OOTP Developments Forums - View Single Post

Spartacus70 · 03-31-2019, 09:11 AM

Any chances this year to have a hotfix about this?

Excellent update. In historical The PIMs are more balanced now.
My only concern is the tactical roles Goon and Enforcer. This 2 roles are identicals : screening (?!) and strengh in red, and fighting in green.
For exemple Dave schultz is always suitable as agitator (19) or grinder (14) and only at (12) as goon or enforcer.

Why I consider it important?
From the manual :
Goons and Enforcers will reduce opponent's bravery, unless countered by presence of the opponent's goons and/or enforcers.
Agitators will lower the Temperament attribute of opponents, leading them to take more penalties.
So only Goons and Enforcers ad an intimidating factor by lowering the opponent bravery.
But since the historical good fighters normally have high aggression, (and low temperament) and its take in calculation only in the agitator tac. role, who will be goons and enforcers.

In this situation, the «Broad Street Bullies» are denatured : 29 fights (IRL 77) and with no important intimidating factor...

Some suggestions :

Why aggression is more relevant for agitator than for a goon?
Why low temperament is not relevant for goon or bravery/leadership for enforcer?

03-31-2019, 09:11 AM	#1
Spartacus70 Minors (Double A) Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Sao Paulo, Brasil Posts: 198	Enforcers tacticals roles Any chances this year to have a hotfix about this? Excellent update. In historical The PIMs are more balanced now. My only concern is the tactical roles Goon and Enforcer. This 2 roles are identicals : screening (?!) and strengh in red, and fighting in green. For exemple Dave schultz is always suitable as agitator (19) or grinder (14) and only at (12) as goon or enforcer. Why I consider it important? From the manual : *Goons* and Enforcers will reduce opponent's bravery, unless countered by presence of the opponent's goons and/or enforcers. Agitators will lower the Temperament attribute of opponents, leading them to take more penalties. So only Goons and Enforcers ad an intimidating factor by lowering the opponent bravery. But since the historical good fighters normally have high aggression, (and low temperament) and its take in calculation only in the agitator tac. role, who will be goons and enforcers. In this situation, the «Broad Street Bullies» are denatured : 29 fights (IRL 77) and with no important intimidating factor... Some suggestions : Why aggression is more relevant for agitator than for a goon? Why low temperament is not relevant for goon or bravery/leadership for enforcer? Last edited by Spartacus70; 06-22-2019 at 10:11 AM.