Catchers passed ball rating

RchW · 11-19-2004, 05:07 PM

I know this is a dumb question but what value is better in the "passed ball" rating for catchers. Low number or high number.

For many simulated years I have assumed low is better now I'm not sure?

disposableheros · 11-19-2004, 05:12 PM

yes, the lower the better

RchW · 11-19-2004, 05:27 PM

Thanks, that is what I thought, but I saw Pudge Rodrigues with a PB of 8 and then I was not so sure.

Jonzard · 11-22-2004, 06:46 PM

Well, if its your oppenents catcher.... higher is better

11-19-2004, 05:07 PM	#1
RchW Hall Of Famer Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Toronto ON by way of Glasgow UK Posts: 15,629	Catchers passed ball rating I know this is a dumb question but what value is better in the "passed ball" rating for catchers. Low number or high number. For many simulated years I have assumed low is better now I'm not sure?

11-19-2004, 05:12 PM	#2
disposableheros Hall Of Famer Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 4,332	yes, the lower the better __________________ 2 Wild Cards, 11 Division Champs, 4 League Champs, 3 World Champs, and 3 Best GM awards Baseball Maelstrom - New York Mets - 180-149 .547 Corporate League Baseball - Coke Buzz - 889-649 .578 Western Hemisphere Baseball League - Santiago Saints - 672-793 .459 Record - 2428-2271 .517

11-22-2004, 06:46 PM	#4
Jonzard Hall Of Famer Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Minnesota Posts: 3,647	Well, if its your oppenents catcher.... higher is better __________________ For a scientist must indeed be freely imaginative and yet skeptical, creative and yet a critic. There is a sense in which he must be free, but another in which his thought must be very precisely regimented; there is poetry in science, but also a lot of bookkeeping. — Sir Peter B. Medawar FTB

11-19-2004, 05:27 PM	#3
RchW Hall Of Famer Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Toronto ON by way of Glasgow UK Posts: 15,629	Thanks, that is what I thought, but I saw Pudge Rodrigues with a PB of 8 and then I was not so sure.