Quote:
Originally Posted by OutS|der
Why 82? We got swept that year, 94 was better. It doesn't count unless we riot  |
I wanted a bit of a variety in the difficulty of the challenges, and 82's a good setup for a really tough one - finish below .500, then make the finals. 94 was actually pretty tough, too - people don't remember how poorly the team did in the regular season. But it stepped on what I had planned for the Rangers challenge (although I later modified the timeline for that one a little, so it wouldn't have mattered.)
But if the feature's popular, we'll be adding more challenges, it's not that time-consuming to do. Canucks will be due for an easier one, so it'll likely be 94 or 2011.