|
||||
|
|
OOTP 14 - General Discussions Discuss the new 2013 version of Out of the Park Baseball here! |
|
Thread Tools |
02-21-2013, 07:20 PM | #2 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Up There
Posts: 15,414
|
How about earlier versions of the draft, which featured a regular and secondary round, January and June drafts? Or the draft-and-follow system which was in place from 1987 through 2006? Lots of thngs from the past which might make for some interesting new challenges from the general manager perspective...
|
02-21-2013, 09:03 PM | #3 |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,919
|
Or the ability to have multiple leagues share a common draft pool without being associated, so that you could have the same draftee with offers from different teams in different leagues.
You'd probably have to force the draft dates to be the same though. |
02-22-2013, 08:38 AM | #4 |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 146
|
I am all for OP idea as long as this top 100 list isn't an objective list like the BA top 100 prospects and top 20 prospects for each team. Although, if the list was made by BNN, wouldn't it just rank them by the top 100 rated players using the scouting rating? If so, it would be wildly inaccurate. You find 5 star BNN prospects in the 20th round or later.
|
02-22-2013, 09:26 AM | #5 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Up There
Posts: 15,414
|
Quote:
That need not be required. Though from a practical point of view, the dates may need to be similar in order for a player drafted in multiple leagues to have sufficient time to weigh the different offers. League rules would also play a role here (e.g. a league with a fixed signing date deadline versus one with no fixed deadline). |
|
02-22-2013, 09:52 AM | #6 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hucknall, Notts, UK
Posts: 4,902
|
Quote:
Anyway, I agree with the idea of having one universe-wide draft pool. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|