Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffR
No, definitely not. You need to find a balance between countering what the opponent is doing and what your players do well. If a player is only slightly worse at a role that happens to counter the opponent's tactics, it might be worth switching him. If he's much worse at it, probably not.
|
Thanks.
It seems there is an abundance of good fits (e.g. 5/5) even for players which ratings don't exactly fit the description very well, like a player with low shooting range is 5/5 for perimeter shooter and a player with below low average physical ratings gets a 5/5 for powerforward.
How should I handle it, does it make a difference if I select other 5/5 roles which rather suit their ratings for those players or is a 5/5 always the same?