Home | Webstore
Latest News: OOTP 27 Buy Now - FHM 12 Available - OOTP Go! 27 Available

Out of the Park Baseball 27 Buy Now!

  

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Out of the Park Developments > Talk Sports

Talk Sports Discuss everything that is sports-related, like MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA, MLS, NASCAR, NCAA sports and teams, trades, coaches, bad calls etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-29-2007, 02:10 PM   #21
bababui
Hall Of Famer
 
bababui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 14,147
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
You guys are missing a point or two.

1)Dumping Moss frees millions of cap space

2)Moss is disruptive if he doesnt get his way..as good as Brady is, it isnt like he has Culpeppers arm. How many deep balls will he get in the Pats offense?

3)The Lions totally misused/abused Mike Williams. They tried to force him to play TE and they set highly unrealistic weight goals for him. It should be telling that both Kiffin and Norm Chow were pursuing him. They will know how to use him.
bababui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 02:13 PM   #22
magnet
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,029
Quote:
2)Moss is disruptive if he doesnt get his way
Methinks you have no idea what you are talking about here. Example, please?
magnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 02:14 PM   #23
bababui
Hall Of Famer
 
bababui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 14,147
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by magnet View Post
Methinks you have no idea what you are talking about here. Example, please?

Have you been comatose through the last two seasons?
bababui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 02:15 PM   #24
bababui
Hall Of Famer
 
bababui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 14,147
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
Dola

Do you have an understanding of why the Raiders were only able to get a 4th for him?
bababui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 02:15 PM   #25
magnet
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by bababui View Post
Have you been comatose through the last two seasons?
Oh, you mean where he talks about how the Raiders suck?

How can you say that Moss "disrupted" the Raiders? So if he kept his yap shut, they would have won?
magnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 02:16 PM   #26
magnet
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by bababui View Post
Dola

Do you have an understanding of why the Raiders were only able to get a 4th for him?
Yeah. He = old.
magnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 02:17 PM   #27
USN Squid
All Star Reserve
 
USN Squid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 599
Is it week one yet????
USN Squid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 02:18 PM   #28
magnet
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by USN Squid View Post
Is it week one yet????


I knew you'd be excited.
magnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 02:19 PM   #29
bababui
Hall Of Famer
 
bababui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 14,147
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by magnet View Post
Yeah. He = old.
No. He=immature/selfish/a quitter/disruptive to a team.

Read any of the million articles about him. When a player with his physical tools is traded twice in the NFL that says something about that player. When a player is traded that seemingly would be a great asset for a QB like Russell that says something about a player.
bababui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 02:25 PM   #30
magnet
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by bababui View Post
No. He=immature/selfish/a quitter/disruptive to a team.

Read any of the million articles about him. When a player with his physical tools is traded twice in the NFL that says something about that player. When a player is traded that seemingly would be a great asset for a QB like Russell that says something about a player.
I think it says something about the management of the team and the
"what have you done for me lately" mentality of the NFL.

Immature? Sure, in 1999.
Selfish? To a certain extent, yes. His happiness does rest on how well his TEAM is performing, however.
A quitter? Early in his career he could have fallen under this. I think he's changed a LOT from "I play when I want to play".
disruptive to team? You keep spouting this, and I have yet to see one shred of evidence that he actually hampered his team.
magnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 02:32 PM   #31
bababui
Hall Of Famer
 
bababui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 14,147
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by magnet View Post
I think it says something about the management of the team and the
"what have you done for me lately" mentality of the NFL.

Immature? Sure, in 1999.
Selfish? To a certain extent, yes. His happiness does rest on how well his TEAM is performing, however.
A quitter? Early in his career he could have fallen under this. I think he's changed a LOT from "I play when I want to play".
disruptive to team? You keep spouting this, and I have yet to see one shred of evidence that he actually hampered his team.
Well, his quitting on plays and not going 100% didnt sit well with the Raiders. One of several examples...


http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/ar...913506478.html

Quote:
"Moss quit on us last year," one Raiders employee said. "My feeling is he wants to go someplace where they can win. He knows he only has X number of years left and he's never, ever won at any level."
Quote:
"I don't think that works," a personnel director for an AFC team said. "I'd develop other guys. You don't want him. It will be a big story. The story will be him, not your team."
Quote:

Last season, a Raiders source said Moss didn't like quarterback Aaron Brooks from Day 1 and at one point asked to be traded. When the trade didn't happen, Moss basically went through the motions.
"When we didn't trade him he was like a little kid who threw a tantrum when his parents wouldn't give him something," the source said. "So his tantrum was dropping passes."
Quote:
"Unfortunately for Randy, it's everybody else's fault except his," said Carl Peterson, president of the Kansas City Chiefs. "I thought Art (Shell) really tried to work hard this year to make him a leader, but that's not his personality. He's never done anything to hurt the Chiefs."
bababui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 02:34 PM   #32
jbergey22
Hall Of Famer
 
jbergey22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by bababui View Post
You guys are missing a point or two.

1)Dumping Moss frees millions of cap space

2)Moss is disruptive if he doesnt get his way..as good as Brady is, it isnt like he has Culpeppers arm. How many deep balls will he get in the Pats offense?

3)The Lions totally misused/abused Mike Williams. They tried to force him to play TE and they set highly unrealistic weight goals for him. It should be telling that both Kiffin and Norm Chow were pursuing him. They will know how to use him.

1. Good point and Moss needed out of Oakland

2. Moss can play bottom line, he can do other things rather than simply run straight down the field the Brady/Culpepper comparison has no relevance on what Moss will be able to do

3.Mike Williams sucks SIMPLE.
jbergey22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 02:44 PM   #33
mrskippy
All Star Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by mauboy View Post
Russell will impact this year?? As far as I've heard its the other way around.
Potentially, at least in comparison to Quinn. My guess is Kiffin will use McCown or someone else in the interim ... using Russell only when he is ready or when absolutely necessary. I think Russell could be ready much sooner than people expect. A #1 pick should pay off sooner than a later pick.
mrskippy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 02:47 PM   #34
mrskippy
All Star Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by magnet View Post
""!

When was the last real trouble he caused? When he hit that traffic controller downtown 5 years ago? Of course, if you ask ESPN, they'll mention the mooning, and basically saying what everyone already knew about the Raiders last season.
Moss blew a lot of potential catches, let guys intercept the ball right in front of him, and so on. He whined a lot and pretty much was a cancer on the team. Being a cancer on the Raiders is saying something, given the Raiders history of wanting the biggest heads and egos in the NFL.

He didn't like being on a losing team and IMHO his play reflected that.

Nevermind the free cap space that the Raiders can use on more productive, more effective players.

Glad he is gone!!!
mrskippy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 02:47 PM   #35
magnet
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by bababui View Post
Well, his quitting on plays and not going 100% didnt sit well with the Raiders. One of several examples...


http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/ar...913506478.html
And you think that Belichick is going to take that sort of attitude for one second? Not like Randy will act up in NE; they actually win football games out there.

Of course, the "He just wants to win" defense of these actions is pretty thin, and I'll be the first to admit that.
magnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 02:49 PM   #36
magnet
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrskippy View Post
Moss blew a lot of potential catches, let guys intercept the ball right in front of him, and so on. He whined a lot and pretty much was a cancer on the team. Being a cancer on the Raiders is saying something, given the Raiders history of wanting the biggest heads and egos in the NFL.

He didn't like being on a losing team and IMHO his play reflected that.

Nevermind the free cap space that the Raiders can use on more productive, more effective players.

Glad he is gone!!!
No doubt it's good for the Raiders, but I think given Moss's personality when he is on a winning team, and how good of a player he is, NE still got one hell of a steal here. The Vikings got a 2nd rounder for C-Pep, and I'd say Moss was more pivotal to C-Pep than the other way around.
magnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 02:54 PM   #37
mrskippy
All Star Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by bababui View Post
Dola

Do you have an understanding of why the Raiders were only able to get a 4th for him?
Exactly. If he was Randy Moss from his peak in Minnesota, they are getting a #1 pick in 08, a few other picks, and maybe even another decent player in return.

Moss probably has peaked and I don't think he'll ever return to true form. He'll probably do better in NE than in OAK. Good for him.

And, I agree on the Mike Williams comment.

Back to the original topic -- Michael Bush could be the steal of the draft. If he can return to form and his pre-2006 projections (before he was hurt, he was expected to go Top 10 in the draft) he will be the steal.

If Bush works out and if Williams can post good numbers the Raiders will be great. Porter, Williams, and Curry as your main WR, plus Rhodes in the backfield (and eventually Bush getting in at some point), a stud QB -- the Raiders are in good shape. They've added a potentially decent TE.

I'm surprised they didn't try to snag some OL help (a huge weakness), but perhaps that is where the Raiders will put some of their saved cash from Moss.
mrskippy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 02:55 PM   #38
mrskippy
All Star Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by magnet View Post
No doubt it's good for the Raiders, but I think given Moss's personality when he is on a winning team, and how good of a player he is, NE still got one hell of a steal here. The Vikings got a 2nd rounder for C-Pep, and I'd say Moss was more pivotal to C-Pep than the other way around.
If he works out in NE, good for them. He is a good player, no denying. But, he just wasn't going to work in Oakland.

The Raiders are rebuilding and I think they are focused on finally going young for a change.
mrskippy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 03:00 PM   #39
magnet
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrskippy View Post
If he works out in NE, good for them. He is a good player, no denying. But, he just wasn't going to work in Oakland.

The Raiders are rebuilding and I think they are focused on finally going young for a change.
Exactly. If they were to get an older WR, they'd need someone with some leadership qualities to help get Williams and Porter to where they need to be.
magnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 03:00 PM   #40
bababui
Hall Of Famer
 
bababui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 14,147
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by magnet View Post
And you think that Belichick is going to take that sort of attitude for one second? Not like Randy will act up in NE; they actually win football games out there.

Of course, the "He just wants to win" defense of these actions is pretty thin, and I'll be the first to admit that.
I hope you are right and individually Moss succeeds. But maybe this move speaks to the desperation the Pats are facing. And why would they agree to pay Moss a lot more than Branch wanted?? A move that likely cost them a Super Bowl trip.
bababui is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:41 PM.

 

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com.

Officially Licensed Product – MLB Players, Inc.

Out of the Park Baseball is a registered trademark of Out of the Park Developments GmbH & Co. KG

Google Play is a trademark of Google Inc.

Apple, iPhone, iPod touch and iPad are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.

COPYRIGHT © 2023 OUT OF THE PARK DEVELOPMENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2024 Out of the Park Developments