for your solo league, what team cash max setting do you guys play with? - Page 2

Deitrus · 05-01-2004, 12:22 PM

$32mil/no cap/default TV

*edit*
forgot to mention. I am seriously considering adding $1mil every five years/seasons to allow for "cost of living" increases. There will be a limit, however. For example, I will not go past $65mil May sound funnny but hey.....its my league.

jbmagic · 05-06-2004, 01:00 PM

For Only use National TV minium do you have it on yes or no?

seems like 50 million cash max and default for national tv is what everyone likes so far.....

KurtBevacqua · 05-06-2004, 02:33 PM

The capitalist that I am, I wish we had the option to just ditch this feature altogether. Some other options would be to allow us to recapitalize earned income for stadium proposals. Maybe in V7. Anyway, I find it's rather easy to keep a team operating in the black and wish the financial engine made the net income side of the game more difficult to maintain and more punitive if you run up a deficit. I also think crowd sizes are too large. IRL you have teams like Montreal drawing 4,000 a game, but in OOTP 20K is considered a poor crowd.

Henry · 05-06-2004, 02:35 PM

Well, the crowd size has been significantly reduced in V6 from V5

Henry

Cowboys3356 · 05-06-2004, 11:08 PM

75 mil max, no cap, custom tv contracts

A low cash max only hurts the CPU and makes the game easier. It is a much greater challenge when the CPU has tons of money to buy any player it wants. Plus I like the big market teams to carry huge payrolls with All Star like rosters while I maintain a very low payroll and try to battle it out with them.

I think the key to limit yourself with a low salary cap but give the CPU a ton of freedom to spend whatever it wants to try and beat you!

jbmagic · 05-07-2004, 12:08 AM

i tought with high team cash max , it makes the cpu teams not spend much because they end up saving the money than spending it...

i tought it was a bug that cpu teams are not using there cash they have on hand to there fullest ...

is this true?

jbmagic · 05-13-2004, 03:36 PM

bump.

05-01-2004, 12:22 PM	#21
Deitrus All Star Reserve Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: United States Posts: 535	$32mil/no cap/default TV edit forgot to mention. I am seriously considering adding $1mil every five years/seasons to allow for "cost of living" increases. There will be a limit, however. For example, I will not go past $65mil May sound funnny but hey.....its my league. Last edited by Deitrus; 05-01-2004 at 12:25 PM.

05-06-2004, 01:00 PM	#22
jbmagic Hall Of Famer Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 3,417	For Only use National TV minium do you have it on yes or no? seems like 50 million cash max and default for national tv is what everyone likes so far..... Last edited by jbmagic; 05-13-2004 at 04:44 PM.

05-06-2004, 02:33 PM	#23
KurtBevacqua Hall Of Famer Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 2,968	The capitalist that I am, I wish we had the option to just ditch this feature altogether. Some other options would be to allow us to recapitalize earned income for stadium proposals. Maybe in V7. Anyway, I find it's rather easy to keep a team operating in the black and wish the financial engine made the net income side of the game more difficult to maintain and more punitive if you run up a deficit. I also think crowd sizes are too large. IRL you have teams like Montreal drawing 4,000 a game, but in OOTP 20K is considered a poor crowd. __________________ "The type and formula of most schemes of philanthropy or humanitarianism is this: A and B put their heads together to decide what C shall be made to do for D. The radical vice of all these schemes, from a sociological point of view, is that C is not allowed a voice in the matter, and his position, character, and interests, as well as the ultimate effects on society through C's interests, are entirely overlooked. I call C the Forgotten Man" - William Graham Sumner

05-06-2004, 02:35 PM	#24
Henry Hall of Fame Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 6,498	Well, the crowd size has been significantly reduced in V6 from V5 Henry

05-06-2004, 11:08 PM	#25
Cowboys3356 All Star Starter Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,571	75 mil max, no cap, custom tv contracts A low cash max only hurts the CPU and makes the game easier. It is a much greater challenge when the CPU has tons of money to buy any player it wants. Plus I like the big market teams to carry huge payrolls with All Star like rosters while I maintain a very low payroll and try to battle it out with them. I think the key to limit yourself with a low salary cap but give the CPU a ton of freedom to spend whatever it wants to try and beat you!

05-07-2004, 12:08 AM	#26
jbmagic Hall Of Famer Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 3,417	i tought with high team cash max , it makes the cpu teams not spend much because they end up saving the money than spending it... i tought it was a bug that cpu teams are not using there cash they have on hand to there fullest ... is this true?

05-13-2004, 03:36 PM	#27
jbmagic Hall Of Famer Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 3,417	bump.