Home | Webstore
Latest News: OOTP 27 Buy Now - FHM 12 Available - OOTP Go! 27 Available

Out of the Park Baseball 27 Buy Now!

  

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Prior Versions of Our Games > Out of the Park Baseball 14 > OOTP 14 - General Discussions

OOTP 14 - General Discussions Discuss the new 2013 version of Out of the Park Baseball here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-30-2013, 07:58 PM   #21
VanillaGorilla
All Star Starter
 
VanillaGorilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,371
Getting back to the subject of the OP.....

Fisk struck out 24 times against Nolan Ryan (t-9th).

Porter struck out 23 times against Nolan Ryan (t-11th).

See.....RIGHT in the conversation!
VanillaGorilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 08:12 PM   #22
David Watts
Hall Of Famer
 
David Watts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking for a place called Leehofooks
Posts: 10,161
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
Well things aren't getting better....1981 Nolan 3 relief appearances, 8 innings pitched, 16 hits, 4 walks, 1 hr allowed, 7.88 ERA, 2.50 whip and an amazing 45 era+
David Watts is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 08:36 PM   #23
David Watts
Hall Of Famer
 
David Watts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking for a place called Leehofooks
Posts: 10,161
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Wolf View Post
That's him. Twenty-some points above the Mendoza Line.

Who is your best hitter?
Ugh, just got home from work and Porter was my best hitter. My bad. Remember, I manage only. I have no control over who plays for my team.
David Watts is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 09:43 PM   #24
The Wolf
Hall Of Famer
 
The Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All alone
Posts: 12,603
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by lukasberger View Post
In The New Bill James Historical Baseball Abstract, James ranks Porter as the 18th greatest catcher ever. A borderline HOFer.

So I'm really not sure what you think you got from Bill James. It wasn't that Porter was average, that's for sure.
It very much was. Bill ranked hitters into 7 grades by OPS in his essay "The 96 Families of Hitters." Under that system Porter is a Grade D, average hitter.

You guys are confusing his relative performance with others at a traditionally underperforming position to claim that he had value. Apples and oranges: as a hitter, he was average.
__________________
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markus Heinsohn View Post
Well, the average OOTP user...downloads the game, manages his favorite team and that's it.
According to OOTP itself, OOTP MLB play (modern and historical) outnumbers OOTP fictional play three to one.

Five thousand thanks for a non-modder? I never thought I'd see the day. Thank you for your support.
The Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 09:47 PM   #25
Questdog
Hall Of Famer
 
Questdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In a dark, damp cave where I'm training slugs to run the bases......
Posts: 16,142
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Wolf View Post
It very much was. Bill ranked hitters into 7 grades by OPS in his essay "The 96 Families of Hitters." Under that system Porter is a Grade D, average hitter.

You guys are confusing his relative performance with others at a traditionally underperforming position to claim that he had value. Apples and oranges: as a hitter, he was average.
You are the confused one......Bill James says that a player who performs at a rate of more than 50 points over the league average OPS is a "D - Average"?....
Questdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 09:49 PM   #26
The Wolf
Hall Of Famer
 
The Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All alone
Posts: 12,603
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
And I'm done. If anyone thinks that career .244 BA Darrell Porter was a good HITTER - bearing in mind that .220 is the Mendoza Line - you can go argue with reality.
__________________
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markus Heinsohn View Post
Well, the average OOTP user...downloads the game, manages his favorite team and that's it.
According to OOTP itself, OOTP MLB play (modern and historical) outnumbers OOTP fictional play three to one.

Five thousand thanks for a non-modder? I never thought I'd see the day. Thank you for your support.
The Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 09:56 PM   #27
Questdog
Hall Of Famer
 
Questdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In a dark, damp cave where I'm training slugs to run the bases......
Posts: 16,142
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Wolf View Post
And I'm done. If anyone thinks that career .244 BA Darrell Porter was a good HITTER - bearing in mind that .220 is the Mendoza Line - you can go argue with reality.
Only person arguing is you...everybody else pretty much sees him as a real good player......even Bill James.....18th best catcher ever?....
Questdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 10:19 PM   #28
David Watts
Hall Of Famer
 
David Watts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking for a place called Leehofooks
Posts: 10,161
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
When did .220 become the Mendoza line?
David Watts is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 10:20 PM   #29
tayloraj
Minors (Double A)
 
tayloraj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 165
Even leaving aside the fact that a lot of his value comes from being a catcher, as a hitter only he's decidedly somewhat above average. Sure, his batting average was low, but that really isn't an accurate measure of his value as a hitter. He made up for the .247 BA by drawing lots of walks, hitting for mid-range power (especially in the context of the era in which he played), and avoiding double plays.
tayloraj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 10:40 PM   #30
Questdog
Hall Of Famer
 
Questdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In a dark, damp cave where I'm training slugs to run the bases......
Posts: 16,142
Quote:
Originally Posted by tayloraj View Post
Even leaving aside the fact that a lot of his value comes from being a catcher, as a hitter only he's decidedly somewhat above average. Sure, his batting average was low, but that really isn't an accurate measure of his value as a hitter. He made up for the .247 BA by drawing lots of walks, hitting for mid-range power (especially in the context of the era in which he played), and avoiding double plays.
Don't forget the ball parks.....Royals and Busch were usually around 0.700 for Home Runs......
Questdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 11:10 PM   #31
VanillaGorilla
All Star Starter
 
VanillaGorilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Questdog View Post
Don't forget the ball parks.....Royals and Busch were usually around 0.700 for Home Runs......
You fools.

All that matters is BA. Wolf said so. Quit denying reality. I don't have to actually read Bill James to know that you old fogies need to get in the 21st Century and stop wasting your time with anything other than batting average, because THAT is the essence of ALL of Bill James' works....batting average rules!

And Johnny Bench is the 126th best catcher, ever.

But, to humor you sticks in the mud (why do I bother?) I went to your antiquated and useless WAR stat.

Porter ranks 22nd on the WAR list. Carter (2nd), Fisk (4th), and Simmons (10th) are all ahead of Porter.

--------------------

I do agree that for the totality of their respective careers, Porter brings up the rear of that pack. But to be the 4th of 4 for a 17 year period and the only folks you trail are top 10 All-Timers, I am very comfortable in labeling Porter as an elite offensive catcher in the time frame of 1971 through 1987.



Of course, I really don't understand all these new fangled stats like 'batting average'. Maybe there IS something to them...but long division is so hard. I'm better off having people tell me what is reality than examining it, myself.
VanillaGorilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 12:17 AM   #32
The Game
Hall Of Famer
 
The Game's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Inside The Game
Posts: 30,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Wolf View Post
And I'm done. If anyone thinks that career .244 BA Darrell Porter was a good HITTER - bearing in mind that .220 is the Mendoza Line - you can go argue with reality.
Mendoza Line is .200 not .220. I am guessing this was a typo on your part.

Edit: Personal opinion. Darrell Porter for his era was a great offensive C. Who else was really better in the 70's? Fisk, Munson and who else? Career CS of 38% pretty darn good also.

Last edited by The Game; 05-31-2013 at 12:22 AM.
The Game is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 12:32 AM   #33
tayloraj
Minors (Double A)
 
tayloraj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Game View Post
Who else was really better in the 70's?
Dr. Bench, calling Dr. Bench...

But, really, the 70s were a strong era for catchers. Fisk Bench, Munson, Bob Boone...and that's just the guys born in 1947. Porter, Simmons, Carter, Sundberg...not all of them may have been great hitters (I'm looking at you, Bob and Jim), but overall one of the strongest eras in terms of overall catching talent.
tayloraj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 06:05 AM   #34
DrSatan
All Star Reserve
 
DrSatan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 627
Over the years I must have played dozens of historical leagues, and Nolan Ryan has sucked every time. I've manually edited his control ratings (the default is always super low), and he still craps out. I've even imported him into multiple fictional leagues, and he still craps out. The best I've ever seen him do was an average career in the bullpen.

On the other hand, Don Mattingly has been a HOF'r nearly every damn time I've had him in a league, and if the baseball gods were just, the same would've happened in real life.

Other guys I've noticed consistently bottom out are Wade Boggs, Bob Gibson, Dwight Gooden, Rickey Henderson, Lou Brock, and Ken Griffey Jr. I don't know how anybody else has faired, but for me it seems OOTP just hates these cats.
DrSatan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 07:48 AM   #35
David Watts
Hall Of Famer
 
David Watts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking for a place called Leehofooks
Posts: 10,161
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
Since Porter has become such a hot topic, I thought I should tell y'all about his start to the 81 season. I am 2 games into June and he is leading the NL in batting average, hitting in the .370's. He was just named player of the month for May. He has 7 home runs and is 4th in the league in rbi. Yeah, I know this won't last all season, but what a nice couple of months.

Meanwhile, my Astros are sitting on top in the NL West. Only by a game though. We just finished a rough week and have lost our last 3 in a row.

Ryan is still in the bullpen. His last 2 appearances were solid and he has lowered his era into the 5's.
David Watts is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2013, 09:44 AM   #36
David Watts
Hall Of Famer
 
David Watts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking for a place called Leehofooks
Posts: 10,161
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
The 81 season is over and wow did Nolan turn things around. As mentioned earlier, Ryan started the 81 season in the bullpen and got off to a really bad start. About mid June he started to get his act together and I was actually able to use him more often. He was still walking hitters, but his hits allowed were down and his k's were through the roof. Late July he enters a game following a rain delay and goes 4 innings striking out 11.

On August 8th Bobby Jones suffers a season ending injury. This gets Ryan out of the bullpen and into the rotation. To say he thrived would be an understatement. 8 starts, 8 straight wins. He finished the season with a 10-1 record with a 2.64 era. Over 122 innings he allowed 96 hits, walked 76 and whiffed 137.

We won the division beating out the Los Angeles Heroes by 2 games, but lost to the St Louis Vultures 4-1 in the playoffs. St Louis would go on to defeat the Cleveland Spiders in the World Series. In two starts in the playoffs Nolan didn't fare too well, going 0-1 with a 7.27 era. The second start was a rain shortened start.

As the offseason got under way, I now had my fingers crossed that my GM would re-sign Nolan and keep him in Houston a little longer. Ugh! He tried, but failed. Ryan signed a 3 year deal with the Washington Flyers.

As for Darrell Porter, he came back to earth after his mvp like first two months. He finished the season hitting .266 with 12 homers and 65 runs batted in. He once again got on base at a fare clip .364.

Our first round draft pick Mark Mcgwire led the league with 34 home runs.

Last edited by David Watts; 06-02-2013 at 09:47 AM.
David Watts is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2013, 10:52 AM   #37
struggles_mightily
Minors (Triple A)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 292
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Wolf View Post
It very much was. Bill ranked hitters into 7 grades by OPS in his essay "The 96 Families of Hitters." Under that system Porter is a Grade D, average hitter.
Have you read the essay or just seen the scale as reproduced on the Wikipedia entry for OPS? If you have, how does James handle the issue of translating for run environments? How does he address career versus peak hitting?
struggles_mightily is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2013, 08:37 AM   #38
David Watts
Hall Of Famer
 
David Watts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking for a place called Leehofooks
Posts: 10,161
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
Ugh, this game hates me. The 82 season has reached August and Nolan Ryan is 14-7 with 167 k's. After all the headaches he caused me, I knew it was a given he would thrive elsewhere.

In other news, Mike Schmidt has 31 home runs so far. The league record is 36 (144 game schedule). Going to be interesting to see if he can reach 40.
David Watts is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08 PM.

 

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com.

Officially Licensed Product – MLB Players, Inc.

Out of the Park Baseball is a registered trademark of Out of the Park Developments GmbH & Co. KG

Google Play is a trademark of Google Inc.

Apple, iPhone, iPod touch and iPad are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.

COPYRIGHT © 2023 OUT OF THE PARK DEVELOPMENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2024 Out of the Park Developments