picther ratings - Page 2

rschick · 05-08-2004, 09:38 PM

couple things with this.

-There was no shrinking with the batters ratings, on the contrary, propsects seem to gain on a fairly consistant basis.
- The one full season I did go through, I did not see any young pitching propects ratings improve, in fact those that had made the majors were also shrinking in their ratings. this shrinking seemed exclusive to 'pure stuff'.
- If the game is in fact doing this, how is it handling prospects, or is this V6 asking me to base more of my decisions on stats.
- Henry I just wanted to say a thank you for looking into this, and I don't want you to feel as though I hate the game in point of fact I really like it alot. I think somethings happen much to often during games but the game flows very well.

Henry · 05-09-2004, 07:37 AM

rschick,

I understand :)

With the HUGE change this year to DIPS, Markus move to London - limiting our access to him - and me waiting day-by-day to become a grandpa for the 3rd time - has made it difficult to analyze and uncover all the intricacies of the game. Rest assured, however, that we'll get to the bottom of most of them eventually :D

Henry

mrDriller · 05-28-2004, 02:43 AM

Hey I have this problem too, and I noticed that in the default roster set, no pitcher has a talent rating in stuff higher than 59.

I think this might be the cause of the "shrinking stuff" problem.

I would like to see this fixed, since I always use the default roster.

jbmagic · 05-28-2004, 02:58 AM

the default roster is cbl roster 2.0 just the names change on it

mrDriller · 05-28-2004, 03:15 AM

Well, when I export the Career 2004.lg file into excel, sort by stuff, and then do a search for "talent," the highest rating is 59.

I did the same thing with the CBL 2.0 roster file, and I counted 44 pitchers who have a stuff talent rating of 90 or higher.

So I don't see how these roster files are the same.

mrDriller · 05-28-2004, 01:01 PM

Can we get this bug fixed anytime soon??

05-28-2004, 01:01 PM	#26
mrDriller Bat Boy Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 18	. Can we get this bug fixed anytime soon??

05-08-2004, 09:38 PM	#21
rschick Bat Boy Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 14	couple things with this. -There was no shrinking with the batters ratings, on the contrary, propsects seem to gain on a fairly consistant basis. - The one full season I did go through, I did not see any young pitching propects ratings improve, in fact those that had made the majors were also shrinking in their ratings. this shrinking seemed exclusive to 'pure stuff'. - If the game is in fact doing this, how is it handling prospects, or is this V6 asking me to base more of my decisions on stats. - Henry I just wanted to say a thank you for looking into this, and I don't want you to feel as though I hate the game in point of fact I really like it alot. I think somethings happen much to often during games but the game flows very well.

05-09-2004, 07:37 AM	#22
Henry Hall of Fame Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 6,498	rschick, I understand :) With the HUGE change this year to DIPS, Markus move to London - limiting our access to him - and me waiting day-by-day to become a grandpa for the 3rd time - has made it difficult to analyze and uncover all the intricacies of the game. Rest assured, however, that we'll get to the bottom of most of them eventually :D Henry

05-28-2004, 02:43 AM	#23
mrDriller Bat Boy Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 18	Hey I have this problem too, and I noticed that in the default roster set, no pitcher has a talent rating in stuff higher than 59. I think this might be the cause of the "shrinking stuff" problem. I would like to see this fixed, since I always use the default roster.

05-28-2004, 02:58 AM	#24
jbmagic Hall Of Famer Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 3,417	the default roster is cbl roster 2.0 just the names change on it

05-28-2004, 03:15 AM	#25
mrDriller Bat Boy Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 18	Well, when I export the Career 2004.lg file into excel, sort by stuff, and then do a search for "talent," the highest rating is 59. I did the same thing with the CBL 2.0 roster file, and I counted 44 pitchers who have a stuff talent rating of 90 or higher. So I don't see how these roster files are the same.