OOTP 17 Complete Feature List - Page 8

JimboJones · 03-12-2016, 10:51 AM

Couldn't you just make a video of 3D using a fictional league?

Lukas Berger · 03-12-2016, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MizzouRah

There are screenshots of MLB logos and players.. so maybe that had to get approval too, I don't know the process I just find it odd.

Yes, all of those had to get approval

rjl518 · 03-12-2016, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimboJones

Couldn't you just make a video of 3D using a fictional league?

C'mon everyone, the game will be out in 6 days!
Yoda says "Patience!"

byzeil · 03-12-2016, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimboJones

Couldn't you just make a video of 3D using a fictional league?

My guess is that with the game being MLB and MLBPA licensed that anything put out has to be cleared even if it is to verify that all that is shown is fictional.

The Wolf · 03-12-2016, 05:16 PM

That horse is long dead.

ChromEagle · 03-12-2016, 07:10 PM

He's a ghost horse now....

froghair · 03-15-2016, 11:35 AM

Anyone know if there will be another road to release blog post?

Sabres2000 · 03-15-2016, 10:08 PM

Will ootp 17 have split squads during spring training

Painmantle · 03-16-2016, 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Markus Heinsohn

- Added the option to import historical minor leagues (including players) in historical games, including automatic realistic affiliation changes and minor league team relocations when the league progresses

Cheers,
Markus

So If I create a custom league and want to import "Historical teams" will I also have the ability to import their minors with them? From the way that's written my guess is no since the league would not be created with the Historical option, which makes me sad if it is the case

DustinthePOWERHOUSE · 03-16-2016, 12:56 PM

- Added leverage index to pitching stats, and splits by leverage for players
- Added leverage options to bullpen roles

I just re-read this and I just realized how great that was...that's a huge addition and something I had failed to notice the first time.

In terms of leverage splits and evaluation of "leverage" situations what stats are being used? Are they similar to the ones used on Fangraphs or are they from another site?

pstrickert · 03-16-2016, 01:32 PM

Just thought I'd relate my experience with the OOTP17 beta. (Hopefully, Markus won't mind.)

SPEED. I have an i7-4770 processor (about two years old). I don't know how long it took me last year to sim 1901-2014, but I'd usually run the sim overnight. Last night, I ran a 1901-2015 sim (with pics, facegen, and baseball cards disabled). It took just 82 minutes to complete. That's phenomenal!

ACCURACY: I checked the historical accuracy report. It has never been more accurate. Just 2.2% of the results were in the red (and only 1.6% since 1925 -- that is, post-Dead Ball Era). Take out the red results from the SB categories (which, while still excellent, are the hardest to get precise) and the percentage drops to less than 1% since 1925. Again, I've NEVER seen better results in OOTP.

Major kudos to Markus and Matt (not to mention Spritze, for all of his contributions) for making OOTP historicals second to none!

David Watts · 03-16-2016, 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pstrickert

Just thought I'd relate my experience with the OOTP17 beta. (Hopefully, Markus won't mind.)

SPEED. I have an i7-4770 processor (about two years old). I don't know how long it took me last year to sim 1901-2014, but I'd usually run the sim overnight. Last night, I ran a 1901-2015 sim (with pics, facegen, and baseball cards disabled). It took just 82 minutes to complete. That's phenomenal!

ACCURACY: I checked the historical accuracy report. It has never been more accurate. Just 2.2% of the results were in the red (and only 1.6% since 1925 -- that is, post-Dead Ball Era). Take out the red results from the SB categories (which, while still excellent, are the hardest to get precise) and the percentage drops to less than 1% since 1925. Again, I've NEVER seen better results in OOTP.

Major kudos to Markus and Matt (not to mention Spritze, for all of his contributions) for making OOTP historicals second to none!

Recalc or no recalc?

pstrickert · 03-16-2016, 01:39 PM

1-yr recalc with real lineups and transactions.

David Watts · 03-16-2016, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pstrickert

1-yr recalc with real lineups and transactions.

And you're saying most accurate of all time. Wow! News like this is hard to beat. Thanks.

DustinthePOWERHOUSE · 03-16-2016, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pstrickert

Just thought I'd relate my experience with the OOTP17 beta. (Hopefully, Markus won't mind.)

SPEED. I have an i7-4770 processor (about two years old). I don't know how long it took me last year to sim 1901-2014, but I'd usually run the sim overnight. Last night, I ran a 1901-2015 sim (with pics, facegen, and baseball cards disabled). It took just 82 minutes to complete. That's phenomenal!

ACCURACY: I checked the historical accuracy report. It has never been more accurate. Just 2.2% of the results were in the red (and only 1.6% since 1925 -- that is, post-Dead Ball Era). Take out the red results from the SB categories (which, while still excellent, are the hardest to get precise) and the percentage drops to less than 1% since 1925. Again, I've NEVER seen better results in OOTP.

Major kudos to Markus and Matt (not to mention Spritze, for all of his contributions) for making OOTP historicals second to none!

Wait, it took you 82 minutes to sim 113 years?

pstrickert · 03-16-2016, 01:50 PM

Yes, sir.

MikeS21 · 03-16-2016, 03:19 PM

lol! I'm not sure whether to applaud the blazing sim speeds over multi-decades of seasons, or scratch my head wondering why I never have simmed more than a month at any one time (even in off-seasons).

RANGER11JP · 03-17-2016, 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pstrickert

Yes, sir.

I am getting NO WHERE near that speed! OOTP16 was faster. I believe you neglected to turn your clocks ahead!!!

JP

NotMuchTime · 03-17-2016, 08:41 AM

It all sounds good... but I've barely played the last 3 or 4 releases and will wait this one out.

I never sim more than a week at a time.

I wonder how many cores it can use. Eight? (we can only hope)

prisonerno6 · 03-17-2016, 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pstrickert

Just thought I'd relate my experience with the OOTP17 beta. (Hopefully, Markus won't mind.)

SPEED. I have an i7-4770 processor (about two years old). I don't know how long it took me last year to sim 1901-2014, but I'd usually run the sim overnight. Last night, I ran a 1901-2015 sim (with pics, facegen, and baseball cards disabled). It took just 82 minutes to complete. That's phenomenal!

ACCURACY: I checked the historical accuracy report. It has never been more accurate. Just 2.2% of the results were in the red (and only 1.6% since 1925 -- that is, post-Dead Ball Era). Take out the red results from the SB categories (which, while still excellent, are the hardest to get precise) and the percentage drops to less than 1% since 1925. Again, I've NEVER seen better results in OOTP.

Major kudos to Markus and Matt (not to mention Spritze, for all of his contributions) for making OOTP historicals second to none!

03-12-2016, 07:10 PM	#146
ChromEagle Minors (Triple A) Join Date: Sep 2015 Posts: 260	He's a ghost horse now.... Last edited by ChromEagle; 03-12-2016 at 07:11 PM.

03-16-2016, 12:56 PM	#150
DustinthePOWERHOUSE All Star Reserve Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Boston Posts: 870	- Added leverage index to pitching stats, and splits by leverage for players - Added leverage options to bullpen roles I just re-read this and I just realized how great that was...that's a huge addition and something I had failed to notice the first time. In terms of leverage splits and evaluation of "leverage" situations what stats are being used? Are they similar to the ones used on Fangraphs or are they from another site? __________________ Shootin' at the walls of heartache, BANG BANG, I am THE WARRIOR! "It's hard to be humble when you're as great as I am"- Ali Wladimir Klitschko will DESTROY you.

03-12-2016, 10:51 AM	#141
JimboJones Minors (Triple A) Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 210	Couldn't you just make a video of 3D using a fictional league?

03-15-2016, 11:35 AM	#147
froghair Minors (Single A) Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: Rocky River, Ohio Posts: 67	Anyone know if there will be another road to release blog post?

03-15-2016, 10:08 PM	#148
Sabres2000 All Star Starter Join Date: Feb 2014 Posts: 1,022	Will ootp 17 have split squads during spring training

03-16-2016, 01:32 PM	#151
pstrickert Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 17,008	Just thought I'd relate my experience with the OOTP17 beta. (Hopefully, Markus won't mind.) SPEED. I have an i7-4770 processor (about two years old). I don't know how long it took me last year to sim 1901-2014, but I'd usually run the sim overnight. Last night, I ran a 1901-2015 sim (with pics, facegen, and baseball cards disabled). It took just 82 minutes to complete. That's phenomenal! ACCURACY: I checked the historical accuracy report. It has never been more accurate. Just 2.2% of the results were in the red (and only 1.6% since 1925 -- that is, post-Dead Ball Era). Take out the red results from the SB categories (which, while still excellent, are the hardest to get precise) and the percentage drops to less than 1% since 1925. Again, I've NEVER seen better results in OOTP. Major kudos to Markus and Matt (not to mention Spritze, for all of his contributions) for making OOTP historicals second to none!

03-16-2016, 01:39 PM	#153
pstrickert Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 17,008	1-yr recalc with real lineups and transactions.

03-16-2016, 01:50 PM	#156
pstrickert Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 17,008	Yes, sir.

03-16-2016, 03:19 PM	#157
MikeS21 Minors (Triple A) Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 279	lol! I'm not sure whether to applaud the blazing sim speeds over multi-decades of seasons, or scratch my head wondering why I never have simmed more than a month at any one time (even in off-seasons).

03-17-2016, 08:41 AM	#159
NotMuchTime Minors (Double A) Join Date: Mar 2016 Posts: 150	It all sounds good... but I've barely played the last 3 or 4 releases and will wait this one out. I never sim more than a week at a time. I wonder how many cores it can use. Eight? (we can only hope)