OOTP Developments Forums - View Single Post

exitonly · 08-23-2009, 03:57 AM

Re: Parks Import for OOTP10

I think that almost every stadium has flawed ballpark factors, though some are better than others.

A 6 year avg of espn's park factors =

i don't think just averaging each years BPF is the best method to show my point, but it was easiest. Still I'm almost positive that by just copying these numbers that it would be better (more realistic) than the ones that came with whats imported. That said i have run 0 simulations to back that up.

besides that the import is great just for the field pictures. the dimenensions are cool too although dimensions are just cosmetic says manual and the ballpark factors are everything... so thats why i'm posting, having perfect field dimensions and using incredibly short sample sized park factors (if that's even how you guys got the numbers) doesn't make sense.

08-23-2009, 03:57 AM	#64
exitonly Bat Boy Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 12	Re: Parks Import for OOTP10 I think that almost every stadium has flawed ballpark factors, though some are better than others. A 6 year avg of espn's park factors = i don't think just averaging each years BPF is the best method to show my point, but it was easiest. Still I'm almost positive that by just copying these numbers that it would be better (more realistic) than the ones that came with whats imported. That said i have run 0 simulations to back that up. besides that the import is great just for the field pictures. the dimenensions are cool too although dimensions are just cosmetic says manual and the ballpark factors are everything... so thats why i'm posting, having perfect field dimensions and using incredibly short sample sized park factors (if that's even how you guys got the numbers) doesn't make sense. Last edited by exitonly; 08-23-2009 at 03:58 AM.