|
I still haven't heard any pros or cons on using "double weight."
If checked, I guess a player has a better chance of matching the year's total that is doubled.
For example, on a three year recalc, his middle year's stats are more likely to be matched, and not the other two years:
1965 - 41 HR
1966 - 32 HR
1966 - 32 HR
1967 - 27 HR
He is more likely to hit around 32 HR, I would think?
|