|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| OOTP 17 - General Discussions Everything about the latest Out of the Park Baseball - officially licensed by MLB.com and the MLBPA. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 588
|
Current Year Stats Meaning
Looking at the settings, I have wondered why about this. What do the current year stats mean? Isn't the ratings a "proper" reflection on how a player is? I can see where last year and 2 years ago, to dictate rise/fall.
But what is the purpose of looking at this current year's stats. Thank you in advance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Jose, CA USA
Posts: 3,494
|
Just to parallel real life, I think. We kind of have an idea of how good a player's skills are (ratings), but we always look at stats, too, to see how they're doing at the moment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 588
|
So lets say......
Ratings are set to 60, this year is 20, last is 15, 2 years is 5. What is it "measuring" when it looks at this years stats? What would the difference be if i set it to Ratings 70, this year 0, last 20, 2 years ago 10. Sorry if I am making this more difficult than it probably is |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Jose, CA USA
Posts: 3,494
|
Quote:
Ratings don't equate exactly to how a player does. A player with high ratings can have a bad year (or bad years). If the AI ignored stats completely, you could get offered in trade a guy hitting .210 for one hitting .300, for example, even if their ratings are comparable. Some people might not mind that, while others might. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 588
|
So the rating dont solely dictate how well a player is playing or will play this season?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Jose, CA USA
Posts: 3,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,118
|
Quote:
The player evaluation settings you are referring to in the game options are for determining how computer-controlled teams evaluate players in signings, trades, line-up construction, etc. Just like a human, you can expect computer-controlled teams to consider players' ratings and past performance (stats). This options screen lets you determine how much the AI weighs one or the other. If you don't have any particular reason to think the AI is making bad decisions, feel free to leave these settings at their defaults. These settings have no impact on how well players do or don't play.
__________________
"Sometimes, this is like going to a grocery store. You’ve got a list until you get to the check-out stand. And then you start reading People magazine, and all this other [stuff] ends up in the basket." -Sandy Alderson on the MLB offseason Last edited by Cinnamon J. Scudworth; 06-16-2016 at 08:06 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 588
|
Ohhhh.
SO. The current, last year, 2 years ago stats are used as weighted guides. They have 0 effect on the play on the field for this season. Just the current ratings. AND, A gm will look at the ratings, and the 3 seasons of stats to determine how valuable a player is in trades, signing, etc? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,291
|
Quote:
It doesn't have anything to do with how the players actually perform. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 588
|
Thank you all so very much for explaining this.
I really appreciate it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,140
|
I have decided last year's stats are just as important as the current year, and therefore have decided to go 30/30/30/10.
I was using 40/25/25/10...which is probably just as good |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SF Area, California Total Posts: 531,691
Posts: 2,370
|
I use this as well.
__________________
JML MILKSHAKES |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 588
|
Quote:
I am now, with again thanks to all that helped me, now doing 40,30,20,10. I would just like to know your logic. Last edited by KJDelaney; 06-17-2016 at 06:24 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,140
|
I used to do 40/30/20/10 also, but I feel the current and past year should be weighted equally. I feel the "last year" component is just as important as the current year. The current year is prorated, but I would argue the year two weight and current year combined equally give the AI a better gauge on a player's worth.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|