Home | Webstore
Latest News: OOTP 27 Buy Now - FHM 12 Available - OOTP Go! 27 Available

Out of the Park Baseball 27 Buy Now!

  

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Out of the Park Baseball 25 > OOTP Dynasty Reports

OOTP Dynasty Reports Tell us about the OOTP dynasties you have built!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-19-2007, 04:02 PM   #1
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
Radical Baseball

INTRODUCTION
Remember the hullabaloo over radical realignment? Well, I started thinking about alignments, about the fact that teams are separate from each other and that with the expanded playoffs, we're not able to really discern the "best teams" in baseball.

So after thinking about it and doing some googling to see if other people were thinking what I'd been thinking about, I started a fictional universe in 1969 that's four divisions in one subleague of 24 teams total.

The top eight teams from the league (4 division champs and 4 wild cards) make the playoffs each year and play in the following rounds:

Quote:
WORLD SERIES QUARTER-FINALS (best-of-five)
WORLD SERIES SEMI-FINALS (best-of-seven)
WORLD SERIES (best-of-seven)
Sure, it sucks that a few more teams can't claim a mythical division title and convince their fans that they're making progress and it keeps out teams that play in weak divisions.

We expanded by four teams in 1980 and again by four in 1990. There are now 32 teams. 8 teams playing in four geographic divisions with the same playoff structure as before.

We have one level of minors, that I just added for the 2000 season.

To add a twist, in 1996, we added another major league -- but that doesn't play in MLB. This major league (Continental League) has 12 teams and for the past four years, they've just played their games (with a salary cap, less media revenue and a cheaper player salary structure) and their league champion receives the Shea Cup. (Named after NY Lawyer William Shea, who founded the original Continental League and who Shea Stadium is named after)

But in 2000, we've added a twist. At the end of the season, the winner of the Shea Cup will face off against the worst team in MLB in a best-of-five game series. The loser of the series goes to the Continental League, the winner goes to MLB. (or stays, if that's the case...)

The idea is to put an entire twist on teams that just tank because they don't want to spend money to win and it gives an incentive for you to play your best the whole year, especially with the salary cap and other constraints that Continental League teams have on them.

I'm going to lay out the league structure and the teams next.

Welcome to Radical Baseball.
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 04:44 PM   #2
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL ALIGNMENT (CURRENT AS OF 1991)

Quote:
EASTERN DIVISION
---
Boston Yankees
Brooklyn Cyclones
Cleveland Indians
New York Bombers (formerly the New York Nine)
New York Mets
Philadelphia Blue Jays
Pittsburgh Pirates
Toronto Blue Sox

CENTRAL DIVISION
---
Chicago Cubs
Chicago White Sox
Chicago Comets
Columbus Clippers
Detroit Tigers
Kansas City Royals
Minnesota Twins
St. Louis Cardinals

WESTERN DIVISION
---
Colorado Rockies
Los Angeles Dodgers
Los Angeles Angels
Phoenix Firebirds
San Diego Padres
San Francisco Giants
San Jose Captains
Seattle Mariners

SOUTHERN DIVISION
----
Atlanta Athletics
Cincinnati Reds
Florida Marlins
Houston Astros
Jacksonville Braves
San Antonio Aviators
Texas Rangers
Washington Nationals
CONTINENTAL LEAGUE
Quote:
EASTERN DIVISION
---
Orlando Manatees
Milwaukee Brewers
Baltimore Orioles
Durham Bulls
Hartford Red Sox
Philadelphia Phillies

WESTERN DIVISION
---
Boise Hawks
Los Angeles Empires
Portland Beavers
Monterrey Sultans
Salt Lake City Bees
Nevada Silverhawks

Last edited by darkcloud4579; 09-19-2007 at 05:25 PM.
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 04:55 PM   #3
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
RATIONALE/BACKGROUND
The main reason for things being how they are is simple. I wanted to be able to have a league that would let me go crazy with adding teams to cities that otherwise would never be in the majors, but when leagues start to get past 26 or 28 teams, it gets really crowded and it's hard to follow all of the action.

I didn't have a schedule for 30 teams that allowed for a single league structure, so I went with this one for that reason. If I get one, then there might be contraction in the future, meaning two teams will get demoted to the Continental League or maybe even three.

2000 is the first season of relegation/promotion in MLB. You might wonder why we allow players who play in the CL to count their CL stats as major league. It's simple. The only way to possibly conceive this type of setup in a real world context is to imagine the conditions it would take to do something like this in real life.

So I added more big city teams and basically you promise the losers in the bottom league that they're still technically 'major league' and that they have the chance to play with the big boys and collect on the big media rights check and all that goes with major league status from year to year.

But the rub is, the longer you hang out in the big league, is the more likely you are to collect a lot more money and a shot at the big prize by going to the playoffs, etc.

The most noticable thing about this change is that in the majority of my dynasties, there are an incessent amount of team moves and expansions. In this league, you just won't see any of that.

I mean, will teams move? Sure. Will stuff happen? Of course.

But the MLB won't get any bigger and it's much more likely to get smaller.
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 05:00 PM   #4
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
PAST WORLD SERIES CHAMPIONS (1969-PRESENT)
Quote:
---
1969: Boston Yankees
1970: Baltimore Orioles
1971: Kansas City Royals
1972: Milwaukee Braves
1973: Milwaukee Braves
1974: Pittsburgh Pirates
1975: Boston Yankees
1976: Boston Yankees
1977: St. Louis Cardinals
1978: Colorado Rockies
1979: San Diego Padres
1980: Houston Astros
1981: New York Mets
1982: Chicago White Sox
1983: San Antonio Aviators
1984: Chicago Cubs
1985: San Antonio Aviators
1986: San Antonio Aviators
1987: Washington Nationals
1988: St. Louis Cardinals
1989: San Antonio Aviators
1990: Chicago Cubs
1991: Chicago White Sox
1992: San Francisco Giants
1993: St. Louis Cardinals
1994: Washington Nationals
1995: San Antonio Aviators
1996: Toronto Blue Sox
1997: New York Mets
1998: New York Mets
1999: Seattle Mariners
SHEA CUP CHAMPIONS (1996-PRESENT)
Quote:
1996: Durham Bulls
1997: Portland Beavers
1998: Boise Hawks
1999: Orlando Manatees

Last edited by darkcloud4579; 09-19-2007 at 05:07 PM.
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 05:18 PM   #5
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
If you read my last dynasty, you know that I ended up with the Yankees in Boston. I grew very fond of that team, because I was pretty successful during my tenure there and just because the more I fell in love with the story, the more it appealed to me.

Well, just in random passing last night...I found an article that gave me some context for the story that I never knew. (The Yankees I originally moved never played in New York, nor have the ones in this dynasty)

The article, from a book about the Yankees and the article came from ESPN back in '02 or something.

Quote:
The Boston Yankees. Is that an oxymoron or what? But it almost happened.

Babe Ruth was sold to the New York Yankees in December 1919. Within months, the Yankees almost moved to Boston to play in Fenway Park, and Babe Ruth came this close to coming back to Beantown. As a Boston Yankee. That's right, Red Sox fans. That team in New York with 26 world championships could have been Boston's.
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 05:28 PM   #6
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
KEY RECORDHOLDERS (Records are only for MLB play, CL play has separate records, even though CL stats towards a player's final career numbers.)
---
Quote:
Kelly Bradley (1969) .401 BA
Jeff Thornton (1975) 57 HR
Rich Sorensen (1969) 185 RBI
Damian Salazar (1979) 120 SB

Rodrigo Bustamante (1972) 25 Wins

Bill Hill (1986) &
Nathan Brinkerhoff (1980) 25 Losses

Elliot Goode (1992) & Peter Davis (1984) 49 saves

Alfredo Gomes (1982) 1.062 ERA
(Gomes holds spots 1-12 on the single-season ERA list. He was good..)

Davy Benoit (1971) 314 strikeouts
CAREER RECORDS
Quote:
Benjamin Bowden (.349 career batting average)

Bob Little (4,232 career hits)

Mark Jewell (734 career home runs)

Jack Curry (2465 career RBI)

Alfredo Gomes (380 career wins)

Raymond Wilder (663 career saves)

Alfredo Gomes (1.91 career ERA)

Alfredo Gomes (5152 career strikeouts)
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 06:48 PM   #7
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
WELCOME TO THE BIG LEAGUES, KID
I'm D.C. Daly, the 20-something G.M. of the Boston Yankees. The Yanks are a once proud franchise that have fallen on hard times in recent years. They've got exactly one playoff appearance since 1976 and besides that, we've just been terrible.

A graduate of Washington University in St. Louis, I was an intern with the ballclub during my 2nd year of college and I came back to work for them after college was over.

Last year, the owners approached me about becoming G.M. I actually laughed and said, "do you know what you're doing?" I'm comfortable enough with them to do that.

They said yeah. That the team hadn't been getting anywhere with the old stiffs they'd been employing and that no number of retreads was going to improve things.

Well, I waited for the off-season to come and nothing happened.

I got announced G.M. on March 2nd, just three weeks before the regular season starts.

Needless to say, the cupboard is bare and morale is low. I'm not expecting to work any magic and there won't be any miracles or rabbits pulled out of a hat. But it would not be good to take my first G.M. job and end up getting relegated out of the league in my first (and possibly last) year in the gig, so...I'm going to do my best to try to cobble some parts together with what we have.

I'm using SkyDog's OOTP settings for this universe, the DH is on and the rotations are 5-man, despite my penchant for 4-man rotations. Our active roster is 27-man, September callups are for 40-players, but the reserve roster is 43-man

I also have low injuries on.

WHAT WE HAVE
SP Mike Love, 30
(23-7, 1.98, 290 K in 1999)

We just happen to have the reigning AL Cy Young award winner in tow. We went 87-75 last year, good enough for third place and only 1 game out of a playoff spot last year.

He's got three years left on a five-year deal he signed worth $39.3 million and I'm not letting him go anywhere.

Zach Mitchell, RF, 31 (.242, 26 HR, 65 RBI)

He won a Gold Glove in 1998 and was dealt here this past off-season from the Mets. My precedessor did that deal, not me. He's a good outfielder, though.

Juan Lopez, 1B, 37
He's got 377 career homers, but needless to say, he's on the last end of those. He hit .275 last year with 8 HRs and 65 RBI for us, his third full season with us.

Leo Gomez, CF, 33
Lefty hitter, hit .301 last year with 18 HR and 70 RBI. It was his sixth season with us.


---------------------
Like a few other guys, I won't deny that I'm looking at assessing what kind of value he might have and maybe pitch him off to the Continental League for prospects.

The skinny on our roster is that we're probably an injury or three away from being completely out of the race and in a different sort of race -- the race towards to the bottom of the standings.

So I think it's much more prudent to rebuild the roster from scratch, rather than try to acquire some spare parts to get to the playoffs, only to get bounced out in the first round or something.

Fans haven't seen a winner here in some time anyway, so..it's not like their expectations should be that high.

In terms of prospects, we have a few guys who might be promising down the line, but no one whose almost ready to go:
Quote:
SP Monfre Lourinho, 18, (Potential: 41/75/61)

MR Eric Alford, 21, LHP (Potential: 41/60/50)

CL Mark Sharp, 18, (Potential: 64/87/61)

2B Jeff Mavor, 18, (Potential: 82/47/60/58/67)

Last edited by darkcloud4579; 09-19-2007 at 07:07 PM.
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 07:03 PM   #8
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
MY FIRST DEAL
----
With less than a few weeks before the regular season starts, I wanted to see if I couldn't pull the trigger on something to at least get the ball rolling.

I've instituted a house rule that won't allow me to make more than one trade a month after the pre-season begins. Meaning between the end of the regular season and then I can go crazy...if I want. I won't, tho.

Anyway, before I got started I'd seen a kid who was a stud in the Continental League and had yet to make his major league debut.

He's Canadian, so he opted not to enter the draft and instead signed with Portland (CL) out of high school and MLB teams actually like this loophole because it allows them to assess talent on a stage that they'll know the kids will eventually play at and if they can't hack it after a few years in the CL, then they can save themselves money invested in a kid that doesn't make it worth their while.

Anyway, M.A. Charbonneau, (Marc-Alexandre, but this isn't hockey. That name is too damn long) played four years in Portland and has hit 152 HRs, 402 RBI and hit .293 over that span. At just 24, I figure he's just the kind of player we'd like to anchor in our outfield for a while.

Do I worry if he'll have adjustment problems in MLB? I sure do. But it's worth it to me to take the risk, rather than try to find someone like him in the draft or to sign him to a big free agent deal and THEN learn he can't play.

27-year old first baseman Alfredo Longoria is a career .301 hitter in four years of Continental League play. He's also hit 98 HRs and 394 RBI.

Along with those guys, I acquired prospect SP Mauro Gonzalez (POTENTIAL: 48/68/69) and two relievers.

I sent Portland 23-year old starting pitcher Bill Tate, who went 16-12 last year with 159 K in 35 starts. His ERA was 3.52. He might be a steep price to pay if he ends up being good someday, but...I just didn't think it was worth sitting on him with his numbers being how they are. To me, last year was him playing out of his head.

Juan Lopez, I mentioned earlier. He's 37. I don't need to asy anymore than that. He needed to go sooner or later and now is as good as ever.

C Kyle King was a backup catcher who became the starter last year. He hit .232 with 16 HR and 57 RBI for us in his first full season as the starter.

Earl Hamilton is 18 years old and he might be a decent player someday, but it wasn't going to happen for a while and I preferred not to wait. (POTENTIALS: 63/45/32/48/87)

We sent two other minor leaguers and $7 million in cash to Portland in this deal.

In total, we ended up costing ourselves about $530k with the salary swaps and stuff.

Even deal, I think. And the last one before the season starts for us, as well as the first.

Quote:
Friday, March 3rd, 2000: Yankees Trade Tate to Beavers for Charbonneau
The Boston Yankees have finalized a deal with the Portland Beavers for the services of 19-year old starting pitcher Mauro González, 24-year old left fielder M.A. Charbonneau, 27-year old first baseman Alfredo Longoria, 29-year old reliever Joey Fullerton and 22-year old reliever Lau-po Hsu. In exchange, the Beavers will receive 30-year old first baseman Tony Aquino, 25-year old first baseman Jim Clark, 37-year old first baseman Juan López, 18-year old left fielder Earl Hamilton, 30-year old catcher Kyle King, 23-year old starting pitcher Bill Tate and $7,000,000 in cash.

In his career Tate has amassed 35 wins and 39 losses over 105 appearances. He has an ERA of 4.55 and 432 strikeouts in pitching 649.1 innings.

Last edited by darkcloud4579; 09-19-2007 at 07:04 PM.
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 03:20 PM   #9
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
Here are the standings as of July 1, 2000.

Remember, the four teams with the best records besides the division champions make the playoffs, along with the four division champs.


Code:
Eastern Division	W	L	PCT	GB
Pittsburgh Pirates	61	28	.685	-
Philadelphia Blue Jays	56	33	.629	5.0
Toronto Blue Sox	54	34	.614	6.5
New York Mets		47	42	.528	14.0
Cleveland Indians	44	46	.489	17.5
New York Bombers	38	51	.427	23.0
Brooklyn Cyclones	36	53	.404	25.0
Boston Yankees		34	55	.382	27.0

Central Division	W	L	PCT	GB
St. Louis Cardinals	55	34	.618	-
Chicago Cubs		53	36	.596	2.0
Kansas City Royals	49	40	.551	6.0
Columbus Clippers	47	42	.528	8.0
Detroit Tigers		47	42	.528	8.0
Chicago Comets		41	48	.461	14.0
Minnesota Twins		36	53	.404	19.0
Chicago White Sox	23	66	.258	32.0

Western Division	W	L	PCT	GB
Los Angeles Dodgers	52	37	.584	-
San Jose Captains	51	38	.573	1.0
Colorado Rockies	45	43	.511	6.5
Seattle Mariners	45	44	.506	7.0
Los Angeles Angels	44	45	.494	8.0
Phoenix Firebirds	41	48	.461	11.0
San Francisco Giants	40	49	.449	12.0
San Diego Padres	31	57	.352	20.5

Southern Division	W	L	PCT	GB
Texas Rangers		56	32	.636	-
Atlanta Athletics	55	33	.625	1.0
Houston Astros		45	44	.506	11.5
Cincinnati Reds		42	46	.477	14.0
San Antonio Aviators	41	47	.466	15.0
Washington Nationals	40	48	.455	16.0
Florida Marlins		37	52	.416	19.5
Jacksonville Braves	34	54	.386	22.0
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 03:45 PM   #10
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
BATTING STATS
(As of July 1, 2000)
Code:
Name			G	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	TB	BB	K	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS
Alfredo Longoria 1B	91	373	56	116	12	2	15	49	177	28	51	0	0	.311	.365	.475	.840
Leonardo Gómez CF	88	358	55	95	24	4	11	41	160	24	27	10	2	.265	.315	.447	.762
M.A. Charbonneau LF	87	329	44	95	10	2	16	55	157	44	56	1	1	.289	.381	.477	.858
Jake Walters C		90	325	25	73	14	1	3	34	98	23	64	0	0	.225	.279	.302	.581
Bob Parsons 2B		86	313	38	75	8	1	2	32	91	35	57	5	6	.240	.331	.291	.621
Domenic Guiney C	83	301	25	71	22	6	1	34	108	13	68	0	0	.236	.271	.359	.630
Zach Mitchell RF	60	230	33	50	2	1	18	42	108	21	43	7	1	.217	.282	.470	.751
Christian Robertson SS	51	206	22	49	13	3	2	16	74	23	13	8	5	.238	.323	.359	.682
Andrew Leonard CF	49	194	15	47	7	2	0	8	58	12	42	5	1	.242	.284	.299	.583
Iván Alicea LF		39	164	23	36	6	1	7	17	65	16	30	7	3	.220	.316	.396	.712
Wayne Turner 2B		41	160	24	41	5	1	4	18	60	7	33	3	3	.256	.300	.375	.675
Andrew Cooper 1B	30	116	22	35	3	1	5	13	55	13	26	0	0	.302	.366	.474	.841
Lee Meyers LF		28	73	5	17	4	0	1	8	24	4	20	0	0	.233	.282	.329	.611
Stephen Wallace 2B	8	29	0	8	0	0	0	3	8	1	6	1	1	.276	.300	.276	.576
Jason Gaines LF		6	25	0	7	1	0	0	3	8	2	4	0	0	.280	.333	.320	.653
Chris Harrison CF	13	22	0	4	0	0	0	0	4	0	6	0	0	.182	.182	.182	.364
Jeff Mavor 2B		9	21	2	3	0	0	2	3	9	0	7	0	0	.143	.143	.429	.571
Michael Love SP		1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	.000	.000	.000	.000
PITCHING STATS
(As of July 1, 2000)
Code:
Name			W	L	SV	ERA	G	GS	IP	HA	R	ER	HR	BB	K	WHIP	OAVG	BABIP
Michael Love SP		7	7	0	2.77	19	19	143.0	129	52	44	2	51	143	1.26	.236	.317
Jorge Santollo MR	2	0	0	3.41	22	0	34.1	39	16	13	2	12	12	1.49	.295	.314
Burt Ablett MR		0	1	1	3.63	24	0	34.2	36	14	14	2	13	21	1.41	.267	.304
Joey Fullerton MR	3	2	2	3.66	28	0	32.0	30	21	13	3	17	25	1.47	.252	.297
Mauro González SP	0	0	0	3.86	2	0	2.1	3	1	1	0	3	1	2.57	.333	.375
Manuel Silva CL		5	5	10	4.10	21	1	26.1	22	13	12	1	8	20	1.14	.227	.276
Diego Cruz MR		3	3	4	4.10	23	0	26.1	34	14	12	4	12	11	1.75	.318	.326
Jesús Saucedo SP	2	5	0	4.73	13	13	70.1	74	40	37	5	47	31	1.72	.271	.291
Lau-po Hsu MR		3	1	1	4.85	37	0	52.0	60	35	28	3	21	20	1.56	.287	.306
Curt Taylor MR		0	0	0	5.11	9	0	12.1	13	7	7	1	6	4	1.54	.271	.279
Jeffrey MacGregor SP	5	12	0	5.23	19	19	117.0	151	75	68	11	37	61	1.61	.314	.342
Darby Mills SP		2	7	0	5.32	17	17	86.1	90	53	51	9	48	76	1.60	.269	.324
Bobby Rogers SP		2	4	0	5.65	15	15	79.2	88	51	50	9	48	48	1.71	.275	.300
Jorge Serrano MR	0	1	0	7.07	7	0	14.0	19	14	11	3	6	2	1.79	.306	.281
Eric Williams SP	0	6	0	7.34	6	6	38.0	60	38	31	7	18	12	2.05	.361	.361
Jeremy Thompson MR	1	0	0	7.99	10	0	23.2	33	22	21	2	15	13	2.03	.344	.383
Eric Alford MR		0	1	0	8.80	8	0	15.1	17	19	15	4	16	11	2.15	.274	.277
Carlos Díaz SP		0	2	0	10.03	2	2	11.2	19	13	13	2	5	5	2.06	.380	.395
Bob Dufrene MR		0	0	0	16.21	2	0	1.2	1	3	3	1	2	2	1.80	.167	.000
Ricardo Gutiérrez SP	0	1	0	38.58	2	1	2.1	8	10	10	0	8	0	6.86	.615	.615
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 03:46 PM   #11
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
We're half through year one and while the team isn't very good, we're good enough that I don't think we'll be a candidate to play in the dreadful "MLB Challenge Series" which is the name of that one series that we want nothing to do with.

We've got some recognizable faces now that I'd like to hold on to and spend some time building an actual core for the ballclub.

That said, as the deadline quickly approaches, I'm not going to be gunshy about seeing what the market will bare for Michael Love. He's 30 years old and coming off a Cy Young season. He's won 20 games twice in the past four years and I think he'd be a commodity. I'd love to keep him, don't get me wrong, but I think he's the kind of player that could help us get other guys that can do more for us this year and down the line. So I'm going to explore that as my one deal going towards the deadline.
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 07:13 PM   #12
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
Ok, so I'm mulling over two deals here. Which should I take?

We have a slight weakness at chater, a weakness at second base, a weakness at third base, a weakness in right fied, a slight weakness in the rotation and a weakness in the bullpen.

Our farm system is rated #3 currently and I'll profile those kids later, but among them they are a 2nd baseman, a left fielder, two pitchers and a 1st baseman are our 'top' prospects.

I'd send Michael Love (SP), Alfredo Longoria (1B) and Diego Cruz (MR) to the Mets for:
Quote:
19-year old OF Jacob Snow (potentials: 87/100/88/67/95)

18-year old SP Ralph Oliver (pot: 57/56/76)

20-year old 1B Randy Francis (pot: 58/81/90/30/35)

18-year old 3B Ken Davis (47/85/53/48/37)
So of them, I'm most excited about Snow (who was the one they offered me in a straight deal for Love, I negotiated the rest of the deal on my own) and I think Oliver might be a solid middle of the rotation guy. The rest of them I'm afraid might flop, but at this point...who knows?

But anyway. Here is the other deal on the table. It's with San Jose.

I'd deal Love and Longoria for:

Quote:
20-year old 1B Tim Lee (pot: 79/87/49/87/81)

19-year old OF Billy Krause (pot: 46/66/64/44/51)

22-year old 3B Jared McCoy (pot: 45/78/61/60/30)
Lee and McCoy are on the major league roster already for San Jose, so the difference on paper in the two deals is that the kids from San Jose are more "ready", but I think the potential in the New York is worth pulling the trigger on.

I might see what else I can do, even possibly packaging the two in separate deals to maximize what we can get.
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 12:54 AM   #13
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
July 7, 2000
Okay, so I've decided for sure that we're going to pull the trigger on these deals before the end of next week. I'd just like to "beat the rush" so to speak of teams doing deals and while standing pat might get us someone who is desperate to make a deal, I'd just rather know what I'm dealing with.

The most recent offer to the Mets goes like this:

SP Michael Love, SP Eric Williams and MR Diego Cruz to New York for RF Jacob Snow (.254/2 HR/6 RBI in 71 ABs this year), Ralph Oliver (10-5, 1.66 ERA in Double-A) and 29-year old starter Tony Cruz (8-6, 2.88 ERA with 87 K in 20 starts this year)

I like the balance on this deal, because it gives us a player that can help us now (Cruz), as well as adding that prospect component that I wanted in the first place.

7/7/2000
8:54PM
I made the Mets add one more prospect, a throwaway kid named Dorian Genovelis (POT: 41/30/88) who hails from Greece of all places.

Anyway...with that, I accepted the deal today. We save about $2.4 million with that trade. Not bad, I don't think.

7/12/2000
10:26PM

I talked to the Royals, who hadn't called me until earlier today, trying to see if they could get into the Longoria sweepstakes. They are 5 1/2 games out of the last Wild Card spot, I guess they think they can make a push.

The offer to me surpasses what Philadelphia was offering earlier today and no one else has called me tonight. So I agree to the deal and we say we'll announce it offically in the morning.

It would send Alfredo Longoria and catcher Domenic Guiney to Kansas City for four players:

Quote:
33-year old reliever Trey Parker (5-0, 1 SV, 4.45 ERA in 34 appearances)

19-year old catcher Quentin Atkins (pot: 58/96/77/61/44)

22-year old pitcher Mark Johnston (pot: 53/55/52)

18-year old first baseman Brian Green (pot: 49/66/66/53/25)

The key in this particular deal is Atkins. He's a catcher, they're hard to come by.
7/13/2000
7:15AM

I get a call on my cell phone. I'm just sitting at the table, eating a bowl of oatmeal and the other line sounds like no one is there. Just as I get ready to hang up, I hear...

"D.C.?"

"Yeah?"

"You still want to deal Longoria?"

"Who is this?"

"Dan Childs, Philadelphia Blue Jays."

"Oh, hey. You know, I didn't expect you to.."

"I know, I know. I didn't get back to you, because I had to think about your offer a bit. I know you're probably getting hit up bad. And you probably want him off your hands so your guys can --"

"Yeah, man. I'm actually considering keeping him. I don't know. The owners are kinda waffling..."

"What? No. You can't do that. Look I, think I have a deal that we can make work. We haven't been to the playoffs since '82. I'm getting slammed in the press because someone leaked a story that we failed to get a deal done and that the current club is gonna blow it down the stretch. I can't have that happen man. This deal will bail me out big if the fans think we're trying. I mean, the Phillies down in the CL are gaining ground on us. Which is ****ing ******ed if you ask me, all of this major/minor league bull****."

"Alright man. Let's cut to the chase. Whose on the table?"

"Ok, I've got it here."

::reads me the list::

"Wow, you really want to pull the trigger, eh?

"Look man. If we do this now, I can hit the media up for a press conference at 2pm this afternoon. We need this to work out. What do you say?"

"You've got a deal. You've got a deal, my friend."

"Sounds good."


7/12/2000
3:17PM


Needless to say, the guy in Kansas City wasn't happy with me. The last thing you want to do is back out on a handshake deal. But even he had to admit when I told him of what Philly was giving up, he said "well man, there's no way we're matching that."

And if he hadn't called me just before I'd gone to the office this morning, the deal never would've happened. But the sneak attack in this case worked out for us perfectly.

In the deal with Philadelphia that we actually did, we traded Alfredo Longoria, SS Christian Robertson, C Domenic Guiney and outfielder Leonardo Gomez to Philadelphia for:

Quote:
P Cole Fullerton, 24-year old righthander. (2-2 with a 4.38 ERA in 8 appearances with Philadelphia, went 2-2 with a 3.40 ERA in 27 apperances with Jacksonville earlier this year)

SS George Anderson, 20-year old left-handed hitter. Hitting .291 this year with 1 HR and 30 RBI in 333 ABs.

P Carlos Macias (2-2, with 11 SV and 5.40 ERA in 30 appearances)

2B Michael Warren (pot: 79/89/79/68/72)

and two minor leaguers.
With this done and out of the way, I can focus my attention properly on the amateur draft which takes place on the 15th of July.
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 11:58 AM   #14
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
2000 AMATEUR DRAFT SELECTIONS

Quote:
1 (20): Derek Dowd, 17 year old centerfielder from Montreal. Has great defensive instincts, gap power potential and solid contact and eye/discipline potential. Should be solid on the basepaths, too.

2nd round: Carlos Clifton
17-year old pitcher from San Antonio. Projects as a top of the rotation starter with good potentials in stuff, movement and control.

3rd round: Vin Reilly, 17-year old shortstop from Australia. Tall, athletic player with good speed potential and power numbers. Should get to the majors on his defense.

4th round: Luis Beltre
17-year old left-handed pitcher from Puerto Rico. Doesn't have great control, but excellent stuff and movement. Could project as a middle reliever.

5th round: Felipe Vargas, 17-year old left fielder from New York. Power hitter and average defender.
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 12:39 PM   #15
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
CHALLENGE SERIES STANDINGS
---
Chicago White Sox
36-79

San Diego Padres
42-72 5 GA

Jacksonville Braves
45-68 8 GA

Boston Yankees
45-68 8 GA

With just over six weeks left in the regular season, we sit at 45-68. We're obviously not in the divisional or wild card race, but we're also seemingly safe from the Challenge Series race, too.

We currently sit 8 games ahead of Chicago for the worst record in MLB. So long as we don't run into any long slumps in August, we should be safe heading into September.

BRAVES SOLD, WILL MOVE TO RICHMOND IN 2001
The Jacksonville Braves have not announced a move yet, but all indications point to the team heading north to Richmond, Virginia for the 2001 season. The team plays in aging the Jacksonville Baseball Grounds since moving to the city in 1990 after Memphis officials condemed Rogers Field, the antiquated park the team had been playing in city moving from Milwaukee in 1980.

Braves officials say that the seemingly "every decade moving thing, has to get old" for fans of the organization, but they are "committed" to putting a winner on the field and that they will explore "every avenue in which to do that."
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 12:47 PM   #16
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
September 1, 2000
---
MLB TO BRAVES OWNERS: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

NEW YORK -- Major League Baseball's owners met last week and issued a stern warning to the owners of the Jacksonville Braves. "We're tired of your antics."

Despite the fact that the team's current ownership have only had the team for the past four years, MLB has stated that it's tired of the perceived instability that the franchise has brought onto the league.

"Fans deserve to know where their team will play," said one owner who sought to remain anonymous.

"We've had enough of it and I don't doubt that my colleagues will stand for it much longer."

That led to rumors that MLB would banish the ballclub out of the majors for next season, either as a demotion to the Continental League or a solution never before employed by MLB in the modern era -- contraction.

"That would be a drastic step," said NBC baseball analyst Bob Costas. "But I can understand the reason they want to do it. Baseball's never had a team do something quite like this before. Four cities in less than thirty years? That's just unacceptable."

The Continental League is owned by major league baseball and so, it's not certain that MLB owners will allow the team to transfer to a new city and move to a different league, while promoting two teams from the Continental League seems not to be an option they want to employ.

"Consider that the Challenge Series itself a whole new concept for MLB. They don't want to muck it up or confuse people in the first year of it," said Costas.

No comments were available from the Braves organization or anyone from MLB, but with three weeks to go in the season, few expect this is the last we've heard of this situation.
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 12:53 PM   #17
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
Standings as of September 4, 2000

In the race for the eighth and final playoff spot, there are
a bevy of teams jockeying for position. The Mets are 1.5 games out,
while the Firebirds are 3 GB. Kansas City, Philadelphia and Toronto are all
3 1/2 games out and Detroit has a sliver of hope at 5 games back.

Meanwhile, in the challenge series standings, the White Sox (54-91) are gaining ground while the New York Bombers (57-88) have free fallen to
close within 3 games of the Sox for baseball's worst record.
The Padres are 4 games ahead with the season ending on the 21st of September.

Code:
Eastern Division	W	L	PCT	GB
Pittsburgh Pirates	96	50	.658	-
New York Mets		80	65	.552	15.5
Philadelphia Blue Jays	78	67	.538	17.5
Toronto Blue Sox	78	67	.538	17.5
Brooklyn Cyclones	68	76	.472	27.0
Cleveland Indians	68	78	.466	28.0
Boston Yankees		60	84	.417	35.0
New York Bombers	57	88	.393	38.5

Central Division	W	L	PCT	GB
Chicago Cubs		83	62	.572	-
St. Louis Cardinals	82	63	.566	1.0
Columbus Clippers	82	64	.562	1.5
Kansas City Royals	79	68	.537	5.0
Detroit Tigers		76	69	.524	7.0
Chicago Comets		70	74	.486	12.5
Minnesota Twins		58	87	.400	25.0
Chicago White Sox	54	91	.372	29.0

Western Division	W	L	PCT	GB
Los Angeles Dodgers	95	50	.655	-
San Jose Captains	84	61	.579	11.0
Phoenix Firebirds	79	67	.541	16.5
Los Angeles Angels	70	75	.483	25.0
Colorado Rockies	68	76	.472	26.5
Seattle Mariners	65	79	.451	29.5
San Francisco Giants	63	83	.432	32.5
San Diego Padres	58	86	.403	36.5

Southern Division	W	L	PCT	GB
Texas Rangers		94	52	.644	-
Atlanta Athletics	90	54	.625	3.0
Houston Astros		73	73	.500	21.0
Florida Marlins		64	82	.438	30.0
San Antonio Aviators	63	82	.434	30.5
Washington Diplomats	63	82	.434	30.5
Cincinnati Reds		62	83	.428	31.5
Jacksonville Braves	61	83	.424	32.0
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 01:11 PM   #18
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
2000 SHEA CUP CHAMPIONSHIP (BEST-OF-FIVE)


This year's Continental League championship carries a weight that no previous year ever has before. The winner of the Shea Cup will face off against the worst team in MLB to determine whether that team will be demoted or will remain in MLB another year. The Chicago White Sox (62-100) are the team that have that distinction, but they get rest while the two teams in the CL duke it out over five games.

The Philadelphia Phillies of the Eastern Division (77-59) will play the Salt Lake City Bees (76-60) in the 2000 edition of the Shea Cup. Neither team has ever won the title before.
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 01:30 PM   #19
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
MLB CHALLENGE SERIES 2000
---
CHICAGO (62-100) v.
SALT LAKE CITY (SHEA CUP CHAMPS)

---
The first Challenge Series
in MLB history is here.

The setup is like this. The teams will play a doubleheader in Salt Lake City.

Then they get an off-day.

Then they play a double-header in Chicago if necessary.

If a Game 5 is needed, it'll take place the next day in Salt Lake City.


TALE OF THE TAPE:
--
The White Sox have a payroll of $38.3 million, good for 25th in MLB. The two highest paid players on the White Sox roster make more money than the entire Bees roster combined.

Standout players include 26-year old rightfielder Arthur Berry (.248/29 HR/80 RBI), second baseman Ricardo Beltran (.271/21/100) and 23-year old closer Fred Barker (6-5, 32 sv)

The Salt Lake City Bees have a payroll of $14.3 million, good for 10th in the Continental League, which has a $30 million salary cap.

The 2000 Shea Cup Champions are led by 20-game winner, 27-year old Jesus DeVargas (20-9, 3.86 ERA, 104 K), 26-year old closer Ronald Fuller (3-2, 33 SV, 3.60 ERA). On the offensive side, the team's captain is 36-year old outfielder Robert Harris who hit 29 HR and 111 RBI and batted .312 in his first year with the Bees and in the CL. Rookie first baseman Dan Warren, hit .320 with 18 HR and 97 RBI and was also a key part of the team's success this year.

Quote:
GAME 1:
SALT LAKE CITY 4, CHICAGO 2

The Bees are just 2 games away from making it to MLB.

GAME 2: SALT LAKE CITY 8, CHICAGO 5

Home cooking was the story of the day, as the Bees won two straight to head to Chicago needing only a win to advance to the Majors next season.

GAME 3: CHICAGO 2, SALT LAKE CITY 1

The White Sox stave off elimination for at least one more game, winning 2-1 at home.

GAME 4: SALT LAKE CITY 11, CHICAGO 0

The Bees were clearly the better team and as a result, Salt Lake City wins the first ever MLB Challenge Series!
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 01:33 PM   #20
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,712
Having never actually seen a CL team and an MLB face off against each other, I wasn't sure how likely it would be that one could win three games against an MLB team after having already played a post-season series prior to that, when the other team had at least a week off to rest.

But I guess my theory that the teams at the CL level are indeed major league is correct. As far as stats are concerned, I manually scheduled the Challenge Series games and scheduled them as "playoff" games. I know that might seem weird for the teams in the majors who had the worst record to get credit for playoff stats when they were in a relegation fight for their lives, but..I didn't consider the games "exhibitions" and they're not regular season, so, I thought scheduling them as post-season games was the only way to go.

Besides, I can't think of too many current major leaguers who would WANT those sort of stats. I mean, that's a lot of pressure to be put into, because anything can go wrong in a short series. The reason it's just a best-of-five and scheduled the way it is, is because I'd prefer it not to take away from the other playoff games that are really going on.
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 AM.

 

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com.

Officially Licensed Product – MLB Players, Inc.

Out of the Park Baseball is a registered trademark of Out of the Park Developments GmbH & Co. KG

Google Play is a trademark of Google Inc.

Apple, iPhone, iPod touch and iPad are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.

COPYRIGHT © 2023 OUT OF THE PARK DEVELOPMENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2024 Out of the Park Developments