Caught stealing completely borked?

GrantDawg · 06-22-2011, 03:07 PM

Is the stat just completely screwed? Start a new historical league in 1901 (with the historical rosters, lineups, no scouting or coaches, recalc players/league totals every year) and by 1921 there are already 30 players that have been caught stealing 50+ times in a single season. That means that over 30 players are well over the actual major league record (42) in that stat. Someone point out to me that has been always a borked up stat in previous versions, so it just unfixable?

Carplos · 06-22-2011, 03:19 PM

There's a modifier for it in the league totals.

GrantDawg · 06-22-2011, 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carplos

There's a modifier for it in the league totals.

But I am using the historical totals (recalcing every year). So, is that what is broken?

Carplos · 06-22-2011, 03:30 PM

IIRC, CS totals aren't even available for the early 1900s, so I'm not sure what they based them on. I'm sure someone who developed the file can provide more info.

06-22-2011, 03:07 PM	#1
GrantDawg All Star Reserve Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Covington, Ga. Posts: 519	Caught stealing completely borked? Is the stat just completely screwed? Start a new historical league in 1901 (with the historical rosters, lineups, no scouting or coaches, recalc players/league totals every year) and by 1921 there are already 30 players that have been caught stealing 50+ times in a single season. That means that over 30 players are well over the actual major league record (42) in that stat. Someone point out to me that has been always a borked up stat in previous versions, so it just unfixable?

06-22-2011, 03:19 PM	#2
Carplos Hall Of Famer Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Idaho Posts: 2,855 Infractions: 1/0 (0)	There's a modifier for it in the league totals.

06-22-2011, 03:30 PM	#4
Carplos Hall Of Famer Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Idaho Posts: 2,855 Infractions: 1/0 (0)	IIRC, CS totals aren't even available for the early 1900s, so I'm not sure what they based them on. I'm sure someone who developed the file can provide more info.