Fittness For Tactics

[redtiger7]

How does the prgram determine wether a player is a great/good/bad/terrible fit for a specific tactic?

What constitutes a "good" skill. For example, when the description says: "works best when players have good passing skills," how high would a player's passing have to be to be considered "good"?

[raymck1963]

IMO if I see 15 highlited green, I consider that good!

Sent from my SM-G965W using Tapatalk

[tomkmb]

Yeah I've had this on various different sets too - I've mentioned it before. It's hard to know if the problem lies in the actual tactical set or the descriptions provided to the player underneath.

[SR000]

Some of them are unclear. Like the 1-1-3 DZ tactic. It states center should have good checking skills but if you try different players out there you will see guys with bad checking come up as good fits. I believe it should read centers with good stickchecking.

[tomkmb]

Originally Posted by SR000

Some of them are unclear. Like the 1-1-3 DZ tactic. It states center should have good checking skills but if you try different players out there you will see guys with bad checking come up as good fits. I believe it should read centers with good stickchecking.

Yeah it’s nonsensical at times and frustrating, with other elements of tactics still being fairly opaque it does need fixing. I’ve reported it in the beta forums months ago, so hopefully it’s on the list.

[Savoie45]

Originally Posted by tomkmb

Yeah I've had this on various different sets too - I've mentioned it before. It's hard to know if the problem lies in the actual tactical set or the descriptions provided to the player underneath.

I'm pretty sure that when it comes to tactics, it's within the blue ratings that are considered best for the tactic.

[redtiger7]

Originally Posted by Savoie45

I'm pretty sure that when it comes to tactics, it's within the blue ratings that are considered best for the tactic.

If that's the case, then there are a LOOOOT of players who are bad for any tactic.