|
||||
|
07-25-2009, 05:42 PM | #1 |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 178
|
No hitters in Top Prospects
I find it odd that in my historical replay (starting in 1901 and currently entering 1911) that no hitter ever makes the top ten prospect list. In fact, they don't even make the top 20! Going into 1911, the highest rated hitter is Chicago's Vic Saier, and he's ranked #30. That puts 29 pitchers ahead of him.
I find it hard to believe that young hitters like Ty Cobb, Eddie Collins and Shoeless Joe Jackson have never made the scouting list.
__________________
J. Henry Waugh Universal Baseball Association |
07-25-2009, 05:48 PM | #2 |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 899
|
This is because it's the deadball era. The game doesn't really know "why" the era is the way it is, so the game rates pitchers higher than batters. This is reflected in the Top Prospects list.
|
07-26-2009, 06:08 PM | #3 |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 178
|
deadball duds
Yes, I can semi understand that, although why the game would put so much emphasis on the home run, which won't become the big part of the game it is for almost two decades.
Besides, my fictional league follows the historical line, yet hitters have made up 40-60% of the Top Prospects list.
__________________
J. Henry Waugh Universal Baseball Association |
07-27-2009, 04:25 AM | #4 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Ft Smith AR
Posts: 2,681
|
My 19th century online league is the same way, yet even more extreme: as of 30 April 1877, no hitters on the Top 100 prospects list.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|