|
||||
| ||||
|
|
#21 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 14,147
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
You guys are missing a point or two.
1)Dumping Moss frees millions of cap space 2)Moss is disruptive if he doesnt get his way..as good as Brady is, it isnt like he has Culpeppers arm. How many deep balls will he get in the Pats offense? 3)The Lions totally misused/abused Mike Williams. They tried to force him to play TE and they set highly unrealistic weight goals for him. It should be telling that both Kiffin and Norm Chow were pursuing him. They will know how to use him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,029
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 14,147
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 14,147
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
Dola
Do you have an understanding of why the Raiders were only able to get a 4th for him? |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 599
|
Is it week one yet????
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 14,147
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
No. He=immature/selfish/a quitter/disruptive to a team.
Read any of the million articles about him. When a player with his physical tools is traded twice in the NFL that says something about that player. When a player is traded that seemingly would be a great asset for a QB like Russell that says something about a player. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,029
|
Quote:
"what have you done for me lately" mentality of the NFL. ![]() Immature? Sure, in 1999. Selfish? To a certain extent, yes. His happiness does rest on how well his TEAM is performing, however. A quitter? Early in his career he could have fallen under this. I think he's changed a LOT from "I play when I want to play". ![]() disruptive to team? You keep spouting this, and I have yet to see one shred of evidence that he actually hampered his team. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |||||
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 14,147
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
Quote:
http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/ar...913506478.html Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,481
|
Quote:
1. Good point and Moss needed out of Oakland 2. Moss can play bottom line, he can do other things rather than simply run straight down the field the Brady/Culpepper comparison has no relevance on what Moss will be able to do 3.Mike Williams sucks SIMPLE. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,011
|
Potentially, at least in comparison to Quinn. My guess is Kiffin will use McCown or someone else in the interim ... using Russell only when he is ready or when absolutely necessary. I think Russell could be ready much sooner than people expect. A #1 pick should pay off sooner than a later pick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,011
|
Quote:
He didn't like being on a losing team and IMHO his play reflected that. Nevermind the free cap space that the Raiders can use on more productive, more effective players. Glad he is gone!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,029
|
Quote:
Of course, the "He just wants to win" defense of these actions is pretty thin, and I'll be the first to admit that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,029
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,011
|
Quote:
Moss probably has peaked and I don't think he'll ever return to true form. He'll probably do better in NE than in OAK. Good for him. And, I agree on the Mike Williams comment. Back to the original topic -- Michael Bush could be the steal of the draft. If he can return to form and his pre-2006 projections (before he was hurt, he was expected to go Top 10 in the draft) he will be the steal. If Bush works out and if Williams can post good numbers the Raiders will be great. Porter, Williams, and Curry as your main WR, plus Rhodes in the backfield (and eventually Bush getting in at some point), a stud QB -- the Raiders are in good shape. They've added a potentially decent TE. I'm surprised they didn't try to snag some OL help (a huge weakness), but perhaps that is where the Raiders will put some of their saved cash from Moss. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,011
|
Quote:
The Raiders are rebuilding and I think they are focused on finally going young for a change. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,029
|
Exactly. If they were to get an older WR, they'd need someone with some leadership qualities to help get Williams and Porter to where they need to be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 14,147
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|