|
||||
| ||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: College Park, Md.
Posts: 5,024
|
Historical League Fans
Which time period would you most like to see from a new league?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,660
|
1900-1920's
__________________
PT21 ![]() ![]() PT22 ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: East of East
Posts: 3,020
|
I like all the options...
__________________
History isn't really about the past - settling old scores. It's about defining the present and who we are." |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: College Park, Md.
Posts: 5,024
|
Quote:
__________________
OTBA: Washington Filibusters CLBR: Minnesota Twins 2005 Winner of LL's Pick the Loser Contest! - 15-0 Last edited by rem; 02-24-2006 at 12:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 143
|
'45-'49..since it's the earliest option =) hehe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NorthCarolina
Posts: 333
|
65-70 Please. Actually 75-80 is best.
__________________
Regards:John Nellis Last edited by JoeRockHead; 02-24-2006 at 05:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 2,434
|
none of the above.
__________________
Roll out the barrel! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: College Park, Md.
Posts: 5,024
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,660
|
Quote:
__________________
PT21 ![]() ![]() PT22 ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Union City, TN
Posts: 6,383
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Watford
Posts: 903
|
All of the above.
__________________
Talkin' 'bout the issues but keepin' it funky!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: 100% pure adrenaline!
Posts: 5,624
|
I had a lot of fun in a 70's league once. Statistically, it is my favorite decade.
__________________
Excess ain't rebellion. You're drinking what they're selling. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 3,411
|
I picked 45-49 because I'm a fan of old historical leagues. I prefer to start in 1901 and go from there but like a few others said 45-49 is the earliest option, so that's why I selected it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,660
|
hear hear. There isn't a lot of historical leagues....well compared to the rest of the other types out there.
Will this be using historical teams/players/everything, just the teams, or jsut the era?
__________________
PT21 ![]() ![]() PT22 ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NorthCarolina
Posts: 333
|
I'll take the Yanks(or Tigers) in any era!
__________________
Regards:John Nellis Last edited by JoeRockHead; 02-26-2006 at 05:24 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Laundry Barn Favorite food: Bran flakes.
Posts: 1,283
|
Meh, I like early 1900's better than all of them. Earliest is best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 225
|
I too, although not looking to join another league, if there were a league starting in 1901, would have to think hard about joining. I"ve always wanted to replay baseball history.
__________________
Legend Killer HOFFBL Cubs Original GM HOFFBL Rockies Original GM |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 154
|
2000
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|