|
||||
| ||||
|
|
#21 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 5,031
|
I don't like how the NFL has gone conservative. Its hardly exciting to watch a team take 40 seconds in between every play and struggle. If they lowered the playclock and forced teams to be aggressive, I'd be right back in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 270
|
I wouldn't say I'm over the NFL but I don't watch as much. More than anything I'm sick of the double standard. MLB is held to a much higher standard than the NFL and it pisses my off. The tape scandal in NE and the star players being caught on Steroids would cripple the MLB... while the NFL gets a free pass.
That said this season was one of the most exciting in recent memory. There where at least three head-to-head "play in" games for the playoffs including the last game of the season. What more could you want on the field. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hucknall, Notts, UK
Posts: 4,902
|
I agree, I think the play clock should be 25 all the time, like it is after the clock stops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: East of East
Posts: 3,020
|
Quote:
But for the ending (and because of the ending), the "Red Right 88" game in the divisional round was more of a classic, IMO. ![]() And, as I recall, 1980 also had a classic NFC Divisional Round masterpiece with Dallas's Danny White and Drew Pearson stunning Black Bart and the Atlanta crowd with late-game heroics. And in 1981 the AFC's "Epic" gave way to the "Freezer Bowl", while the NFC got the legendary "The Catch" game. Nostalgia is, indeed, a seductive liar... ...but those were some great times for the NFL.
__________________
History isn't really about the past - settling old scores. It's about defining the present and who we are." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,999
|
Quote:
__________________
For the best in O's news: Orioles' Hangout.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 85
|
that presents a problem after a big play (think 50 yard pass) when it could take nearly that long just to get everyone down there. a better solution would be to make like college where the clock stops moving until the first down chains get moved down the field again (this may only be in the final 2 minutes or something like that.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: East of East
Posts: 3,020
|
I know! I was shocked they were able to pull it off.
__________________
History isn't really about the past - settling old scores. It's about defining the present and who we are." |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The dull edge of the blade
Posts: 867
|
My biggest issue with the NFL is that the officials can have much too much of an influence on the outcome of the game. Look at the Chargers/Colts on Saturday night. San Diego gets three first downs on penalties (I'm not here to argue the legitimacy of the penalties) on it's last drive and wins the game.
Regardless of the circumstances or the legitimacy of the penalties, this type of thing always rubs me the wrong way. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seeking my El Dorado
Posts: 548
Infractions: 0/1 (4)
|
Quote:
No way I call that in that situation. That's like the lame ass traveling call on Villanova against UNC a couple of years ago. They never call it all season long and then call it on the most crucial play of a nail biting game. Ugh. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hucknall, Notts, UK
Posts: 4,902
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Where you live
Posts: 11,017
|
What they need to do is to hire celebrity judges and give out scores according to the performance of the touchdown dance.
__________________
Jonathan Haidt: Moral reasoning is really just a servant masquerading as a high priest. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Interwebs
Posts: 2,862
|
Again, I watched the playoffs and, again, the lady points out the incessant replays and advertisements. I realize that's my major problem with the NFL as it now stands. I still enjoy the sport, but I can't handle the way it is currently presented. It's ridiculous, The Professor explained it perfectly earlier in the thread.
__________________
I was never one to patiently pick up broken fragments and glue them together again and tell myself that the mended whole was as good as new. What is broken is broken -- and I'd rather remember it as it was at its best than mend it and see the broken places as long as I lived.-Margaret Mitchell |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hucknall, Notts, UK
Posts: 4,902
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Interwebs
Posts: 2,862
|
It's even worse this year. I have not watched one minute of the NFL. To be fair, I'm busy with school and work but if someone would have told me this even as little as five years ago I would have laughed at them. I keep up a little with what's going on so I can chat about it casually to classmates/friends but that's about it.
__________________
I was never one to patiently pick up broken fragments and glue them together again and tell myself that the mended whole was as good as new. What is broken is broken -- and I'd rather remember it as it was at its best than mend it and see the broken places as long as I lived.-Margaret Mitchell |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Posts: 8,608
|
I have been over it. The main problem is that the game is just too damn slow. With most other sports, baseball included, you can get unbroken action for 15-20 minutes (or longer).
American football both pro and college is short bits of action split up by nearly infinite numbers of commercial breaks. They grind down my enthusiasm to watch a game pretty quickly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 9,037
|
I have been following the NFL on and off for 20 years now, my first season being '89 when the 49ers crushed the Broncos in the Superbowl.
I still enjoy it, with this year being more interesting than the last few seeing as the Bengals look like making the playoffs. HOWEVER, my one problem with the game relates to the amount of time taken. I just can't handle the fact that the two teams can basically fart around for 28 minutes of each half and then all of a sudden try to fit as many plays in as possible in those last couple of minutes. It's ridiculous that a team can run a play, wait for 45 seconds and then run another one, and then wait another 45 seconds before running the next one. This means that during a period of 90 seconds of game time it's possible that the ball could be "in play" for a handful of seconds. It's ridiculous. Yet, at the end of the half they use timeouts and spike the ball to stop the clock. I really think they should reduce the play clock to 25 seconds, or 30 at the most. These guys are getting paid millions of dollars. They should be able to handle running more plays in each game than they do. Last edited by kenyan_cheena; 11-20-2009 at 11:25 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Posts: 8,608
|
I have no statistics to back this up. But one thing I have noticed from my little NFL watching is how WELL teams do when they go into a hurry our asses off 2 minute offense. It seems like yards gained and points increase significantly.
I would love to see a study done on this and see if it bears any truth. If true, imagine how exciting games would be if teams were in this mode the entire game? If anyone has data about this then please share. I have always wanted to see if my observations were correct. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rivière-du-Loup, Qc
Posts: 4,615
|
Running a full time no-huddle offense requires the right personnel. The Colts can do it because the Colts have Peyton Manning. The Bills tried it this season and the results have been disastrous.
__________________
Free agent baseball fan. Let's go (insert team name here)! |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Posts: 8,608
|
Quote:
High tempo fooball on both sides of the ball. The yards seem to start flowing and scoring increasing. Again I would like to see some confirmation on that but I would be interested. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Up There
Posts: 15,642
|
Quote:
Why on Earth do NFL teams do this?!? The team doesn't have the ball, okay, and you're behind. But the clock is going to stop at the two minute warning anyway, and aren't you going to need your timeouts for when you get the ball back? So why the hell waste them stopping the clock thirty seconds before it's going to stop anyway? Oh, and I hate what the NFL has done in recent years to make it ridiculously easy for quarterbacks. They might as well just retire the intentional grounding rule entirely, because they've completely neutered it. Last edited by Le Grande Orange; 11-21-2009 at 12:03 AM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|