|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| Earlier versions of OOTP: Logged Issues All issues that have been logged and given a TT # are stored here until fixed |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Grand Island, NE
Posts: 1,117
|
"Import Entire History"
My computer -- apparently -- either lacks the CPU or the RAM or whatever it takes, to easily use this exciting sounding feature. Before I devote hours-upon-hours and risk my computer locking up, I'd like to hear some impressions on how it works . . .
One thing that concerns me -- which I noticed in my 1910 import test -- was that there was a tab in the player profile for "real life stats" that showed the entire career, even beyond 1910. Did I miss the option to turn this off, or is it a hard-wired thing? Lastly, what (if anything) am I doing wrong to make the import take so long. I suppose it should take multiple hours since it imports so much, but how long is it taking everyone else, as a comparison? thanks in advance. EDIT: can't edit title, I guess. I'm referring to "Import Complete History" to be clear. Last edited by CHCfan; 03-23-2007 at 09:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Grand Island, NE
Posts: 1,117
|
Oh yeah, does anyone plan to release a template/quickstart of a 2006-with-history league? Perhaps this would be a more manageable way for some people to start these kind of leagues . . .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Greater Boston Area
Posts: 3,992
|
Quote:
As for the length of time, I can't help you. I've got a five year old computer, but it only took me somewhere between an hour or two to import up to 1962. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 822
|
Yeah, importing the entire history takes a long time. On my fairly recent computer w/ 1.5 gigs of ram, it took about 45 minutes or so to import the entire history up until 1995.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 599
|
Quote:
I guess I am using ATA hard drives -- could that be it? My processor is very fast and I have a gig of RAM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 124
|
I was able to import the entire history in 16.5 minutes, I guess im one of the lucky ones, my computer is about a year old, its a pentium 4 with 1gb of memory, I think the processor speed it 2.4 ghz maybe 3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 599
|
Quote:
And you have the box checked to import the entire history? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 266
|
Hmm...it definitely wasnt quick, but I want to say it was around 5-10 minutes to import to year 1988 for me. I guess it couldnt have been much longer as it didnt make me go watch a movie or anything.
My CPU is a little over a year old. Its a P4 3 GHz with 1GB of RAM. One thing you might want to try...get your system running as quick as possible first...defrag, & stop any unnecessary processes & make sure you arent multitasking with other apps when you run it. That might be a bit obvious, but it might help. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 599
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 599
|
There is no way there can be that much disparity between your importing and my importing. Are you sure you have clicked import entire history? Maybe it is because I'm using Gambo's DB? I'll try importing the other one and see if it is faster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 124
|
not sure the hard drive, I did check the box that said entire history and made the year 2006, im doing the same on my laptop and its not going quite as fast but thats ok...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 266
|
Quote:
I kinda jacked up what I wanted to do as choosing 1988 imported only to the 1987 stats instead of 1988's stats. I wanted to start in 1989 so I was missing a year in everybody's stats. Maybe I'll try it again tonight & time it...but I know it wasnt longer than 15 minutes as I would have given up & walked away if it did. But maybe it's quirky & variable, I dont know. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 599
|
Ok that does not make ANY sense -- Lahman's database takes 10 minutes to load 1985 and Gambo's DB takes 8 hours to load 1986.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 124
|
I guess I should have mentioned that I was using Lahman's database and it took me 16.5 mins on my desktop and 28 minutes on my laptop, I can't complain about that, this game is awesome...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 599
|
Yeah, I just can't figure out why my computer takes so long to load the Gambo DB. Is there something about it that makes it take longer?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 266
|
I just completed a new import using Lahman 54. 12 minutes exactly to import up to year 1989.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,506
|
I think some of the historical databases behave differently.
Not confirmed, but I've seen at least one person (Bobbuttons) have it basically never finish using Gambo's, and finish quickly with Lahman 54. If you're having this issue, I'd say try Lahman 54. If it's still not working, come look for the thread about this in Tech Support, and join the discussion. The expectation is that you should be able to import up to modern days within I'd say an hour or so, with the obvious caveat that everyone has different hardware. I mean, basically, if you leave it for six hours, and it's at 2% done, that's not right. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 599
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|