OOTP Developments Forums - View Single Post

BaseballMan · 03-03-2019, 02:37 PM

Has the computer's hall of fame voting been improved.
Right now i'd have to say its worse than that that writer that didn't vote for Roberto Alomar.
I constantly see pitchers that have won over 3oo games and batters with 3,000 hits hardly getting any votes compared to players with much lower stats.
I see players with barely 200 wins getting a lot more votes. And the 300 winner is also ahead in WAR, HOF monitor as well. So i'm not sure what the ai is thinking. Ive tried changing every thing i can think of but the ai voting is still horrible.
I could just choose the hall of famers but that seems like a cheat.

I just finished the voting for 1937 and Honus Wagner did not get 1 single vote.
Not one.
Even though he had 3,577 hits and a .323 career avg.
George Gore had 1726 hits and .292 career avg. and got 0.4 % of the votes.
I have dropped players at 0% so Wagner should not have been dropped.

03-03-2019, 02:37 PM	#219
BaseballMan Hall Of Famer Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 6,272	Has the computer's hall of fame voting been improved. Right now i'd have to say its worse than that that writer that didn't vote for Roberto Alomar. I constantly see pitchers that have won over 3oo games and batters with 3,000 hits hardly getting any votes compared to players with much lower stats. I see players with barely 200 wins getting a lot more votes. And the 300 winner is also ahead in WAR, HOF monitor as well. So i'm not sure what the ai is thinking. Ive tried changing every thing i can think of but the ai voting is still horrible. I could just choose the hall of famers but that seems like a cheat. I just finished the voting for 1937 and Honus Wagner did not get 1 single vote. Not one. Even though he had 3,577 hits and a .323 career avg. George Gore had 1726 hits and .292 career avg. and got 0.4 % of the votes. I have dropped players at 0% so Wagner should not have been dropped. Last edited by BaseballMan; 03-03-2019 at 03:04 PM.