|
||||
|
![]() |
#61 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Retired defloration-maker living in Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 7,801
|
__________________
See ID Major League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of MLB Advanced Media, L.P. Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with the permission of Minor League Baseball. All rights reserved. |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pictured Above: Buck Barnett - Best Pitcher in OOTP History!
Posts: 957
|
Fellas, personally, I don't think this thread was that big a deal. A guy said he would like to have this feature back and some replied saying they felt other things were more important or that that idea gave them "less than zero interest." I never saw the original poster say he got his feelings hurt by the replies.
Really the only problems with the thread came when some tried to dictate how and what people should say when replying to someones suggestion. It's my opinion people should just post what they want and how they feel. We are all adults here. If you get your feelings hurt over something like a game forum, maybe you shouldn't be posting in it. Again, this is just my opinion. As someone mentioned earlier in this thread, as important as it seems to be for some for someone to be able to post their suggestion, it is equally important for people to be able to voice their "un-interest" in the idea so Markus can wage the overall interest of the community to the idea. Otherwise we'd really have some pretty outrageous ideas in the game, like switch pitchers. (I mean really? One guy can do it in real life so it should become a feature in the game? Really?) Now, was that so bad a response to the switch pitcher idea? I'm sure Crymaniac can handle it. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hucknall, Notts, UK
Posts: 4,903
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Last edited by Cryomaniac; 02-02-2011 at 01:44 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#64 |
Major Leagues
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 481
|
So you like to freeze things. What's so odd about that? There was a point in the '80s when my parents were dehydrating anything that came into the kitchen. We had so many jars of dehydrated fruits and vegetables that the cabinets looked like something out of an alchemist's lab. I started worrying about the cat.
__________________
Currently managing: The Bridgetown Gruffs History: Portland Purple Knights of the USBL: 1x NL Champs 1970-74 Berkeley Free Radicals of the BBL: 4x Division Title, 3x LCS, 2x Left Coast Cup Champions 2011 Portland River Dragons of the SPL: 1x Division Title 2011 Las Vegas Coyotes (MLB): half season before DH bored me to death. |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,510
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hucknall, Notts, UK
Posts: 4,903
|
Well, actually the username is ironic (I'm somewhat of a pryomaniac, or was as a teenager), but yes, that is what it means.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#67 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,640
|
I support adding this feature as long as the wife can go on the 60-day DL with a miscarriage.
Also, husbands should occasionally go on the 15-day DL due to a 'nagging' injury. ![]() For those offended by any of these jokes, tough luck. Try living in North Korea. |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto ON by way of Glasgow UK
Posts: 15,629
|
Quote:
__________________
Cheers RichW If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks. “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#69 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hucknall, Notts, UK
Posts: 4,903
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Yankee Stadium, back in 1998.
Posts: 8,645
|
Gosh, this thread is weird. If there were a wife and kids in my game, I'd want to give them a virtual hug.
"Don't worry, guys. These weird people cannot touch you! They'll go away soon." [hugs and kisses laptop screen] |
![]() |
![]() |
#71 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 16,842
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
"Try again. Fail again. Fail better." -- Samuel Beckett _____________________________________________ |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#72 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All alone
Posts: 12,612
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
Generally "be more civil" translates to "shut up."
__________________
__________________ Quote:
Five thousand thanks for a non-modder? I never thought I'd see the day. Thank you for your support. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#73 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,092
|
I wish this thread would go away
|
![]() |
![]() |
#74 |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,590
|
More civil means not a dick. If someone is unable to meet that, than yes it means shut up.
^^^^^ |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 2,325
|
Note: Even though I'm quoting The Wolf here, this post is directed to everyone.
I don't think it means that at all. This would imply that some people aren't capable of being civil, so their only other option is to not say anything. That sounds like, "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all." ![]() I personally don't see what's so hard about being polite and offering constructive criticism. Unlike some people, I value everyone's opinion, even if their opinion is counter to my own. It's not always WHAT people say that's the problem, but how they say it. What if everytime you made a suggestion, several people chimed in with "That's a stupid idea. I hope Markus doesn't waste his time on that"? It's generally more productive to take the time to fully comprehend an idea and discuss alternatives than to just dismisses it outright. That's one of the problems with our society today; We don't value creativity and ingenuity. We're too impatient to engage in any real brainstorming. Instead, we prefer to just shoot down ideas right out of the box. And all that does is stifle progress and innovation. I guess I've just seen so many forums on the internet turn into cesspools of name-calling and ugly rhetoric over the past several years. I long for the days when people could have - here's that word again - civil discussions without feeling the need to put people down just because they don't agree with them. I'm not saying that's where the OOTP forum is headed by any means. (Compared to some forums, this place is a freakin' love-in.) I just don't think having an extra little bit of forum decorum is such a bad thing. ![]() Anyway, I've spent too much time "defending" the original idea of this thread. As I've stated before, I don't personally have any interest in the old version of the "wife and kids" feature returning. This is more about people - especially newer members of the OOTP community - feeling comfortable sharing their ideas in general. However, since I have been composing literally hundreds of storylines for OOTP 12, I'm unfortunately already preparing for the rash of negative comments that are bound to be posted about this storyline or that storyline. (And yes, there are some that involve events that take place off the playing field, which means there may be some mention of... wives and/or children. ![]() ![]() (Then again, if storylines burden you with a little too much reality, keep in mind you always have the option of deleting certain storylines from the database, or disabling storylines altogether. ![]() And so, in the immortal words of Forrest Gump, "That's all I have to say about that."
__________________
"It may be nothing. But it usually is always something and more than something." - Cardinals GM John Mozeliak |
![]() |
![]() |
#76 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Here
Posts: 6,156
|
This could be a good idea. However, it needs to take a back seat to all the other changes that are coming in 12. Expecting the beta testers to make sure that relationships don't have an overbearing effect on stats is too much work.
When the base ai is all settled then maybe we should concentrate on this extreme immersion feature. Otherwise the game will end up being a bit like a role-playing one where the subtext becomes more important. Lots of players probably have children, divorces, marriages, etc but I can't imagine it has much of an effect on their stats. Finding these traits would probably even tax ronco and injury log who are adept at finding patterns. If the game gets families there should be no problem getting advanced playoffs into it as it's black and white in how it works and can be much easier tested. Somehow though this view probably won't wash much with Markus. Despite this if families do work and don't affect the gameplay just the demographics then it's something that could be lived with. Last edited by Tony M; 02-03-2011 at 08:00 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#77 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 2,325
|
Quote:
I agree that there's really no way to measure whether, or to what degree, a player's stats are affected by what's happening in his life away from the field. Therefore, I don't anticipate reflecting this in storylines, either. So the bottom line is, people shouldn't worry too much about this. If anything, I think this will be a "best of both worlds" addition to the game. In other words, it's a simple and realistic way of having players' wives, kids, girlfriends, mothers-in-law, dogs, tax accountants, or whoever, make an appearance without turning OOTP into a cheesy role-playing game or taking up precious coding/testing time. ![]() However, this does bring up an interesting point that I hadn't considered before. I'm guessing storylines in general wouldn't be very welcome with historical simulators. So that's probably something those of us working on this feature should take a closer look at. Perhaps when starting a new historical league, storylines should be disabled by default, or maybe there should be an alternate database that doesn't contain any results - just stories. Or maybe not? ![]() Anyway, maybe this could be a good segue into a more positive and productive discussion on incorporating storylines into OOTP without negatively impacting gameplay. Thoughts, anyone?
__________________
"It may be nothing. But it usually is always something and more than something." - Cardinals GM John Mozeliak |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#78 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hucknall, Notts, UK
Posts: 4,903
|
On the subject of storylines, will a list of valid tokens and stuff be posted sometime just before or after release to allow for modding of the storyline database?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#79 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,092
|
I love the idea of story lines as long as they are related to baseball. I don't mind off the field stuff that are related to players' within the game, but please, no cheezy roleplaying wife and kids stuff. I could never see FM implementing anything like this.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#80 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 2,325
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
"It may be nothing. But it usually is always something and more than something." - Cardinals GM John Mozeliak |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|