Home | Webstore
Latest News: OOTP 26 Available - FHM 11 Available - OOTP Go! Available

Out of the Park Baseball 26 Buy Now!

  

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Prior Versions of Our Games > Out of the Park Baseball 18 > OOTP 18 - General Discussions

OOTP 18 - General Discussions Everything about the 2017 version of Out of the Park Baseball - officially licensed by MLB.com and the MLBPA.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-29-2017, 03:45 PM   #1
PSUColonel
Hall Of Famer
 
PSUColonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,094
OOTP 18 mentioned on Two Year End Lists

OOTP 18 is listed by both Red Bull, PC Gamer.

https://www.redbull.com/gb-en/best-s...-the-year-2017



http://www.pcgamer.com/the-best-sports-games-on-pc/


Gamespot however didn’t even make mention:


https://www.gamespot.com/genre/sports/pc/
PSUColonel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 10:15 PM   #2
PSUColonel
Hall Of Famer
 
PSUColonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,094
Seems like Metacritic may have revamped their best of year criteria this year. Lossy year OPTP won with only seven critic reviews. This year, there are only five reviews, but the scores still garner a very respectable avg of 87/100. With a score like this, OOTP should still be receiving mention as one of the top games of the year. It seems metacritic is demanding more reviews now before allowing this. I can’t help but think this is likely due to OOTP 17 last year.
PSUColonel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2018, 01:49 AM   #3
bwburke94
Hall Of Famer
 
bwburke94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Belchertown, MA, USA
Posts: 4,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by PSUColonel View Post
Seems like Metacritic may have revamped their best of year criteria this year. Lossy year OPTP won with only seven critic reviews. This year, there are only five reviews, but the scores still garner a very respectable avg of 87/100. With a score like this, OOTP should still be receiving mention as one of the top games of the year. It seems metacritic is demanding more reviews now before allowing this. I can’t help but think this is likely due to OOTP 17 last year.
I've said before that OOTP and Metacritic don't mix. Seems that they keep moving the goalposts on this.
bwburke94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2018, 09:48 AM   #4
Cryomaniac
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hucknall, Notts, UK
Posts: 4,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwburke94 View Post
I've said before that OOTP and Metacritic don't mix. Seems that they keep moving the goalposts on this.
I doubt it's solely due to OOTP.

My guess is that they don't want things winning with a small number of reviews because it makes it easier for creators to "fake" reviews from their loyal subjects... er I mean forum members
__________________

Cryomaniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2018, 06:14 PM   #5
PSUColonel
Hall Of Famer
 
PSUColonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,094
So how do we get more established “professional” reviewers to rate OOTP?
PSUColonel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:06 AM.

 

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com.

Officially Licensed Product – MLB Players, Inc.

Out of the Park Baseball is a registered trademark of Out of the Park Developments GmbH & Co. KG

Google Play is a trademark of Google Inc.

Apple, iPhone, iPod touch and iPad are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.

COPYRIGHT © 2023 OUT OF THE PARK DEVELOPMENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2024 Out of the Park Developments