Sigh. Game still doesn't recognize combined no-hitters.

Westheim · 05-20-2020, 02:30 AM

Is it really that difficult? (slightly annoyed tone)

IF team hits = 0
THEN spawn news article #2748

That's the pig latin version of coding, but how much harder than this can it be? Come on, boys, after 20 versions.....

Btw, Yamamoto walked five of the first six batters in the second, and another run scored on a groundout.

Sizeman21 · 05-20-2020, 11:44 AM

What a pathetic no hitter. I'd never want that one in the record books under my name.

Why does this box score make me so angry!?

Walking a run in is pathetic by itself. But two runs by walk?

I guess Yama was just having a bad day.

CBeisbol · 05-20-2020, 11:52 AM

I agree with the first post much more than the second one.

ALL no-hitters are combined since the team's pitcher(s) and other defensive players combine to hold the other team to no hits.

I don't see what the big deal is about if a no-hitter takes 9 players (1 pitcher and 8 other fielders) or 15 players (say, 3 pitchers and 12 other defensive players). No hits is no hits.

TomVeal · 05-20-2020, 12:22 PM

Low quality no-hitters ought to be recorded so that we can look back on them and roll our eyes in disbelief (or, since it's the Marlins, in weary belief).

CBeisbol · 05-20-2020, 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomVeal

disbelief

Meh
I believe that pitchers can both 1) give up a lot of walks, and 2) combine with their defense to prevent hits

05-20-2020, 02:30 AM	#1
Westheim Hall Of Famer Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Germany Posts: 14,045	Sigh. Game still doesn't recognize combined no-hitters. Is it really that difficult? (slightly annoyed tone) IF team hits = 0 THEN spawn news article #2748 That's the pig latin version of coding, but how much harder than this can it be? Come on, boys, after 20 versions..... Btw, Yamamoto walked five of the first six batters in the second, and another run scored on a groundout. Attached Images __________________ Portland Raccoons, 95 years of excell-.... of baseball: Furballs here! 1983 * 1989 * 1991 * 1992 * 1993 * 1995 * 1996 * 2010 * 2017 * 2018 * 2019 * 2026 * 2028 * 2035 * 2037 * 2044 * 2045 * 2046 * 2047 * 2048 * 2051 * 2054 * 2055 * 2061 * 2071 1 OSANAI : 2 POWELL : 7 NOMURA \| RAMOS : 8 REECE : 10 BROWN : 15 HALL : 27 FERNANDEZ : 28 CASAS : 31 CARMONA : 32 WEST : 39 TONER : 46 SAITO Resident Mets Cynic - The Mets from 1962 onwards, here.

05-20-2020, 11:44 AM	#2
Sizeman21 Major Leagues Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: The bleachers of Sportsman's Park Posts: 435	What a pathetic no hitter. I'd never want that one in the record books under my name. Why does this box score make me so angry!? Walking a run in is pathetic by itself. But two runs by walk? I guess Yama was just having a bad day. __________________

05-20-2020, 11:52 AM	#3
CBeisbol Banned Join Date: Aug 2019 Location: Ban land in 3...2... Posts: 2,943	I agree with the first post much more than the second one. ALL no-hitters are combined since the team's pitcher(s) and other defensive players combine to hold the other team to no hits. I don't see what the big deal is about if a no-hitter takes 9 players (1 pitcher and 8 other fielders) or 15 players (say, 3 pitchers and 12 other defensive players). No hits is no hits.

05-20-2020, 12:22 PM	#4
TomVeal All Star Starter Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: Spanaway, Washington Posts: 1,257	Low quality no-hitters ought to be recorded so that we can look back on them and roll our eyes in disbelief (or, since it's the Marlins, in weary belief).