|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| Earlier versions of OOTP: General Discussions General chat about the game... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Frankfort, Kentucky
Posts: 3,746
|
Babe Ruth tops 100 HR, everyone else normal
I'm importing the 1920 season and doing a multi-season sim. The default era settings are a mystery to me. The homers are about right for all the rest of baseball, but Ruth is cranking BA of .456 and HR over 100.
When I adjust the settings to bring him back to earth, the numbers are way too low for everyone else. Ruth's ratings are 88 at contact and 100 in power. Any suggestions? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,827
|
Re-run the season (or half the season) a number of times to see if Ruth's totals were an anomaly or routine. If routine, edit his ratings downward and re-test. Seems like a pain to have to do, but I don't see a workaround if you want realistic stats and you're not getting them.
__________________
"Read books, get brain." |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Frankfort, Kentucky
Posts: 3,746
|
Just wondering if anyone else has seen such striking disparity when using the default settings during that era.
I've replayed several times and finally had to make major changes to hits, HR, BB, SO. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 378
|
Yes, that is normal for Ruth. I experienced that also. His performance in 1919-1921 was so far above the norm that he completely dominates historical sims. With the league settings basically determining how many home runs the league will have coupled with Ruth's power dominance, he ends up getting a very large share.
Historically that was true also. In 1920, Ruth hit more home runs than any other AL team! He hit more HRs than 7 of the 8 NL teams too! Ruth was 1714% above the league average in HRs. That is the highest of all time. In fact, he holds the top-6 marks as shown below (from Sinins' Sabermetric Baseball Encyclopedia) HTML Code:
HOMERUNS YEAR RATE PLAYER LEAGUE 1 Babe Ruth 1920 1714 54 3 2 Babe Ruth 1919 1188 29 2 3 Babe Ruth 1921 1081 59 5 4 Babe Ruth 1927 1066 60 6 5 Babe Ruth 1918 1036 11 1 6 Babe Ruth 1926 978 47 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Frankfort, Kentucky
Posts: 3,746
|
Arod23, you may have hit on something else. When setting up the league, starting with the 1920 import, I chose to have ratings based on the remaining career. Perhaps I should have set this to be based on his whole career and that might smooth it out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 378
|
That will help some but there will still be a huge difference in ratings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: In a house in Saint Cloud, Florida.
Posts: 7,085
|
Interesting. I started a sim of fake players in 1901. I am up to 1942 now, but during the roaring 20's, there was one guy that was hitting homeruns galore. Well, he topped out at 52 and hit 450 over his career. Which was about normal, but he was WAY above everyone else each year. He would have 42, and the nearest guy would have 22. I called him the Babe Ruth of my league.
Those historical stats.. I can't figure em out... I like the stats I am producing now, with HR leaders usually in the 40s, averages around .360 for the leader, with an occasional guy battling to reach .400. But on the downside, doubles are too high and pitchers ERA are high. It is so confusing. OK, I increase the double numbers and I have decreased doubles, but will averages be decreased? Do those doubles turn into outs or hits. K's and walks... why are those two numbers so far apart? Balls hit into play?? What does that do?
__________________
Like BLUES? Visit www.smokestacklightnin.com, you will LOVE it! New show every Monday!! New Blues HOF![/COLOR][/FONT]
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 378
|
I agree, it is very confusing. Do a search on league settings, there are many posts with good advice. But, ultimately, you will likely have to run test sims to get the settings to where you want to be. Once I have my league set up, I copy the directory and run test sims (replay mode) until I get the final totals where I like them. Usually trying to closely match previous seasons. Then use those settings in the original file.
I was hoping that this would be changed in 6.5 or 7.0. It would be great to put in the league stats you desire and have the sim work from them rather than the non-intuitive, micro-tweaking that is required now. I realize that it is not a simple change to the code, but it would be nice. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Frankfort, Kentucky
Posts: 3,746
|
After several test sims, I've arrived at these settings that are getting me decent results. I also found Arod's advice to be the most helpful. Babe Ruth is so out of whack in comparison to the league in the early 1920s, that I start the import in 1925 and use these ERA settings:
87246 AB 25,000 H 5090 2B 855 3B 990 HR 12000 BB 404 hbp 6400 so .287 avg Oh, yes, and I added one tweak to the player development: +50 percent for pitcher stuff. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Member #3409
Posts: 8,350
|
In the historical replays I have done, I have never had a dominant Ruth. The last one was really weird. At the age of 40, Ruth led the American League in steals!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 378
|
Quote:
Ankit's CareerAvg DB takes care of that problem because players import in the first year of significant play rather than their first year when they typically have few ABs or IPs. This gives more realistic ratings, not to mention the career average feature improves historical sims because talent ratings are more accurate. OOTP doesn't import pitcher/hitters well, so Ankit's DB also splits Ruth into Babe the hitter and George the pitcher. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Member #3409
Posts: 8,350
|
Quote:
I've just never had good luck on the development of Ruth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Member #3409
Posts: 8,350
|
And oddly, the most Babe-like Ruth I ever had was in OOTP4 with an import from an unmodified Lahman's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wherever My VPN says
Posts: 1,989
|
Quote:
To give you suggestions, go to League setup and click to show ratings over 100. The 100 in power could very well have been over 100 which is what it is when you import Ruth for 1927 (133 to be exact) using the Lahman database. Second, don't edit the league totals if you are getting good numbers for the rest of the league. Just edit Ruth's power down into the 90's with his talent power being around 133 to allow for more growth. If you are in manager mode and can't edit, their is a utility you can download that will turn off manager mode and let you edit anything. Good luck.
__________________
Owner/Operator - Vezna Financial Services - Accounting and taxes. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|