OF sort

PSUColonel · 01-30-2011, 11:20 PM

on the sort player position pulldowns...OF should be added as well as LF,RF & CF

Sparrow · 01-31-2011, 11:20 AM

The argument against this has been that there are already too many fields and adding more (infielder would be it's corollary) would make it too crowded.

Additionally these are very easy to customize and make your own that is called OF and called IF.

Personally I agree with you because I always make these fields and wouldn't mind them as a default, but I get the argument that it adds clutter to for those who do not want more drop down options.

szathkey · 02-03-2011, 03:59 AM

In my opinion it is tough to customize as far as fielding is concerned. The fielding stats, when you sort people by position, are the stats for those players for that position only.

An OF filter would theoretically need to include all fielding statistics from the OF positions.

01-30-2011, 11:20 PM	#1
PSUColonel Hall Of Famer Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 13,148	OF sort on the sort player position pulldowns...OF should be added as well as LF,RF & CF

01-31-2011, 11:20 AM	#2
Sparrow All Star Reserve Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 803	The argument against this has been that there are already too many fields and adding more (infielder would be it's corollary) would make it too crowded. Additionally these are very easy to customize and make your own that is called OF and called IF. Personally I agree with you because I always make these fields and wouldn't mind them as a default, but I get the argument that it adds clutter to for those who do not want more drop down options.

02-03-2011, 03:59 AM	#3
szathkey Minors (Triple A) Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 201	In my opinion it is tough to customize as far as fielding is concerned. The fielding stats, when you sort people by position, are the stats for those players for that position only. An OF filter would theoretically need to include all fielding statistics from the OF positions.