Home | Webstore
Latest News: OOTP 27 Buy Now - FHM 12 Available - OOTP Go! 27 Available

Out of the Park Baseball 27 Buy Now!

  

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Out of the Park Developments > Talk Sports

Talk Sports Discuss everything that is sports-related, like MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA, MLS, NASCAR, NCAA sports and teams, trades, coaches, bad calls etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-22-2005, 08:19 AM   #41
Melo
All Star Starter
 
Melo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Where the baned reside
Posts: 1,428
Lowell was supposed to start working with his old hitting coach, Larry Denbo. I think Lowell's problem can be corrected. He wasn't getting his hands far enough back before he started his swing and was keeping his front knee bent, which was robbing him of power (credit to Keith Hernandez). If Lowell corrects those issues he can be close to what he was before.
Melo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 08:28 AM   #42
jaxmagicman
Hall Of Famer
 
jaxmagicman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Retired defloration-maker living in Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 7,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkhorse
It's what happens when a team gets fixated on a particular goal, in this case filling the SS position, and the myopia results in an inferior deal. Jon Daniels could have done the same and wildly overcompensated the Marlins to fill a perceived pitching need. I'm liking this kid more every day.
Which is confusing to me because the Marlins already have Luna to play SS. He doesn't hit, but neither did Gonzalez. I guess if Sanchez can give us Gonzalez type offense and decent defense they will be satisfied. I think this is a deal that could work out for both teams.
__________________
See ID


Major League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of MLB Advanced Media, L.P. Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with the permission of Minor League Baseball. All rights reserved.
jaxmagicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 08:45 AM   #43
andjbock
Hall Of Famer
 
andjbock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somerville, MA, USA Bats: Right Throws: Left
Posts: 3,640
I put never and meant name

Has Mike Lowell's name ever been tossed around with steroids?

Last edited by andjbock; 11-22-2005 at 03:09 PM.
andjbock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 08:55 AM   #44
Sublimity
Hall Of Famer
 
Sublimity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: This thread.
Posts: 3,199
Quote:
Originally Posted by andjbock
Has Mike Lowell's never ever been tossed around with steroids?
I've always personally considered the possibility, but I haven't heard it come up in the South Florida press or anywhere else. I would've remembered if I had heard it.
__________________
mrs ria: I hereby dub Sublimity the Glorious Upholder of the 5B3.

Current leading vote-getter in the Worst Poster in OT History poll.
Sublimity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 08:58 AM   #45
Joshv02
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: , "
Posts: 3,082
I thought he had to take steriods for his cancer treatment, but was not allowed to get a waiver from the Commish's office last year?
__________________
Brookline Maccabees. RIP
Joshv02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 08:58 AM   #46
plus1handicap
Minors (Double A)
 
plus1handicap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Concord, NH
Posts: 139
I was under the impression that Theo also was willing to take on Lowell and that he seemed pretty confident that Lowell would rebound with line drives on the Monster - pretty much making him a doubles machine until the power came back.

Still - Lowell (with or without power) is a gold glove 3B and depending on the money the Marlins throw into the deal could prove to be a steal next year. At least I am hoping so. Read this morning that Youks is now in line to start at 1B.

Also heard that the Sox may be swinging Lowell to the Twins? Anyone here about this with more detail other than the blanket statement?
__________________
Brian - Plus1Handicap (it's a golf thing!)
plus1handicap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 09:04 AM   #47
Gastric ReFlux
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Member #3409
Posts: 8,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshv02
I love Anibal, and I loved GR's Anibal thread even more.

That said, Becket is 25 and a stud. If Anibal has a 30% chance of being a #1/2 pitcher, Becket has a 75% chance -- only contingent on health.

Anytime you can get a top pitcher you do. Great trade!

I'm just happy with didn't trade all our top pitchers for a catcher whom no one likes and who has too many letters in his name!
Yes, I'd agree with that assessment. Beckett is pretty well a proven commodity at this point, and probably the only concern now is the workload he has already had as a young pitcher.

And of course I have a peculiar fondness now for Sanchez, having taken the time to go to see him pitch and score his games pitch by pitch. I just thought he had a lovely fluid delivery, with a nice whiplike action while bringing the arm around.
Gastric ReFlux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 09:11 AM   #48
jaxmagicman
Hall Of Famer
 
jaxmagicman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Retired defloration-maker living in Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 7,801
I am still trying to fathom why the Twins would want another corner infielder.
__________________
See ID


Major League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of MLB Advanced Media, L.P. Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with the permission of Minor League Baseball. All rights reserved.
jaxmagicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 09:12 AM   #49
plus1handicap
Minors (Double A)
 
plus1handicap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Concord, NH
Posts: 139
Lets also not forget that the Beckett trade also makes Wells available for trade - perhaps even Arroyo?
__________________
Brian - Plus1Handicap (it's a golf thing!)
plus1handicap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 01:26 PM   #50
DiMaggio5CF
All Star Reserve
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 921
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melo
Lowell was supposed to start working with his old hitting coach, Larry Denbo. I think Lowell's problem can be corrected. He wasn't getting his hands far enough back before he started his swing and was keeping his front knee bent, which was robbing him of power (credit to Keith Hernandez). If Lowell corrects those issues he can be close to what he was before.
I don't think Lowell is necessarily done, but I wouldn't bet anything on him getting any better. But the thing is that Lowell, even without improving his skills, will put up better numbers hitting in Fenway.

But Beckett is the real prize here. Expect his numbers to go up pitching in the American League, but he's still going to be good.

He's no guarantee to shut down the Yankees because, let's face it, when he beat the Yankees in Game Six of the 2003 World Series, they way they were hitting, you could have shut them down. But that said, that win still got him over the Yankee-indimidation factor, which is afflicting less and less people these days.

The biggest issue with Beckett is the injuries. It's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when -- and the Sox fans just has to hope that he doesn't go down at the most important times.

The deal was that the team that got Beckett would have to deal with Lowell. But the Red Sox, because of their park, got the stud in Beckett and a guy who can actually help them in Lowell.

As a Yankee fan, I hate this trade, but I have to admit that it was a great job by the Red Sox.

And the Rangers, by the way, even though they would have to give up much more than the Red Sox had to, dropped the ball. They're on the verge of being a serious contender, and all they need is pitching, and this was a chance to get a good young pitcher. I could understand the refusal to trade prospects for a veteran, but Beckett would fit in perfectly with their young team.
DiMaggio5CF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 01:27 PM   #51
DiMaggio5CF
All Star Reserve
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 921
Quote:
Originally Posted by plus1handicap
Lets also not forget that the Beckett trade also makes Wells available for trade - perhaps even Arroyo?
Arroyo will bring them something of value, but Wells will not.
DiMaggio5CF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 02:41 PM   #52
darkhorse
Hall Of Famer
 
darkhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: fort worth, tx
Posts: 10,850
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiMaggio5CF
1. And the Rangers, by the way, even though they would have to give up much more than the Red Sox had to, dropped the ball.

2. They're on the verge of being a serious contender, and all they need is pitching, and this was a chance to get a good young pitcher.

3. I could understand the refusal to trade prospects for a veteran, but Beckett would fit in perfectly with their young team.
1. Hardly, they made a good offer, better than the Red Sox, and it was rejected.

2. Beckett isn't the only option.

3. The Rangers offered John Danks, the best pitching prospect in their minor league system, along with Hank Blalock.
__________________
"The Human Torch was denied a bank loan."
darkhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 02:47 PM   #53
ozziethesaint
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Peoria IL
Posts: 831
The Rangers should thank god that their offer was refused. Beckett will continue spending way too much time on the DL. To give up Danks and Blalock for a guy that's been on the DL 11 times in 5 seasons would be stupid
ozziethesaint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 02:54 PM   #54
QuestGAV
Hall Of Famer
 
QuestGAV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozziethesaint
The Rangers should thank god that their offer was refused. Beckett will continue spending way too much time on the DL. To give up Danks and Blalock for a guy that's been on the DL 11 times in 5 seasons would be stupid


Does anyone else like the deal even more now that ozzie has registered his objection?
QuestGAV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 02:59 PM   #55
ozziethesaint
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Peoria IL
Posts: 831
well just cause you don't like me, you can't argue the fact that Beckett has consistently struggled with blisters and spends a lot of time on the DL.
ozziethesaint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 03:00 PM   #56
three staR
Minors (Rookie Ball)
 
three staR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 24
I think Boston get's the better part of this deal. Beckett, in my opinion, is a good pitcher with a lot of upside. Lowell was already a good hitter and I am sure he can fix up his technique and become a power hitter again, maybe replacing Manny in the Red Sox lineup (assuming Manny leaves this year).
three staR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 03:02 PM   #57
QuestGAV
Hall Of Famer
 
QuestGAV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozziethesaint
well just cause you don't like me, you can't argue the fact that Beckett has consistently struggled with blisters and spends a lot of time on the DL.
It's not that I don't like you. It's that I think your analysis is consistently assbackward. If that trend continues with this post then the Red Sox have done a wonderful job!
QuestGAV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 03:13 PM   #58
TotalEnd98
All Star Starter
 
TotalEnd98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 1,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by three staR
Lowell was already a good hitter and I am sure he can fix up his technique and become a power hitter again, maybe replacing Manny in the Red Sox lineup (assuming Manny leaves this year).
I think I've got just as much of a shot as Lowell does at hitting well enough to replace Manny's production.
__________________
OTBL - Scandinavia Cartoon Heroes

This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper.


TotalEnd98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 03:24 PM   #59
mh2365
Banned
 
mh2365's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: louisville
Posts: 14,941
Infractions: 0/2 (101)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozziethesaint
The Rangers should thank god that their offer was refused. Beckett will continue spending way too much time on the DL. To give up Danks and Blalock for a guy that's been on the DL 11 times in 5 seasons would be stupid

25 years old and has averaged 25 starts a year over the last 4 years. Going to a team who has been known in the past NOT to overwork their pitchers (Pedro started what once every 10 days?) instead of being on a team who blows out young arms all the time.

Blalock is a decent player but his stats have gone down 2 years in a row now. Danks could be good, but that's the thing Beckett is good, Danks could be good. No guarentee. Rangers made a mistake on this one plain and simple. Now history may prove that wrong but going on what is known right now .... Rangers made a mistake.
mh2365 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 03:37 PM   #60
three staR
Minors (Rookie Ball)
 
three staR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by TotalEnd98
I think I've got just as much of a shot as Lowell does at hitting well enough to replace Manny's production.
Well maybe "replace" was too strong of a word. I meant more of, alleviating Manny's production loss.
three staR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:17 PM.

 

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com.

Officially Licensed Product – MLB Players, Inc.

Out of the Park Baseball is a registered trademark of Out of the Park Developments GmbH & Co. KG

Google Play is a trademark of Google Inc.

Apple, iPhone, iPod touch and iPad are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.

COPYRIGHT © 2023 OUT OF THE PARK DEVELOPMENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2024 Out of the Park Developments