|
||||
|
|
OOTP 18 - General Discussions Everything about the 2017 version of Out of the Park Baseball - officially licensed by MLB.com and the MLBPA. |
View Poll Results: 3-D vs 2-D | |||
3-D | 52 | 73.24% | |
2-D | 19 | 26.76% | |
Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
04-18-2017, 04:59 PM | #1 |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SC USA
Posts: 864
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
3-D vs 2-D?
I keep going back and forth about which I like better. I've used 2-D forever but have been trying the 3-D. Sometimes the ball animation is quirky. I wish the logo banner could be put up at the top like 2-D.
So informal poll...which does everyone like better and are using? |
04-18-2017, 05:51 PM | #2 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 10,456
|
3D and here is why, so that I don't have to repeat myself:
http://www.ootpdevelopments.com/boar...d.php?t=276011
__________________
- Bru |
04-18-2017, 06:22 PM | #3 |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,245
|
2D broadcast view. It's more customizable with widgets like out of town scores, players on the bench, etc. It has the more verbose PBP which I've always enjoyed. I've been playing OOTP since 8 and as nice as 3D is, it never did anything for me. Plus I have multiple megabytes of stadium images that I've collected over the years and would rather use.
Markus has a dream of a stadium builder in the game at some future point. When that happens I'll switch to 3D |
04-18-2017, 08:35 PM | #4 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,521
|
2D all the way for me. Whole bunch of reasons. But here are the top 3...
#1) Prefer full detail play by play. #2) My customized 2D ballparks are more colorful, team specific and a dream to play in. #3) Still fun to use my imagination at little. Don't get me wrong, I may jump to 3D in the future as it improves. I know this'll take time, but still needs better crowd animations and besides the pbp not syncing, the crowd cheer is simply still not up to par. The bat sounds seem to be on point but there are still times when the home team hits a home run (other plays, as well) and the there is no roar from the crowd. That kills it for me. So I still play with sound off. Confident it'll get better some day. |
04-19-2017, 06:08 AM | #5 |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 442
|
Can't imagine NOT playing in 3D anymore. I'm just glad there is an option to play either way.
|
04-19-2017, 07:53 AM | #6 |
Major Leagues
|
I love 3d (especially this version) but it still runs a bit hot on my Macbook Pro.. so I always revert to 2d - which has its advantages (pbp, better screen layout, doesn't run hot, simple). I will probably always give 3d a go here and there but I play 90% or more on 2d.
|
04-19-2017, 09:05 AM | #7 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 10,456
|
I agree with this, despite what I said above. I may get tired of 3D someday, or some bug may creep in, so I still want the option to go back to 2D broadcast and webcast.
__________________
- Bru |
04-19-2017, 09:18 AM | #8 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking for a place called Leehofooks
Posts: 8,880
|
I'll always be a 2D. That being said, I love the new stadium models. My only hope is as these stadiums continue to improve, the creators refrain from stretching the infield into that bizarre diamond shape. When home plate to second is twice as far in the image as second base to the centerfield wall, something is off. I still put short play by play instant as one of the best additions Markus ever added to OOTP. Before he added this, I was in favor of a results only feature, but I like short play by play much better.
|
04-19-2017, 09:27 AM | #9 |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 123
|
2D Broadcast
I'll switch to 3D when it syncs with the full play-by-play and is able to demonstrate non-routine plays (diving, jumping plays, etc). |
04-19-2017, 11:26 AM | #10 |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 576
|
3D Baby!
|
04-20-2017, 04:53 AM | #11 |
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 47
|
I was a hard core 2D player. I do not like 3D for the most part in any game (I mainly play OOTP or war games only), I even mentioned on this forum or another in regards to OOTP that I did not want or care about 3D and hoped resources were not "wasted" on 3D at the expense of any other feature...BUT...starting last version I thought I would check it out for a series and I got hooked. I love the 3D and it is even better in 18. Its the only way I play out games now.
|
04-20-2017, 11:41 AM | #12 |
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 228
|
I forgot how to play this game without 3D.
|
04-20-2017, 01:23 PM | #13 | |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SC USA
Posts: 864
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
Quote:
|
|
04-20-2017, 02:44 PM | #14 |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SC USA
Posts: 864
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
One thing is I wish the little men in 3-D had the colors of the teams....
|
04-20-2017, 06:50 PM | #15 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 9,798
|
Quote:
I have a 24" wide screen with 1900x1200 resolution. I use the wide view. In the settings under 3d & facegen, I set ball size to normal and player model scale to 1.2. If you have a larger monitor or better resolution, try increasing the scale a little more. Then in the game options, before starting the game, be sure you have selected yes for "detailed player pawns". Edit: Here's a section of my screen so you can see what it looks like. Notice the jersey logo on the Cardinals baserunner. Last edited by Orcin; 04-20-2017 at 07:14 PM. Reason: added screenshot |
|
04-20-2017, 08:08 PM | #16 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 7,167
|
the 3d is so poor that i cannot look past it. 3d games from 15-20 years ago looked as good or better.
luckily, it's not important to the actual game of ootp. it's great that it was added, even thgh i have no interest, but this type of asthetic stuff is valued so highly and the ai logic remains mostly unchanged about things that need to be improved for 5-10years or more. |
04-20-2017, 10:32 PM | #17 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 10,456
|
Quote:
http://www.ootpdevelopments.com/boar...d.php?t=277537 Back to broadcast or webcast. EDIT: Heh, it's funny how I had that feeling when I wrote the part of the post which I bolded in this quote. That's sometimes the way it goes with this game. It is so darned complicated that stuff goes wrong from version to version, even patch to patch. Stuff that was fixed before gets broke, gets fixed, gets broke again. That is why having CHOICES can be very important. Could I play games out in Wrigley, Sun Trust, and Globe Life with either blank crowds or skylines? Sure. It's no big deal. Yet, it would bother me every time I "visited" those stadiums (thank goodness none of them is my home stadium). I would be looking for it every time and my enjoyment would suffer. So for now, I choose to return to broadcast or webcast.
__________________
- Bru Last edited by Déjà Bru; 04-20-2017 at 11:07 PM. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|