Historical Aging

[lawrence97]

For the first time, i'm actually going into the salary cup era in historical play, and i've noticed that as i get close to this years date, all the players aging stats are getting shorter and shorter. Most players have a 10 for aging as of 2009/2010 draft

I'm assuming as i get closer to 2025/2026, they'll continue to get shorter as the game maybe calculates their aging number to what age they stopped playing in the nhl even if they are still active? And as most look like they stop at 30, the game is adapting.

Anyone else see this? I will check to see how players get on over the coming years, but ideally active players now in historical seasons if i'm right shouldn't get such low aging numbers.

I've just started a standard game, and i'll check players such as Panarin and others to see if they have the same aging number

Panarin Regular-15 Historical-12

Stone Regular-14 Historical-11

Seguin-Regular-14-Historical-10(that or 11 before i updated it)

Kuznetsov-Regular12 Historical-10

Will get a bit tedious if i have to update everyones aging for the next 10 years

[lawrence97]

Yep i'm headed into 2016/2017 season, and i've yet to find any player with an aging of 12 or higher. Its going to have a negative effect on the game with players aging too fast, please can this be looked at. Its very tedious increasing the stats on 30 players or so every draft just so that most players dont start regressing well before 30.

[Sebastian Palkowski]

Hopefully Jeffs looks into this and tells you if this is intended that way or if we need to fix this.