Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeyman576
Let's see. Would I rather go to California where I can make $100,000 a year or Rhode Island where I can make $50 a year? The California's and Florida's and Texas' of the world already have enough of an advantage.
|
Because Rhode Island will no longer be able to steal recruits from UCLA, Texas & Miami like they are now? Like I said, things are already unbalanced. You think Oregon, Ok St & Maryland don't take advantage of the fact they have a billionaire backing up their athletic programs?
This isn't about competitive balance. That isn't what these bills are about. It is about correcting an unfair weight players have to endure. Why should players be restricted from earning a living? What other group is put under such a condition?
Like I said before, if certain schools get pushed aside because of this, IT IS THEIR OWN FAULT for not taking care of this themselves instead of giving the government time to get off their tookus.