|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| FHM 8 - General Discussion Talk about the latest & greatest FHM, officially licensed by the NHL! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 211
|
historical mode has no change
Hi
After testing the historical mode, I don't see any change, the errors that we found in the previous versions are still there. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 208
|
Quote:
It would probably be helpful for the team to know what issues you are referring to bring them back on the list. I'll share one. When playing historical during an era where there were ties, if you lose in overtime to a team, whenever you look at your record against that team, it will show as 0-0-1 instead of 0-1-0 as it should be. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 211
|
in historical mode, 1917 season series format I select 1 vs 2, in best 3 and the game remains in total goals format.
in historical mode, 1946 season series format I select 1 vs 4, 2 vs 3 the game remains 1 vs 3, 2 vs 4. the game doesn't seem to take into account the changes made |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 211
|
Tie game and overtime loss (T/OL) should be separated, an overtime loss that gives no points is a loss (L) not an overtime loss (OL), FHM makes no difference between the two.
This would make the statistics more consistent with reality in historical mode. it would avoid things like George Vezina with overtime losses when the statistic will appear 88 years later. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|