|
||||
|
![]() |
#101 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 6,163
|
Quote:
AVG: .259984 (1984 MLB: .260) OBP: .323282 (1984 MLB: .323) SLG: .381750 (1984 MLB: .385) OPS: .705032 (1984 MLB: .708) R/G: 4.30613 (1984 MLB: 4.26) ERA: 3.82065 (1984 MLB: 3.81) 2B/AB: .043306 (1984 MLB: .043) 3B/AB: .006887 (1984 MLB: .007) HR/AB: .021565 (1984 MLB: .023) BB/PA: .083629 (1984 MLB: .083) K/AB: .153984 (1984 MLB: .156) SB%: 66.95694% (1984 MLB: 66.74%) FLD%: .977774 (1984 MLB: .978) BABIP: .289129 (1984 MLB: .289) The offense has varied over these 62 seasons, but as you can see, the average of those 62 seasons is in absolute lockstep with where it was IRL. Awesome. Last edited by actionjackson; 02-08-2018 at 07:16 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#102 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,425
|
Thanks for the detailed response. I’ll set aside some time for testing this weekend.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#103 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 6,163
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#104 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,425
|
...and we have liftoff! I’ll let you know when I’ve finished simming 60 seasons.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#105 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,425
|
The eagle has landed!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#106 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,425
|
I'm not sure how much I can disclose outside beta. Let's just say I believe you'll be pleased with the results.
![]() NOTE: I used the new option to Lock League Total Stats. (BTW, I used 1984 as the inaugural year.) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#107 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking for a place called Leehofooks
Posts: 9,681
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#108 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,425
|
Outliers are hard to find. I'll give you some examples:
___________________________________________ .400+ BA: 1x (.413) ___________________________________________ 50+ HR: 2x (top: 52) ___________________________________________ 1.1000+ OPS: 9x (top: 1.1977) ___________________________________________ 150+ RBI: 2x (top: 151) ___________________________________________ 25+ Wins: 2x (top: 25) ___________________________________________ 20+ Losses: 32x (top: 24) <-- not sure why so many ____________________________________________ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#109 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,425
|
League BA and ERA remained consistent throughout the run. So, the Lock League Stats option is working.
![]() Last edited by pstrickert; 02-09-2018 at 01:06 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#110 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,339
|
A couple questions that you may be able to answer, you sort of answered one of the already.
1. There has been discussions that OOTP 18 runs “hotter” than 16. For example using recalc development off standard setting I would have 16 to 20 guys hitting .400 for the years 1901-1950 and in 18 I would have double that. Do you think OOTP will be more like 16? 2. Do you know if the issue with neutralized stats, OFs like Sam Crawford, Ty Cobb and many others showing up as 1st basemen, has that been resolved? Thank You, I hope I didn’t hijack this thread. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#111 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 6,163
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#112 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,425
|
Quote:
2. I don't play with neutralized stats. Sorry. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#113 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking for a place called Leehofooks
Posts: 9,681
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
Quote:
How about hits. Please tell me 200 is once again a good season and 230-250 is not a yearly thing. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#114 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,425
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#115 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking for a place called Leehofooks
Posts: 9,681
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#116 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 6,163
|
Quote:
I know you'll be busy with many other aspects of historical to test, but I wonder if you could try something for me when you get a chance. Could you see if you can start in say 1901 or even 1882 (the first year with sixteen teams in OOTP-fictional historical land) using 1984 as the base year for stats and strategies (if possible without messing up financials). Same settings for everything else. That will cinch the deal for me if things still look good. Maybe do a sixty year sim for comparison's sake. Just for comparison's sake with my OOTP16 62-year dynasty, I've had 2 .400 hitters so far, nine 50+ HR hitters, nine 1.100+ OPS guys, six 150+ RBI guys, six 25+ Win guys, and 63 20+ Loss guys. I think the reason there are so many 20+ Loss guys is because the AI is far more loyal to SP than any RL manager would be. I would say OOTP19 looks to be in-line with what I have seen in OOTP16, although I will be cautious and say it is early, but the returns so far appear to be promising. ![]() Last edited by actionjackson; 02-09-2018 at 04:54 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#117 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,425
|
action, my plan was to redo the test every couple of weeks until release. Just to see if Markus or Matt "jiggled" something somewhere and broke something somewhere else (if you know what I mean). I can run the other test, though, the one you want to start in 1901 or 1882. Perhaps tonight or tomorrow.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#118 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 6,163
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#119 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking for a place called Leehofooks
Posts: 9,681
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#120 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,425
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|