NHL 25/26 Thread

[Cobra Mgr]

Sens were the better team tonight. They had to have 5 or 6 that hit the post.

[Bluenoser]

This is what I found for an official explanation.

Rule 83.1 of the NHL rulebook states in part: "A player controlling the puck who shall cross the line ahead of the puck shall not be considered 'off-side,' provided he had possession and control of the puck with his stick prior to both skates completely crossing the leading edge of the blue line."

Not sure what the difference is between possession and control.

Because the Hurricanes scored with the Senators on a delayed penalty, Carolina was still in line to receive the penalty after the disallowed goal.

That call was made with reference to Rule 38.7 of the NHL rulebook, which states in part: "If one or more penalties (minor or major) are assessed between the time of the missed infraction and the video review that disallows the apparent goal, the offending team(s) (and responsible Player(s)) will still be required to serve the penalty(ies) identified and assessed, and the time of the penalty(ies) will be recorded as the time at which the play should have been stopped for the missed infraction."

But this call wasn't just a regular penalty, as the referees determined that Jordan Martinook had a clear scoring chance taken away and awarded the Hurricanes forward a penalty shot.

[Cobra Mgr]

Originally Posted by Bluenoser

This is what I found for an official explanation.



Not sure what the difference is between possession and control.

Whole thing was confusing. If I'm caught w/a kilo of coke, am I going to argue in court, "Yeah I was in possession of it, but I wasn't controlling it."?

And the whole thing has "tuck rule" fiasco written all over it. If the police do an illegal search, no matter what evidence they find that proves my guilt they can't use it against me in court. "Fruit from the poisonous tree". So if they are "resetting" the game back to the time the offside took place, I don't know why the rule book would be written to allow the penalty to stand.

[Bluenoser]

The amount of penalties and rough stuff after the whistle in pretty much every game is incredible. I think most teams are mimicking what worked for the Panthers - Hit everything that moves.

I like a good solid body check as much as the next fan, but I'd much rather see the players on the ice than sitting 3 and 4 deep in the penalty box.

[Cobra Mgr]

Originally Posted by Bluenoser

The amount of penalties and rough stuff after the whistle in pretty much every game is incredible. I think most teams are mimicking what worked for the Panthers - Hit everything that moves.

I like a good solid body check as much as the next fan, but I'd much rather see the players on the ice than sitting 3 and 4 deep in the penalty box.

I was wondering if the physicality was my imagination or not. Canes game 1 was, IMO, the most physical I'd seen from Carolina I thought. And though they had fewer hits, it was still rougher than usual for them. I was actually impressed they were more physical in the OT than the Sens were.

But this is why I like the current format. Even though you'd prefer not to have matchups like Wild/Stars, Tampa/Montreal this early, the fact that these are division rivals going at each other makes it more personal.