Quote:
Originally Posted by djday45
Erm excuse me, I wasant talking down to you in the slightest, you seem to be in quite an agressive mood so im going to choose my words carefully, If you dont like or have no use for the ratings thats fine but pls dont keep posting on this thread in an agressive manner, I havent got the time or the energy to reply and I wont in future. what i will say is that the vast majority of guys here appreciate each other, they might not always agree but they appreciate the effort people put in. You wont find me berating people on other threads about their lack of understanding just because they dont agree with me, as i said boxing is a game of opinions and so by extension is title bout.
As I said all im doing here is providing alternative ratings, Ive not only just started doing it ive been involved here for a long time as many others will attest to, im NOT trying to say my ratings are better than anyone elses just that they work for ME.
And lastly im trying to give my thinking behind such ratings category by category post by post, both because thats makes the thread a bit unique and also it increases knowledge or both the fighters and the game and encourages discussion and debate im not here to get involved in flames and i refuse to.
I will debate with you the attributes of any boxer from history in a relaxed and friendly manner and respect your opinion but as soon as you make it personal i will shut down and not reply.
anyway back to the boxing lol.
|
I will if you will. You addressed me first and giving advice and procedures the other party considers rudimentary can be considered aggressive.
:-) back to boxing
Edit: No, I guess my chart was first . . but it was a warm fuzzy chart :-)