|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| FHM10 - General Discussion Talk about the latest & greatest FHM, officially licensed by the NHL! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Sherbrooke, QC Canada
Posts: 64
|
QoL Suggestion - Sorting Players
Within the Team Roster section and more specifically for the Active Roster and Stats screens, adding the ability to filter your players by Lines( i.e. 1st Line - LW-C-RW-LD-RD, 2nd Line - LW-C etc.) would be a helpful addition to those screens Filter function.
Cheers! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,665
|
Yeah knowing info per line, instead of per player would be insanely helpful for identifying who and what to change - I don't think line data is tracked internally at this stage, which is probably why it's not in there. TobyinHR's tool last year went some way to helping with that but it just dealt with the line data from the CSV which is who was on each line at the moment of export. Ideally we'd need something like the lineup time tracker in draft day sports basketball games etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Sherbrooke, QC Canada
Posts: 64
|
A couple more QoL suggestions for the Filter function on the various Roster screens.
Would it be possible to make it the default starting option of having all the position boxes unchecked for the various player positions instead of having them all checked as is now the case? It is rather annoying and unnecessary to have uncheck 5 positions to narrow down one’s choice to a single position or at best two positions (if looking Defensemen or Wingers both sides for example). Rather it seems more practical to make the default choice unchecked and let the player pick / the position(s) they are interested in. Also, would it be possible to make the selector starting value for a players age, height and / or weight a more reasonable one rather than the 999 it now defaults to. Again, it is very annoying to have to arrow down from 999 to let’s say 26 if one is looking for a player at that particular maximum age. Why not start the maximum value at zero instead. Its highly unlikely one would need to go past 40 for a maximum age, and certainly noy likely one would need to go to 999. Additionally, for the weight & height filters, same basic issue, but also what are these values representing? Pounds or Kilograms, Inches or Centimeters? Cheers ! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|