What would you like to see?

[GForce]

Originally Posted by Long_Long_Name

I have no problem with someone not wanting that feature in. At all. It's fine. However, rejoicing about it, when it would make tons of people happy, is really disrespectful, in my opinion, and that's why I asked MD why he rejoiced about it.

I believe you answered your own question here, sir.

GH

[Long_Long_Name]

Originally Posted by GForce

I believe you answered your own question here, sir.

GH

I doubt that MD would answer that he is a disrespectul person - actually, when I brought up that it was the only reason I can think of he'd act like that, he... invoked the board rules on me and blocked me. So, in a way, I guess he did show that it was because he was disrespectful, but I was looking for a more insightful one, I suppose.

[<o>]

Originally Posted by Long_Long_Name

I was looking for a more insightful one, I suppose.

Ha, keep looking.

[Deft]

Originally Posted by battists

Just to comment on this, in case you missed it in one of the other threads Deft, but both Marc and Markus have posted in other threads that OOTPBM uses not one line of SI code. So, I'm not sure your first statement will hold true, since in fact no piggybacking is occurring.

Just thought I'd let you know if you hadn't heard!

Missed that, thanks!