Home | Webstore
Latest News: OOTP 26 Available - FHM 12 Available - OOTP Go! Available

Out of the Park Baseball 26 Buy Now!

  

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Out of the Park Developments > Talk Sports

Talk Sports Discuss everything that is sports-related, like MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA, MLS, NASCAR, NCAA sports and teams, trades, coaches, bad calls etc.

View Poll Results: Do You Think Bonds Juiced in 2001?
Yes 97 78.23%
No 12 9.68%
Don't Know 15 12.10%
Voters: 124. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-03-2004, 05:52 PM   #1
UngratefulDead
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 3,415
Bonds Poll

Putting Bonds' name in a thread title should garauntee me a whole lotta views.
UngratefulDead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 05:53 PM   #2
Steve Kuffrey
Administrator
 
Steve Kuffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: S.E. TN - Georgia born and raised
Posts: 17,023
No poll?
__________________
Steve Kuffrey
DABS Atlanta Braves - 2008 Eastern Division Champ
*DBLC Atlanta Braves - 2011, 2014 East Division Champ, 2012, 2013 NL Wildcard
Baseball Maelstrom-Montreal Expos-2013 Tourney winner, 2014 WC Team
Sparky's League - Tampa Bay D'Rays
Epicenter Baseball League - Astros 2014
The CBL Rewind - Phillies '95
Steve Kuffrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 05:53 PM   #3
UngratefulDead
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 3,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Kuffrey
No poll?
I wonder why it always posts the thread before the poll. Doesn't really make sense to me.
UngratefulDead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 05:54 PM   #4
UngratefulDead
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 3,415
To explain my vote, I chose 'Don't Know'. I honestly don't think I have enough information to choose either way. I hope he didn't, but I wouldn't be surprised if he did either. There is evidence both ways, and I'm not going to choose to ignore one of the camps just because I want it that way.
UngratefulDead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 05:58 PM   #5
Skipaway
Hall Of Famer
 
Skipaway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Where you live
Posts: 11,017
I think from the currently revealed data, Bonds used steroids from 2001-2003 at least.
__________________
Jonathan Haidt: Moral reasoning is really just a servant masquerading as a high priest.
Skipaway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 06:09 PM   #6
CMH
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,057
Since the question only asks if I believe he did then I will say yes.

I still maintain my stance that he is innocent until proven guilty by the court of law.
CMH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 06:19 PM   #7
Eckstein 4 Prez
Hall Of Famer
 
Eckstein 4 Prez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The OC
Posts: 6,358
Of course I think he did, but what's the point of the question?
__________________
Looking for an insomnia cure? Check out my dynasty thread, The Dawn of American Professional Base Ball, 1871.
Eckstein 4 Prez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 06:22 PM   #8
Long_Long_Name
Hall Of Famer
 
Long_Long_Name's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Montréal
Posts: 7,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eckstein 4 Prez
what's the point of the question?
Pretty much what he said.
__________________
Beta Baseball. Join it!
Long_Long_Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 06:26 PM   #9
CommishJoe
Global Moderator
 
CommishJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 5,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eckstein 4 Prez
Of course I think he did, but what's the point of the question?
What's the point of any post on this message board?
__________________
Joe

Success isn’t owned. It’s leased. And rent is due every day.
CommishJoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 06:30 PM   #10
The Smirking Chimp
Minors (Double A)
 
The Smirking Chimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 173
Quote:
Originally Posted by UngratefulDead
To explain my vote, I chose 'Don't Know'. I honestly don't think I have enough information to choose either way. I hope he didn't, but I wouldn't be surprised if he did either. There is evidence both ways, and I'm not going to choose to ignore one of the camps just because I want it that way.
what is the evidence that he didn't juice in 2001? I wasn't aware of any.
The Smirking Chimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 06:45 PM   #11
Karros270
Hall Of Famer
 
Karros270's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,392
Bonds said he only used steroids in 2003. Therefore that clears up any doubts about his use prior to that. After all, he was under oath and I'm sure would not lie. I'm glad it has all been cleared up.
__________________
now everybody's praying...don't prey on me
Karros270 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 06:47 PM   #12
Skipaway
Hall Of Famer
 
Skipaway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Where you live
Posts: 11,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by CommishJoe
What's the point of any post on this message board?
+1?
__________________
Jonathan Haidt: Moral reasoning is really just a servant masquerading as a high priest.
Skipaway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 06:49 PM   #13
The Smirking Chimp
Minors (Double A)
 
The Smirking Chimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karros270
Bonds said he only used steroids in 2003. Therefore that clears up any doubts about his use prior to that. After all, he was under oath and I'm sure would not lie. I'm glad it has all been cleared up.
ROFL gotcha.

I assume the grand jury testimony is what the original author was referring to, I guess they are ignoring the grand jury testimony from Sheff and Giambi that contradicts this.
The Smirking Chimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 08:11 PM   #14
UngratefulDead
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 3,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Smirking Chimp
what is the evidence that he didn't juice in 2001? I wasn't aware of any.
The fact that he hasn't suffered any of the negative side effects (or if he has it hasn't been apparent). Besides, innocent until proven guilty, I merely meant that there hasn't been enough evidence in my eyes to conclusively prove it in either direction.
UngratefulDead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 08:22 PM   #15
Joshv02
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: , "
Posts: 3,082
Grand juries aint so grand.
__________________
Brookline Maccabees. RIP
Joshv02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 08:40 PM   #16
rem
Hall Of Famer
 
rem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: College Park, Md.
Posts: 5,024
I'm sorry but why the **** would someone start taking the juice AFTER hitting 73 homeruns?
__________________
OTBA: Washington Filibusters
CLBR: Minnesota Twins

2005 Winner of LL's Pick the Loser Contest! - 15-0
rem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 08:50 PM   #17
Long_Long_Name
Hall Of Famer
 
Long_Long_Name's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Montréal
Posts: 7,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by remangiii
I'm sorry but why the **** would someone start taking the juice AFTER hitting 73 homeruns?
To.... maintain that level?
__________________
Beta Baseball. Join it!
Long_Long_Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 08:56 PM   #18
The Smirking Chimp
Minors (Double A)
 
The Smirking Chimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 173
Quote:
Originally Posted by UngratefulDead
The fact that he hasn't suffered any of the negative side effects (or if he has it hasn't been apparent). Besides, innocent until proven guilty, I merely meant that there hasn't been enough evidence in my eyes to conclusively prove it in either direction.
Fair enough, well said.
The Smirking Chimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 08:58 PM   #19
Terpripken
All Star Starter
 
Terpripken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Safety Harbor, FL
Posts: 1,525
...I thought this was a "Bond" Poll....

No that was the other pointless thread I was posting on all afternoon.
Terpripken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2004, 04:26 PM   #20
benchwarmer
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Red Sox Nation
Posts: 1,461
I couldn't hit NO fast enough on this poll.
benchwarmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 AM.

 

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com.

Officially Licensed Product – MLB Players, Inc.

Out of the Park Baseball is a registered trademark of Out of the Park Developments GmbH & Co. KG

Google Play is a trademark of Google Inc.

Apple, iPhone, iPod touch and iPad are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.

COPYRIGHT © 2023 OUT OF THE PARK DEVELOPMENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2024 Out of the Park Developments