a nice set and a job well done by both of you. I'm still looking forward to the other ideas that you have throw out to us as teasers. Hopefully everything will work out great.