|
||||
|
|
OOTP 20 - General Discussions Everything about the newest version of Out of the Park Baseball - officially licensed by MLB.com and the MLBPA. |
|
Thread Tools |
12-18-2019, 12:41 PM | #61 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 9,825
|
This has nothing to do with "fairness". This is about cutting out boring moments of the game where literally nothing happens. Pinch hitters do not get 8 free swings from the box and do not need to warm up. To the extent that they do, they make use of the on deck circle. In actual baseball, a team can announce a pinch hitter and boom, he takes the field. This is flat out not the case with a relief pitcher.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
12-18-2019, 12:48 PM | #62 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 9,825
|
dola,A team would do this once and then MLB would pass a rule against it the next offseason (if they didn't already interpret an existing rule - for instance the delay of game rules - to catch this loophole in the first place). Like, this exact thing happened in the NFL in the late 1980s when the Bengals and Bills were running the no-huddle offense and the Seahawks used their nose tackle Joe Nash to fake injuries so they could get different personnel on the field. I don't see why this would be some kind of game-bending issue.
I do like the idea of dumping, say, half the TV breaks as we move into an era that isn't all about television anymore. I do think that baseball will be very, very slow to adopt this, as the US model is you show the game, then you have a 90 second break, then you show the game again. I agree that that's increasingly a less and less viable model (and frankly even in its heyday everyone at home used those 90 seconds as bathroom / food replenishment / looking up stats in the encyclopedia breaks) but, well, nobody ever accused baseball of not hanging onto traditions for traditions' sake...
__________________
Quote:
|
|
12-18-2019, 04:42 PM | #63 | ||
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Scarborough, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 798
|
Quote:
Quote:
Forcing 3 batters to a pitcher seems like a bad rule that is not guaranteed to speed up the game.
__________________
Jonny AFBL:Ontario Blue Pirates (2013-2055) 3177-3255(.494) Wild Card:8 Division Titles: 8 Pennants: 2020, 2049, 2051 2051 CHAMPS Former leagues: LOHO: Detroit Tigers ISL: San Diego Padres VSL: Pittsburgh Pirates NPBL: Ohio Raptors/Nova Scotia Fishermen Check you my YOUTUBE or TWITCH |
||
12-18-2019, 05:00 PM | #64 |
OOTP Developer
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 14,089
|
The #1 change they could do would be to actually enforce batters leaving the box between pitches. There's no reason they should need to undo and redo their glove, belt, cap, etc... every pitch. Even just shaving 2 second per pitch would be something like 8-10 minutes per game saved, maybe more. And 2 seconds is just to get back to what things were in the early 2000s, never mind back to the actual rulebook or to how things were back in the 90s or before.
|
12-18-2019, 07:55 PM | #65 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2016
Location: St Petersburg Florida USA
Posts: 5,323
|
Quote:
OK, so maybe his production wasn't a super deal for his salary anymore. Well, his leaving cost the Pirates 4000 in attendance per game. Enough to make money on McCutchen's salary even if he didn't play at all. And the guy would have cut the Pirates a break to stay in Pittsburgh. FFS, he named his kid Steel. Similar arguments could have been made for the Rays and Longoria except the Rays have played so many games with the public and governments they've built to an unrecoverable level of apathy. |
|
12-18-2019, 08:06 PM | #66 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,152
|
People who feel strongly either way are greatly overrating how much this rule even matters
|
12-19-2019, 02:58 AM | #67 | |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 580
|
Quote:
What can they do about that? That's as much team/hitter philosophy as anything else. There's no rule to dictate that hitters should only strive for the "three true outcomes". Do away with warm up pitches. Warm up in the bullpen...that's what it's for, right? And if the bullpen mound is different than the game mound...well make them the same. Last edited by KBLover; 12-19-2019 at 03:00 AM. |
|
12-19-2019, 11:10 AM | #68 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,291
|
Quote:
|
|
12-19-2019, 03:51 PM | #70 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Ban land in 3...2...
Posts: 2,943
|
Quote:
But it's the best way to win Quote:
|
||
12-19-2019, 05:29 PM | #71 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 9,825
|
Quote:
My main issue with doing this is that it puts a lot on the umpires, especially early in the season, and for all our talk about how ornery those guys are, they really *don't* like to make the guys they're adjudicating angry with them for little reason. That's a big part of why the 20 second delay of game rule is rarely if ever enforced (and when it is, it's usually enforced on the home team when, say, the big TV screen in the outfield starts counting everyone down) and I also think it's kind of behind how strike zones slowly shrink or expand over the course of both individual games as well as multiple seasons. From their standpoint, this represents a thing you have to be mean about with pretty much every single batter on every single play, and there has to be *some* amount of give and take on that for when a guy actually needs to knock a rock out of his cleats or just get his head together after a high and inside fastball. Some umpires, given the choice between pissing off 18 guys who they have to interact with on a daily basis and 2 or 3 guys who are probably stationed across the country (who do write their paychecks, sure, but umpires aren't just in this to please their bosses), are going to heavily err on the side of giving the hitter a break, perhaps to the extent of non-enforcement. IMO this is the sort of thing you probably need to introduce in the minors first and then, once the younger guys are all used to not taking their time, you bring it in after, say, 5 years or so.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
12-19-2019, 05:42 PM | #72 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 9,825
|
dola,
Quote:
I really don't feel *hugely* strong about this - my biggest issues with the game today are the time it takes and the dearth of balls put in play - but one of the benefits of requiring guys to pitch to 3 batters apiece is that, well, it's a nice, built-in way to have fewer relief breaks. Yes, it will mean the death of pure LOOGYs (not that they are *that* common anyway) and it will mean that pitchers with not-as-deep platoon splits will be more favored. *That* at least would if anything be a reversion to a way the game used to be played (and maybe in the offing will actually cause more pinch-hitting to happen; pinch hitting, especially for position players, is way down, almost necessarily so given that your average American League team with a 13 man pitching staff carries a backup catcher, a backup infielder, and a backup outfielder). I don't think strategy in and of itself is boring. Guys standing around for minutes at a time while a new pitcher is called in, on the other hand... Baseball may be the sport that relies the most on tradition but in the olden days, before all this "tradition" became calcified, they did change the rules. You used to be able to foul off pitch after pitch after pitch without any consequence. Guys like John McGraw actually made a living out of wearing out pitchers by doing this for sometimes 20 pitches in a row. Then in 1900 (I think that's the year) the National League implemented a rule that said if you did that, it would be counted as a strike unless you already had 2 strikes against you. Way, way back in the early days of the game you used to be able to intentionally muff a pop fly in order to get an easy double play with a runner on first base. The infield fly rule put the kibosh on that. If anything, requiring a pitcher to pitch to at least 3 batters unless they're injured or ejected is small - if anything, it can be thought of as an extension to the existing rule that says that a pitcher has to pitch to at least one guy.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
12-19-2019, 05:45 PM | #73 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The big smoke
Posts: 15,628
|
Nice previous post, only one quibble, I believe the human rain delay was Mike Hargrove.
__________________
Cheers RichW #stopthestupid “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit Last edited by RchW; 12-20-2019 at 12:14 AM. |
12-19-2019, 05:56 PM | #74 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 9,825
|
Quote:
Incidentally baseball-reference lists Rick Manning's nickname as "Archie". Now, bbref has taken the tack of including pretty much any nickname a player has been called by in, like, any major publication, which I for one am all for, but I suspect that people calling him "Archie" (after Peyton Manning's dad) was about as popular as people calling Jim Beattie "Zelmo" (after the ABA basketball player).
__________________
Quote:
|
||
12-19-2019, 08:41 PM | #75 |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,832
|
I thought Mike Hargrove was "the human rain delay". Rick Manning, I thought was "Arch".
If the rule is not gonna come up hardly, why even bother with it? If a manager wants to waste a pitcher on one batter, that's his choice. Why mess with the strategy of the game? Is banning shifts next? Maybe you have to tell the pitcher where you want the ball so as to hit even more homeruns. I mean let's get real silly about it. Guess the rules guys need to justify getting paid. Last edited by zappa1; 12-19-2019 at 08:53 PM. |
12-19-2019, 11:07 PM | #76 |
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 220
|
Rick Manning is only five years younger than Archie Manning, so if that was indeed a heavily used nickname it's pretty weird.
|
12-20-2019, 03:20 PM | #77 |
All Star Starter
|
Since you brought up Mike Hargrove... I took a deep dive into watching some 80s baseball games on youtube the other day. In one of those games, I saw Hargrove do his little ritual before stepping in. You know what? He really didn't take all that long! People used to howl that he would take forever back then, but relative today, the "human rain delay" seemed like a brief passing shower... Last edited by drksd4848; 12-20-2019 at 03:22 PM. |
12-20-2019, 04:31 PM | #78 |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,832
|
Another thing about Mike Hargrove I seem to remember. He really didn't get his nickname from his little ritual, as you say, I seem to remember that he got it specifically because he was a guy who walked constantly. He would take so many pitches and foul some off before finally getting a hit or taking a walk. In every year he played he had more walks than strikeouts. 12 years. That's what made his AB's so long. Joey Votto can't even match Hargrove in BB/K ratio. Unreal.
|
12-20-2019, 04:36 PM | #79 | |
All Star Starter
|
Quote:
Imagine that... A guy who actually worked the count. I suppose he didn't care about his "launch angle" |
|
12-20-2019, 06:38 PM | #80 | |
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 210
|
Quote:
Something like this would not work in modern baseball seeing the starting pitchers would be more taxed leading to more reliever usage thus rending the way current rosters are made up useless. The rest between innings is good for pitchers as they can regain some of the energy they lost during their previous inning as well as being able to calm down after a stressful half inning they just pitched. |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|